Who serves whom? Immigration control, social welfare, and the public interest in a federalist system

Titolo Rivista MONDI MIGRANTI
Autori/Curatori Eva A. Millona
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 13 P. 221-233 Dimensione file 50 KB
DOI 10.3280/MM2015-002009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Aclu Files (2014). First Lawsuit Challenging Officers' Use of SB 1070. Show Me Your Papers. Law, American Civil Liberties Union, Sept. 25.
  2. Arizona v. U.S., 132 U.S. 2492, 2498 (2012).
  3. Board of Higher Education Residency Status For Tuition Classification Purposes, ResidencyStatusfor Tuition Classification PurposeswithForm .pdf.
  4. Cambridge Municipal Code, Ch. 2.123, Cambridge Commission on Immigrant Rights and Citizenship.
  5. Gaouette N. (2007). In: Gop Race, ‘Sanctuary City’ is a Dangerous Place, Nov. 30. Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971) .
  6. Gzesh S. (2006). Central Americans and Asylum Policy in the Reagan Era. Migration Information Source, April.
  7. Lucas Guttentag (2012). Discrimination, Preemption, and Arizona’s Immigration Law, 65 Stan. L. Rev. Online 1, June 18.
  8. Luo M. (2007). A Closer Look at the “Sanctuary City” Argument. New York Times, Nov. 29.
  9. National Immigrant Law Center, Table (2014). Medical Assistance Programs for Immigrants in Various States, February.
  10. National Immigration Law Center, Maps (2014). State Laws & Policies on Access to Higher Education for Immigrants, July.
  11. Policy Order Resolution (2006). 0-16m, May 8.
  12. Ramakrishnan K., Gulasekaram P. (2014). Understanding Immigration Federalism in the United States. Center for American Progress, 23, March.
  13. Real ID Enforcement in Brief, Department of Homeland Security
  14. Rodriguez C. (2013). Law and Borders. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 33.
  15. Tramonte L. (2011). Debunking the Myth of “Sanctuary Cities”. Immigration Policy Center, American Immigration Law Foundation, April.
  16. U.S. Census, City of Chelsea, 2008-2012
  17. U.S. Constitution . amend. X. Wong Wing v. U.S., 163 U.S. 228 (1896) (internal citations removed), citing Yick
  18. Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).

Eva A. Millona, Who serves whom? Immigration control, social welfare, and the public interest in a federalist system in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 2/2015, pp 221-233, DOI: 10.3280/MM2015-002009