Exploring the causal relationships between health, pollution, and growth: Evidence from OECD countries

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Carla Massidda
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 13-28 Dimensione file 140 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2023-001002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study examines the impact of particulate matter and income levels on three mortality indicators in a sample of OECD countries from 1990 to 2017. The em-pirical analysis is performed within a panel cointegration framework to test for cointegration and causal relationships. The findings support an equilibrium rela-tionship holding mortality rates with pollution and income in the long-run. Esti-mated coefficients and causality tests show that increasing pollution rises mortali-ty rates while increasing GDP per capita has the opposite effect. The main contri-bution of this study is to bring attention to the relationship between mortality rates, fine particulate matter and income for a panel of OECD countries combining coin-tegration analysis and causality tests.

Keywords:health, pollution, sustainable growth, causality, Agenda 2030

  1. Grossman M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2): 223-255.
  2. Arceo E., Hanna R. and Oliva P. (2016). Does the effect of pollution on infant mortality differ between developing and developed countries? Evidence from Mexico City?, Econ. J., 126(591): 257-280.
  3. Beatty T.K.M. and Shimshack J.P. (2014). Air pollution and children’s respiratory health: a cohort analysis. J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 67(1): 39-57.
  4. Chaabouni S. and Saidi K. (2017). The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: a case study for 51 countries. Environ. Resources, 158: 137-144.
  5. Chen Y.L., Shih Y.H., Tseng C.H., Kang S.Y. and Wang H.C. (2013). Economic and health benefits of the co-reduction of air pollutants and greenhouse gases. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, 18(8): 1125-1139.
  6. Chen X., Shao S., Tian Z., Xie Z. and Yin P. (2017). Impacts of air pollution and its spatial spillover effect on public health based on China’s big data sample. J. Clean. Prod., 142: 915-925.
  7. Dockery D.W., Pope C.A., Xu X., Spengler J.D., Ware J.H., Fay M.E. and Speizer F.E. (1993). An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N. Engl. J. Medicine, 329(24): 1753-1759.
  8. Erçelik G. (2018). The relationship between health expenditure and economic growth in Turkey from 1980 to 2015. Journal of Politics, Economy and Management, 1(1).
  9. Erdoğan E., Ener M. and Arıca F. (2013). The strategic role of infant mortality in the process of economic growth: an application for high income OECD countries. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci, 99: 19-25.
  10. Fogel R.W. (1997). Economic and social structure for an ageing population. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society London B, 352: 1905-1917.
  11. Im K. S., Pesaran M. and Shin Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  12. Johansen S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3): 231-254. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
  13. Katrakilidis C., Kyritsis I. and Patsika V. (2016). The dynamic linkages between economic growth, environmental quality and health in Greece. Applied Economics Letters, 23(3): 217-221. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1066482.
  14. Li X. and Hu Z. (2020). Interaction between economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 68(3/4): 162-177. DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2020.10043889
  15. Lu Z. N., Chen H., Hao Y., Wang J., Song X. and Mok T. M. (2017). The dynamic relationship between environmental pollution, economic development and public health: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166: 134-147.
  16. Mardani A., Streimikiene D., Cavallaro F., Loganathan N. and Khoshnoudi M. (2018). Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: a systematic review of two decades of research from1995 to 2017. Sci. Total. Environ., 649: 31-49.
  17. Massidda C. (2021). The Role of Air Pollution and Income in Public Health in OECD Countries. Applied Economics Quarterly, 27(3): 225-254.
  18. Mayer D. (2001). The long-term impact of health on economic growth in Latin America. World Development, 29(6): 1025-1033. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00026-2
  19. Mikucka M., Sarracino F. and Dubrow J.K. (2017). When does economic growth improve life Satisfaction? Multilevel analysis of the roles of social trust and income inequality in 46 countries, 1981e2012. World. Dev., 93: 447-459.
  20. Morand O.F. (2005). Economic growth, health, and longevity in the very long term: facts and mechanisms. In: Lopez-Casasnovas G., Rivera B., Currais L., editors, Health and Economic Growth: Findings and Policy Implications, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 239-254.
  21. Narayan P.K. and Narayan S. (2008). Does environmental quality influence health expenditures? Empirical evidence from a panel of selected OECD countries. Ecol. Econ., 65: 367-374.
  22. Pedroni P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653-670.
  23. Picatoste J., Ruesga-Benito S.M. and González-Laxe F. (2018). Economic environment and health care coverage: analysis of social acceptance of access restrictive policies applied in Spain in the context of economic crisis. J. Clean. Prod., 172: 3600-3608.
  24. Ritchie H. and M. Rose. (2018). Causes of Death. Our World in data.
  25. Schwartz J., Bind P. and Koutrakis M.A. (2017). Estimating causal effects of local air pollution on daily deaths: effect of low levels. Environ Health Perspective, 125: 23-29. DOI: 10.1289/EHP232
  26. Stenberg K., Axelson H., Sheehan P., Anderson I., Gülmezoglu A.M., Temmerman M., Mason E. and Friedman H. (2014). Advancing social and economic development by investing in women’s and children’s health: a new global investment framework. Lancet, 383: 1333-1354. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62231-X
  27. Stern D.I. (2017). The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1): 7-28.
  28. Wang Z., Asghar M.M., Zaidi S. and Wang B. (2019). Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, health expenditures, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26: 15285-15299.
  29. Weil D.N. (2014). Health and economic growth. Handb. Econ. Growth, 2: 623-682.
  30. Yazdi K.S. and Khanalizadeh B. (2017). Air pollution, economic growth and health care expenditure. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1): 1181-1190. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314823
  31. Zaidi S. and Saidi K. (2018). Environmental pollution, health expenditure and economic growth in the Sub-Saharan Africa countries: Panel ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Societies, 41: 833-840.

Carla Massidda, Exploring the causal relationships between health, pollution, and growth: Evidence from OECD countries in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2023, pp 13-28, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2023-001002