When public space is private. POPS and the case of Granary Square in London

Journal title ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Author/s Antonella Bruzzese
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2023/138 Language Italian
Pages 24 P. 5-28 File size 164 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2023-138001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Frequent in cities of Anglo-Saxon culture, POPS, privately owned public spaces, are based on maintaining private ownership of land and public-private agreements regulating uses, accessibility, and management. The paper analyses the case of Granary Square, London and the main elements at the base of its functioning (contractual nature, management as curatorship, forms of control of uses) to reflect on how to manage public spaces, particularly those privately managed.

Keywords: POPS privately owned public; public space; management; public-private partnership; King’s Cross.

  1. Bishop P. and Williams L. (2016). Planning, politics and city making. A case study of King’s Cross. London: RIBA Publishing London.
  2. Brighenti A.M. (2010). The publicness of public space. On the public domain. Quaderno 49, Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale – Università degli Studi di Trento.
  3. Bruzzese A. and Tamini L. (2014). Servizi commerciali e produzioni creative. Sei itinerari nella Milano che cambia. Milano: Bruno Mondadori. Bruzzese A., Gerosa G. e Tamini L. (2016). Spazio pubblico e attrattività urbana. L’isola e le sue piazze. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  4. Bruzzese A. (2022). Lo spazio pubblico nei progetti di Reinventing Cities a Milano: il ruolo del bando nelle scelte progettuali. Atti XIII Giornata di Studio INU, Urbanistica Informazioni, 306 s.i. Nov Dic 2022, pp. 804-806.
  5. Carmona M. (2004). 5. Kings Cross Central, the flexible plan, 14.08.2004 pubblicato su: https://matthew-carmona.com (ultima consultazione settembre 2023). Carmona M., De Magalhaes C. and Hammond L. (2008). Public Space: The Management Dimension. New York: Routledge Press. Carmona M. and Wunderlich F. (2013). Capital Spaces, the Multiple Complex Spaces of a Global City. London: Routledge.
  6. Carmona M. (2015). Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(4): 373-405. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2014.909518
  7. Carmona M. (2022). The “public-isation” of private space – towards a charter of public space rights and responsibilities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 15(2): 133-164. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2021.1887324
  8. Cho I.S., Heng C.K. and Trivic Z. (2016). Re-framing Urban Space: Urban Design for Emerging Hybrid and High-density Conditions. New York: Routledge.
  9. de Magalhães C. and Freire Trigo S. (2017). ‘Clubification’ of urban public spaces? The withdrawal or the re-definition of the role of local government in the management of public spaces. Journal of Urban Design, 22(6): 738-756. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2017.1336059
  10. Edwards M. (2009). King’s Cross: Renaissance for whom? In: Punter J., a cura di, Urban Design and the British Urban Renaissance. London: Routledge. Fainstein S.S. (2010). The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Fainstein S.S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1): 1-18.
  12. Koch, Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York. Gehl J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington: Island Press. Habermas J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. UK:
  13. Polity Press. Hajer M. and Reijndorp A. (2001). In Search of New Public Domain. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers. Harvey D. (1973). Social Justice and the City. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  14. Holgersen S. and Haarstad H. (2009). Class, Community and Communicative Planning: Urban Redevelopment at King’s Cross, London. Antipode, 41(2): 348-370.
  15. Jóźwik R. (2018). The problem of urban redevelopment of post-industrial King’s Cross central area in London. Budownictwo i Architektura, 17(1): 063-069. Kayden J. (2000). Privately Owned Public Space: The New York Experience.
  16. London: Wiley & Sons. Leclercq E. and Pojani D. (2023). Public space privatisation: are users concerned?. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2021.1933572
  17. Lefebvre H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos. London Assembly (2011). Public Life in Private Hands, Managing London’s Public Space. London: Great London Authority.
  18. Low S. and Smith N. (2006). Introduction: The imperative of Public Space. In: Low S. and Smith N., eds., The Politics of Public Space. New York-London: Routledge, 1-6.
  19. Marcuse P. (2003). The Threats to Publicly Usable Space in a Time of Contraction. Wolkenkuckucksheim. Internationale Zeitschrift für Theorie und Wissenschaft der Architektur, 8(1).
  20. Marcuse P. (2014). The paradoxes of public space. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 38(1): 102-106. DOI: 10.3846/20297955.2014.891559.
  21. Mumford L. (1961). Le città nella storia, vol. 3. Milano: Bompiani.
  22. Németh J. and Schmidt S. (2007). Toward a Methodology for Measuring the Security of Publicly Accessible Spaces. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3): 283-297. DOI: 10.1080/01944360708977978
  23. Németh J. and Schmidt S. (2011). The Privatization of Public Space: Modeling and Measuring Publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1): 5-23.
  24. Nissen S. (2008). Urban Transformation from Public and Private Space to Spaces of Hybrid Character. Sociologický Casopis. Czech Sociological Review, 44(6): 1129-1149.
  25. Ostrom E. (2003). How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3): 239-270. DOI: 10.1177/0951692803015003002
  26. Sorkin M. (1992). Variations on a Theme Park. The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill & Wang. Tonkiss F. (2005). Space, City and Social Theory: Social Relations and Urban Forms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  27. Zukin S. (1998). Urban Lifestyles: Diversity and Standardisation in Spaces of Consumption. Urban Studies, 35(5-6): 825-839. DOI: 10.1080/0042098984574
  28. Zukin S. (2009). Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places, Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

Antonella Bruzzese, Quando lo spazio pubblico è privato. I "POPS" e il caso di Granary Square a Londra in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 138/2023, pp 5-28, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2023-138001