A Critical Note on Ricardo’s views on Absolute and Relative Value in terms of Labor Values

Journal title HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY
Author/s Miguel D. Ramirez
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2023/2
Language English Pages 14 P. 53-66 File size 62 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2023-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This note examines Ricardo’s views on absolute and relative value in terms of the labor theory of value. It discusses why Ricardo viewed the construction of a standard of value capable of measuring changes in the absolute value of commodities as critical to understanding the division of the national product among the main contending classes in a competitive capitalist economy. The paper also highlights the shortcomings of Ricardo’s proposed standard measure of value – one that would challenge and confound him all his life.

Keywords: absolute value; competitive capitalist economy; invariable measure of value; labor theory of value; national product; natural prices; relative value.

Jel codes: B10, B12, B24

  1. Blaug M. (1998). Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed., New York, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Ekelund Jr. R.B., Hebert R.F. (2004). A History of Economic Theory and Method, 4th ed. Long Grove, Illinois, Waveland Press, Inc.
  3. Howard M.C., King J.E. (1985). The Political Economy of Marx, New York, Longman.
  4. Howard M.C., King J.E. (1992). A History of Marxian Economics: Volume II, 19291990, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
  5. Hunt E.K., Lautzenheiser M. (2011). History of Economic Thought: A Critical Perspective, 3rd ed., New York, M.E. Sharpe Kurz H.D., Salvadori N. (1993). The ‘Standard Commodity’ and Ricardo’s Search for an ‘Invariable Measure of Value’. In M. Baranzini and G.C. Harcourt (edited by), The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, New York, St. Martin’s Press, Inc. Meek R.L. (1975). Studies in the Labor Theory of Value, 2nd ed., New York, Monthly Review Press.
  6. Ricardo D. (1817). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, New York, E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc. [1977].
  7. Should B. (1967). Karl Marx’s Solutions to Some Theoretical Problems of Classical Economics. In M.C. Howard and J. E. King (edited by), The Economics of Marx, New York, Penguin Books [1976].
  8. Smith A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Book II, Edwin Cannan, Ed., Chicago, The University of Chicago Press [1976]. Sraffa P. (2004 [orig., 1951-73]). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo: Letters, Vol. I. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Indianapo-lis, Liberty Fund.
  9. Sraffa P. (2004 [orig., 1951-73]). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo: Letters, Vol. II. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
  10. Sraffa P. (2004 [orig., 1951-73]). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo: Letters, Vol. VIII, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
  11. Sraffa P. (2004 [orig., 1951-73]). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo: Letters, Vol. IX, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
  12. Sraffa P. (2004 [orig., 1951-73]). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo: Pamphlets and Papers, 1815-1823, Vol. IV, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
  13. Sraffa P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
  14. Wolff R.P. (1984). Understanding Marx: A Reconstruction and Critique of Capital, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

Miguel D. Ramirez, A Critical Note on Ricardo’s views on Absolute and Relative Value in terms of Labor Values in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 2/2023, pp 53-66, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2023-002003