The “Snail Model”: Mapping the patient journey through an experiential standpoint

Titolo Rivista MECOSAN
Autori/Curatori Agnese Palvarini
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2024/129
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 15 P. 93-107 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/mesa2024-129oa18725
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

BackgroundPatient journey mapping is widely considered a helpful tool to enhance the patient experience by supporting practitioners in the provision of patient-centered care. PurposeThe ultimate goal of this paper is to introduce an all-encompassing framework that integrates the experientialdimension of care into the major phases of the patient journey, as well as identify how different patterns of behavior may influence the therapeutic path. MethodologyThe analysis is divided into two parts. The first involves the theory adaptation of a marketing framework to healthcare in the context of the Experience Economy.The second consists of the theoretical conceptualization of a patient journey map called the “Snail Model”. FindingsThe results show how the interaction between health literacy and involvement may unearth four typologies of patients: resigned, informed, expert, and responsible. Furthermore, the following stages of the patient journey are identified: i) health communication policies and prevention programs; ii) health service access and diagnostic process; iii) patient involvement and therapeutic adherence; iv) doctor-patient communication failure and therapeutic non-adherence. Practice implicationsIt is crucial for practitioners to adopt an experiential standpoint when providing care. The theories presented in this study should assist them in clustering patients according to their behaviors, as well as monitoring the effectiveness of the patient journey. ConclusionThe NHS should ensure effective prevention programs, equal access to healthcare, and adherence to treatments.Overall, patient involvement is essential to improving the quality of care and the whole patient experience.

BackgroundPatient journey mapping is widely considered a helpful tool to enhance the patient experience by supporting practitioners in the provision of patient-centered care. PurposeThe ultimate goal of this paper is to introduce an all-encompassing framework that integrates the experientialdimension of care into the major phases of the patient journey, as well as identify how different patterns of behavior may influence the therapeutic path. MethodologyThe analysis is divided into two parts. The first involves the theory adaptation of a marketing framework to healthcare in the context of the Experience Economy.The second consists of the theoretical conceptualization of a patient journey map called the “Snail Model”. FindingsThe results show how the interaction between health literacy and involvement may unearth four typologies of patients: resigned, informed, expert, and responsible. Furthermore, the following stages of the patient journey are identified: i) health communication policies and prevention programs; ii) health service access and diagnostic process; iii) patient involvement and therapeutic adherence; iv) doctor-patient communication failure and therapeutic non-adherence. Practice implicationsIt is crucial for practitioners to adopt an experiential standpoint when providing care. The theories presented in this study should assist them in clustering patients according to their behaviors, as well as monitoring the effectiveness of the patient journey. ConclusionThe NHS should ensure effective prevention programs, equal access to healthcare, and adherence to treatments.Overall, patient involvement is essential to improving the quality of care and the whole patient experience.

Parole chiave:; Patient experience; Patient journey mapping; Prevention and control; Early diagnosis; Patient participation; Treatment adherence and compliance

  1. Anderson R.T., Camacho F.T. & Balkrishnan R. (2007). Willing to wait? The influence of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care. BMC Health Services Research, 5: 1-5. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-31
  2. Barlow J. et al. (2002). Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Education and Counseling, 48(2): 177-187. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00032-0
  3. Baumann L.C. & Karel A. (2013). Prevention: Primary, Secondary, Tertiary. In: M.D. Gellman & J.R. Turner (edited by). Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York: Springer, pp. 1532-1534.
  4. Beleffi E., Mosconi P. & Sheridan S. (2021). The Patient Journey. In L. Donaldson et al. (edited by). Textbook of Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management. Cham: Springer, pp. 117-127.
  5. Bravo P. et al. (2015). Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1): 252. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z
  6. Chakrabarti S. (2014). What’s in a name? Compliance, adherence, and concordance in chronic psychiatric disorders. World Journal of Psychiatry, 4(2): 30-36. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v4.i2.30
  7. Coulter A. (2011). Engaging patients in healthcare. London: Open University Press.
  8. Davies E.L. et al. (2023). Reporting and conducting patient journey mapping research in healthcare: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79: 83-100. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15479 [last access: 15/03/2024]
  9. Domenighetti, G. et al. (2010). Ability to pay and equity in access to Italian and British National Health Services. European Journal of Public Health, 20(5): 500-503. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq001
  10. Gupta D. & Denton B. (2008). Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities. IIE transactions, 40(9): 800-819. DOI: 10.1080/07408170802165880
  11. Hanna T.P. et al. (2020). Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 371, m4087. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4087
  12. Hickmann E., Richter P. & Schlieter H. (2022). All together now – patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1): 1116. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5 [last access: 10/11/2023]
  13. Hovstadius B. & Petersson G. (2011). Non-adherence to drug therapy and drug acquisition costs in a national population – a patient-based register study. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1): 326. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-326
  14. Julius R.J., Novitsky M.A. & Dubin W.R. (2009). Medication adherence: a review of the literature and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 15(1): 34-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.pra.0000344917.43780.77
  15. Kardas P., Lewek P. & Matyjaszczyk M. (2013). Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 4(91): 91. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00091
  16. Keshavarzi M.H. et al. (2022). Barriers of Physician-Patient Relationships in Professionalism: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 10(3): 199-206. DOI: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.94010.1563
  17. Leavell H.R. & Clark E.G. (1965). Preventive medicine for the doctor in his community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Lee S. et al. (2020). Waiting time, communication quality, and patient satisfaction: An analysis of moderating influences on the relationship between perceived waiting time and the satisfaction of breast cancer patients during their inpatient stay. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(4): 819-825. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.018
  19. Levesque J., Harris M.F. & Russell G. (2013). Patient-centred access to healthcare: conceptualizing access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12(1): 18. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18
  20. Lian J. et al. (2019). Long-term cost-effectiveness of a Patient Empowerment Programme for type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 21(1): 73-83. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13485
  21. Liu C. et al. (2020). What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8, e000351. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000351
  22. Mahajan A., Tirakotai W. & Masayaanon P. (2023). The hidden costs of universal health coverage: solutions from the fight against catastrophic healthcare expenditure in Thailand. BMJ Global Health, 8, e011932. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011932
  23. Major I. (2019). Two-Sided Information Asymmetry in the Healthcare Industry. International Advances in Economic Research, 25: 177-193. DOI: 10.1007/s11294-019-09732-9
  24. McCarthy S. et al. (2016). An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(sup1): 354-368. DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2016.1187394
  25. Naghavi S. et al. (2019). Effective factors in non-compliance with therapeutic orders of specialists in outpatient clinics in Iran: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1): 413. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4229-4
  26. Oben P. (2020). Understanding the Patient Experience: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Patient Experience, 7(6): 906-910. DOI: 10.1177/2374373520951672
  27. Pera M.C. et al. (2020). Diagnostic journey in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Is it still an odyssey?. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0230677. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230677
  28. Philpot L.M. et al. (2019). Creation of a Patient-Centered Journey Map to Improve the Patient Experience: A Mixed Methods Approach.
  29. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 3(4): 466-475. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.07.004
  30. Pine J.B. & Gilmore J.H. (1998). Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4): 97-105.
  31. Pine J.B. & Gilmore J.H. (2001). Welcome to the experience economy. It’s no longer just about healing: patients want a personal transformation. Health Forum Journal, 44(5): 10-16.
  32. Rawson A., Duncan E. & Jones C. (2013). The Truth about Customer Experience. Harvard Business Review, 91: 1-10.
  33. Santini A., Man A. & Voidăzan S. (2021). Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 7(3): 241-248. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2021-0022
  34. Schouten B. et al. (2022). Experiences and perspectives of older patients with a return visit to the emergency department within 30 days: patient journey mapping. European Geriatric Medicine, 13: 339-350. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00581-6
  35. Simonse L., Albayrak A. & Starre S. (2019). Patient journey method for integrated service design. Design for Health, 3(1): 82-97. DOI: 10.1080/24735132.2019.1582741
  36. Small N. et al. (2013). Patient empowerment in longterm conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1): 263. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-263
  37. The Beryl Institute. <https://www.theberylinstitute.org> [last access: 07/03/2024].
  38. Trebble T.M. et al. (2010). Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction. BMJ, 341. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c4078
  39. WHO (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. Working paper. Geneva.
  40. WHO (2013). Health Literacy: The solid facts. Working Paper. Copenhagen.
  41. Müskens J.L.J.M. et al. (2022). Overuse of diagnostic testing in healthcare: a systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 31: 54-63. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012576

Agnese Palvarini, The “Snail Model”: Mapping the patient journey through an experiential standpoint in "MECOSAN" 129/2024, pp 93-107, DOI: 10.3280/mesa2024-129oa18725