Ownership structure and governance issues in small family wine business. The Case study "di marzo"

Journal title ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA
Author/s Antonio D'Amato, Giuseppe Festa
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1 Language Italian
Pages 23 P. 5-27 File size 144 KB
DOI 10.3280/EI2014-001001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In 2008, the "Cantine di Marzo" wine farm concluded a long process of proprietary concentration, which led to a drastic reduction of the number of shareholders, concentrating in the hands of the present owners about 86% of the shares. This process of revision of the ownership was considered a priority for the survival of the enterprise, in consideration of the immobility in which the company had fallen as a result of the increase of the shareholders, registered as a result of repeated inheritances. From the analysis of this situation two crucial questions emerge: is it possible that the ownership concentration constitutes a useful strategy to revive the action of the governance? If so, what are the reasons that contribute to the improvement of the complementary action of the management? The experience of the Cantine di Marzo wine farm suggests that the concentration may be a viable strategy of governance, since it enabled, in this case, to achieve a more strategic dynamics and a better operational flexibility. This study, therefore, starting with an analysis of the literature on the effects of the ownership structure on corporate governance of businesses in general and family businesses in particular, analyzes the benefits of ownership concentration. Furthermore, it presents the case study Cantine di Marzo, illustrates the results of the analysis and discusses the scientific and managerial implications.

Keywords: Corporate governance, wine farm, family business, stewardship theory, management performance.

  1. Corbetta G., Minichilli A., Quarato F. (2012). Osservatorio AUB su tutte le aziende familiari italiane di medie e grandi dimensioni – IV Rapporto, disponibile su: www.aidafey.unibocconi.it.
  2. Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D., Donaldson L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 1: 20-47, DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180258
  3. Davis P.S., Harveston P.D. (2001). The phenomenon of substantive conflict in the family firm: A cross generational study. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 1: 14-30, DOI: 10.1111/0447-2778.00003
  4. Denzin N. (1970). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago (IL, USA): Aldine Pub. Co.
  5. Dufour Y., Steane P. (2010). Building a good solid family wine business: Casella Wines. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 22, 2: 122-132, DOI: 10.1108/17511061011061694
  6. Donna G. (2007). La creazione di valore nella gestione dell’impresa. Roma: Carocci.
  7. Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 4: 545-565, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004
  8. Fayol H. (1962). Direzione industriale e generale: programmazione, organizzazione, comando, coordinamento e controllo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Galgano F. (2007). Le società in genere. Le società di persone. Milano: Giuffrè.
  10. Gallucci C., D’Amato A. (2013). Exploring nonlinear effects of family power on the performance of Italian wine businesses. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 25, 3: 185-202, DOI: 10.1108/IJWBR-2012-0017
  11. Gersick K.E., Davis J.A., Hampton M.M., Lansberg I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  12. Gill J., Johnson P. (2002). Research Methods for Managers. London: Sage Publications.
  13. Hansmann H. (2000). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge (MA, USA): Harvard University Press.
  14. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 4: 305-360, DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  15. Kellermanns F.W., Eddleston K.A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 3: 209-229, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.x
  16. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 6: 1113-1155, DOI: 10.1086/250042.LiuW.,YangH.,ZhangG.(2012).Doesfamilybusinessexcelinfirmperformance?Aninstitution-basedview.AsiaPacificJournalofManagement,29,4:965-987,doi:10.1007/s10490-010-9216-6
  17. Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Scholnick B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of management Studies, 45, 1: 51-78.
  18. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. e Alexander L. (1995). In Depth Interviewing. Melbourne: Longman Australia Pty Ltd.
  19. Ruekert R.W., Walker O.C. (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51, 1: 1-19, DOI: 10.2307/1251140
  20. Salvato C. (2004). Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. Journal of Private Equity, 7, 3: 68-76, DOI: 10.3905/jpe.2004.412339
  21. Schulze W., Lubatkin M., Dino R. (2003). Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 2: 179-194, DOI: 10.2307/30040613
  22. Sciarelli S. (2011). La gestione dell’impresa. Padova: Cedam.
  23. Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 461-488, DOI: 10.1086/261385
  24. Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52, 2: 737-783, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  25. Yin R. (2003). Case Study Research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
  26. Zampi V. (2013). Modelli proprietari, passaggio generazionale ed evoluzione dei modelli imprenditoriali nelle aziende familiari del settore vitivinicolo in Toscana, in Torcivia S. (a cura di). Modelli di family business del settore vitivinicolo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  27. Schwarz B. (1990). The creation and destruction of value. American Psychologist, 45, 7: 7-15, DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.1.7
  28. Anderson R., Reeb D. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 3: 1301-1328, DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
  29. Berle A., Means G. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
  30. Bono P., La filiera agroalimentare italiana: inefficienze sì, speculazioni no, disponibile su: www.nomisma.it.
  31. Carney M., Gedajlovic E. (2002). The coupling of ownership and control and the allocation of financial resources: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Management
  32. Studies, 39: 123-146, DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00285.ChellE.,Karatas¸-ÖzkanM.(2014),Handbookofresearchonsmallbusinessandentrepreneurship,ElgarPublishing,Cheltenham,UK,doi:10.4337/9781849809245
  33. Claessens S., Djankov S., Fan P.H., Lang H.P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 62, 6: 2741-2771, DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00511
  34. Coda V. (1984), La valutazione della formula imprenditoriale. Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 82.
  35. Corbetta G., Salvato C. (2004). Self-Serving or Self-Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non-Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 4: 355-362, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00050.x

  • The effect of ownership concentration on non-financial information mandatory disclosure: Evidence from Italy Simona Fiandrino, Fabio Rizzato, Donatella Busso, Alain Devalle, in Corporate Ownership and Control /2019 pp.79
    DOI: 10.22495/cocv17i1art8

Antonio D'Amato, Giuseppe Festa, Assetti proprietari e problematiche di governance nelle piccole imprese familiari del comparto vitivinicolo. Il case study dell’azienda agricola "di marzo" in "ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA" 1/2014, pp 5-27, DOI: 10.3280/EI2014-001001