The digital innovation and institutional sustainability circuit. A scheme for evaluating the effects on the labour

Journal title CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Author/s Gaetano Fausto Esposito
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/1 Language Italian
Pages 26 P. 75-100 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds1-2021oa10535
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper investigates the impact of digital technologies on the labour by designing a qualitative model based on the concept of institutional sustainability; the latter is meant as a circuit in which the institutional frame allows the deployment of individual freedoms and skills, and the promotion of greater equity and inclusion allows to seize the opportunities available. More specifically, the analysis focuses on the impact of digitalization on Objective 8 of the Sustainable Development Goals developed for the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Relying on the qualitative analysis of the existing literature, despite the need of further investigations, we conclude that digitalization has a negative impact on employment in the short run if evaluated in terms of institutional sustainability, in particular for low and medium-level skill of routine nature. As a consequence, policies of empowerment and digital re-skilling of human capital are necessary, even at company level, to avoid the phenomenon of digital exclusion (i.e. e-exclusion).

Keywords: Digitalization, institutional sustainability; Sustainable Development Goal; labour; inequality

  1. Acemoglu D., Autor D.H. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implication for Employment and Earnings. In: Card D., Oshenfelter O. (ed. by), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, part. B: 1043-1171. DOI: 10.2331/suisan.32.804
  2. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2018a). The race between man e machine: Implications of tecnology for growth, factor shares and employment, American Economic Review, 108(6):1488-1542. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20160696
  3. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2018b). Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work, NBER Working paper 24196, jan. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20160696
  4. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2019). Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2: 3-30. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.2.3
  5. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2020). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the future of labor demand, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1: 25-35. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsz022
  6. Arnz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. (2017). Revisiting the Risk of Automation. Economics Letters, 159: 157-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.001
  7. Arnz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. (2019). Digitalization and the future of work: Macroeconomic consequences. In: Zimmermann K.F (Editor-in-Chief), Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 19-024, 6/2019, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3413653
  8. Autor D. (2015). Why Are There Still So many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspective, 3: 3-30. DOI: 10.1257/jep.29.3.3
  9. Autor D. (2019). Work of the Past, Work of the Future, NBER Working paper n. 25588, feb. DOI: 10.3386/w25588
  10. Autor D., Katz L.F., Kearney M.S. (2006). The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market, American Economic Review, 2: 189-194. DOI: 10.1257/000282806777212620
  11. Balsmeier B., Woerter M. (2019). Is this time different? How digitalization influence job creation and distruction, Research Policy, 48(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.010
  12. Benz M., Frey B. (2006). “Being indipendent is a great thing: subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy”, Economica, 75: 362-383. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x
  13. Berg A., Buffie E.F., Zanna L.F. (2018). Should We Fear the Robot Revolution? (The Correct Answer is Yes), IFM Working paper, WP/18/116, May. DOI: 10.5089/9781484300831.001
  14. Bloom D.E., McKenna M., Prettner K. (2018). Demography, Unemployment, Automation, And Digitalization: Implication For The Creation Of (Decent) Jobs, 2010-2030, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24835 July. DOI: 10.3386/w24835
  15. Brinkerhoff D.W., Goldsmith A.A. (1992). Promoting the Sustainability of Development Institutions: A Framework for Strategy, World Development, 3: 369-383. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(92)90030-y
  16. Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. (2017). La nuova rivoluzione delle macchine, Lavoro e prosperità nell’era della tecnologia trionfante, Milano: Feltrinelli.
  17. Castaldo A., Billi A., Orzi G. (2020). Quanto è “complessa” la crescita? Un’analisi panel in 27 paesi europei, Corporate Governance and Research & Development Studies, 1. DOI: 10.3280/cgrds1-2020oa10104
  18. Cirillo V., Evangelista R., Guarascio D., Sostero M. (2020). Digitalization, routiness and employment: an exploration on Italian task-based data. Research Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104079
  19. Coblentz J.B. (2002). Organizational Sustainability: The Three Aspects that Matter, paper present. ERNWACA’s First Strategy Session, Dakar.
  20. Commissione Europea (2020a). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI 2020).
  21. Commissione europea (2020b). Use of internet services. In: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/use-internet.
  22. Costanza R., Daly L., Fieramonti E., Giovannini E., Kubieszewsky, Fogh Mortensen L., Pickett K.E., Vala Ragnarsdottir K., De Vogli R., Wilkinson R. (2016). Modelling and misuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ecological Economics, 130: 350-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009
  23. Czaja I., Urbaniec M. (2019). Digital Exclusion in the Labour Market in European Countries: Causes and Consequences. Europea Journal of Sutainable Development, 8(5), 324-336. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n5p324
  24. Dachs B. (2017). The impact of new technologies on the labour market and the social economy, MPRA, paper n. 90519, june.
  25. Dauth W., Findeisen S., Südekum J, Woessner N. (2017). The rise of robots in the German labour market, Vox CEPR 19 Sept. DOI: 10.32049/RTSA.2019.4.01
  26. Esposito G.F. (2019). Sostenibilità istituzionale ed eguaglianza nelle nuove politiche industriali: schema interpretativo e di valutazione delle policy, Rivista italiana di Public Management, 2(1). In: https://www.rivistaitalianadipublicmanagement.it/sostenibilita-istituzionale-ed-eguaglianza-nelle-nuove-politiche-industriali-schema-interpretativo-e-di-valutazione-delle-policy/.
  27. Esposito G.F. (2018), Development policies for lagging behind areas: an interpretative note in the name of civil entrepreneurial development, International Journal of economic behavior, 8(1): 33-45. DOI: 10.14276/2285-0430.1926
  28. Esposito G.F., Ferri M.A. (2018) Impresa senza confini e marketing al futuro. Per un capitalismo civile e un’impresa socialmente responsabile. Milano: Mc Graw Hill.
  29. Esposito G.F., Spirito P. (2013). La costruzione del capitale fiduciario. Motivazione, imprenditorialità e libertà per una nuova politica di sviluppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  30. Evangelista R., Guerrieri P., Meliciani V. (2014), The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(8). DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2014.918438
  31. Ford M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Treath of Mass Unemployment, New York: Basic Book.
  32. Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. (2013). The future of Employment: How susceptible are Jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114: 254-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  33. Gallegati M. (2014). Oltre la siepe. Milano: Chiarelettere.
  34. Gerten E., Backmann, M., Bellmann L. (2019). Controlling working crowds: The impact of digitalization on worker autonomy and monitoring across hierarchical levels, Journal of Economics and Statistics, 239(3): 441-481. DOI: 10.15456/jbnst.2020140.144931
  35. Giovannini E. (2018). L’utopia sostenibile. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  36. Guellec D., Paunov C. (2017). Digital innovation and The Distribution of Income, NBER Working paper, n. 23987, Nov. DOI: 10.3386/w23987
  37. Guerrieri P., Luciani M., Meliciani V. (2011). The determinants of investment in information and communication technologies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(4): 387-403. DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2010.526313
  38. Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2015). The Value of Corporate Culture, Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (1): 60-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.010
  39. Habibi F., Zabardast M.A. (2020). Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries, Technology in Society, 63: 101370. DOI: 10.1177/1368431017710907
  40. ILO (International Labour Organization) (2001). Reducing the decent work deficit – a global challenge, 89th Session of the International Labour Conference, October, Geneva.
  41. Istat (2020). Rapporto SDGs 2020. Informazioni statistiche per l’Agenda 2030 in Italia, Roma.
  42. Juvanović M., Dlačić J., Okanović M. (2018). Digitalization and society’s sustainable development - Mesures and implications, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 36(2): 905-928. DOI: 10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.905
  43. Kogan L. Papanikolau D., Seru A., Stoffman N. (2017). Tecnical Innovation, Resource Allocation and Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2): 665-712. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjw040
  44. Kwilinski A., Vyshnevskyi O., Dzwigol H. (2020). Digitalization of the EU Economies and People at Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13: 142. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm13070142
  45. Lins K.W., Servaes H., Tamayo A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust and Firm Performance during the Financial Crisis, The Journal of Finance, 72(4): 1785-1824. DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12505
  46. Lovergine S., Pellero A. (2018). This Time in Might be Different: Analysis of the Impact of Digitalization on the Labour Market, European Scientific Journal, 14(36): 68-81. DOI: 10.19044/esj.2018.v14n36p68
  47. Mammadli E., Klivak V. (2020). Measuring the effect of the Digitalization, University of Tartu. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3524823
  48. Mc Affe A., Brynjolfsson E. (2020). La macchina e la folla. Come dominare il nostro futuro digitale. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  49. Musso F., Esposito G.F. (2018). Industrial Policies and Institutional Sustainability. The Case of Inner Areas in Italy. In: Mărginean S., Ogrean C., Orăștean R., eds., Innovative Business Development - A Global Perspective. Basel: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01878-8_19
  50. Musso F., Esposito G.F., Angioni M. (2019). Per un modello di valutazione della sostenibilità istituzionale delle politiche di sviluppo locale. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 4. DOI: 10.32049/RTSA.2019.4.01
  51. OECD (2007). Broadband and ICT access and use by households and individuals, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/230666254714
  52. Ordieres-Meré J., Remón T.P., Rubio J. (2020). Digitalization: An Opportunity for Contributing to Sustainability From Knowledge Creation. Sustainability, 12(4): 1460. DOI: 10.3390/su12041460
  53. Pérez C. (2017). Capitalismo, tecnologia e un’età dell’oro verde a livello globale: il ruolo della storia per contribuire a disegnare il futuro. In: Mazzucato M., Jacobs M. (a cura di), Ripensare il capitalismo. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  54. Pfahl S. (2005), Institutional sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1-2). DOI: 10.1504/ijsd.2005.007376
  55. Schumpeter J.A. (1942) (1994). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Londra, Routledge.
  56. Sen A. (2000). Lo sviluppo è libertà. Perché non c’è crescita senza democrazia. Milano: Mondadori.
  57. Summers L. (2016). A Disaster is Looming for American Men, Washington Post, Sept., 29.
  58. Tosic B., Zivkovic Z. (2019), Knowledge Management and Innovation in the Digital Era: Providing a Sustainable Solution. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 108. DOI: 10.2991/senet-19.2019.31
  59. Unece-United Nation Economic Commission for Europe (2009). Measuring Sustainable Development, New York and Geneva.
  60. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Industrial Innovation Policy (2020). The role of industrial digitalization in post-covid-19 manufacturing recovery, diversification and resilience, Cambridge.
  61. Wood A.J., Graham M., Anwar M.A. (2020), Minimum wages for online labor platforms? Regulating the global gig economy. In: Larson A., Teigland R. (ed. by), The digital transformation of labor: Automation, the gig economy and welfare. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429317866-4
  62. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future, UN.

Gaetano Fausto Esposito, Il circuito innovazione digitale e sostenibilità istituzionale. Uno schema per la valutazione degli effetti sul lavoro in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 1/2021, pp 75-100, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds1-2021oa10535