Click here to download

Diritto e natura a Oxford: il caso di H.L.A. Hart
Author/s: Carolina Gasparoli 
Year:  2009 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  12 Pg. 181-192 FullText PDF:  136 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TP2009-002010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Law and nature. The case for H.L.A. Hart - Hart is one of the most prominent philosophers of law of the last century. Published in 1961, his book The Concept of Law has influenced many of the leading figures in contemporary legal theory. Hart held the Chair of Jurisprudence at Oxford University from 1952 until 1968 and he chose Ronald Dworkin as his successor. In his last book Diritto e natura. H.L.A. e la filosofia di Oxford, Mario Ricciardi takes the uneasy relationship between the two philosophers as the starting point of his inquiry and claims that Dworkin’s critique of Hart’s legal theory has misinterpreted many relevant aspects of Hart’s approach to law. As a result, many scholars have paid little attention to the cultural and philosophical background of Hart’s work. In particular, Ricciardi suggests that, in this work, Hart uses a specific notion of analysis, namely connective analysis, which Gilbert Ryle and Peter F. Strawson had opposed to the decompositive one. Such a reading of The Concept of Law generates a new understanding of the role played by the minimum content of natural law in Hart’s legal theory.

Carolina Gasparoli, in "TEORIA POLITICA" 2/2009, pp. 181-192, DOI:10.3280/TP2009-002010


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content