Click here to download

Private agreements for coordinating patent rights: the case of patent pools
Author/s: Nancy Gallini 
Year:  2011 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  26 Pg. 5-30 FullText PDF:  252 KB
DOI:  10.3280/POLI2011-003001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Inventors and users of technology often enter into cooperative agreements for sharing their intellectual property in order to implement a standard or to avoid costly litigation. Over the past two decades, U.S. antitrust authorities have viewed pooling arrangements that integrate complementary, valid and essential patents as having pro-competitive benefits in reducing prices, transactions costs, and the incidence of legal suits. Since patent pools are cooperative agreements, they also have the potential of suppressing competition if, for example, they harbor weak or invalid patents, dampen incentives to conduct research on innovations that compete with the pooled patents, foreclose competition from downstream product or upstream input markets, or soften competition with outside substitutes that do not rely on the pooled patents. In synthesizing the ideas advanced in the economic literature, this paper explores whether these antitrust concerns apply to pools with complementary patents and, if they do, the implications for competition policy to constrain them.
Keywords: Intellectual property, patent pools, antitrust/competition policy, cooperative agreements
Jel Code: L2, L24, L4, L44, O3, O33, O34

Nancy Gallini, in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 3/2011, pp. 5-30, DOI:10.3280/POLI2011-003001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content