Click here to download

Flessibilità e tutele nella riforma del lavoro
Author/s: Tiziano Treu 
Year:  2013 Issue: 137 Language: Italian 
Pages:  51 Pg. 1-51 FullText PDF:  466 KB
DOI:  10.3280/GDL2013-137001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This paper presents a general analysis of the recent Italian legislation on employment relations and the labour market (Law n. 92/2012). It firstly examines the antecedents and formation of the Law both during the consultations of the social parties by the government, and during the debates in Parliament. The approval the Law by a vast majority of votes has not prevented divergent opinions and persistent criticisms. According to the Author, Law 92 draws a general inspiration from the European pattern of flexicurity, even though taking into account the specific features of the Italian Labour Legislation. The European directives on employees participation in the enterprise are also indicated as general principles of the Law. The various sections of Law 92 are analysed comparing their actual content with the objectives indicated by the government and with the European benchmarks. The Law improves the protection of employees in case of unemployment but the relevant measures are still weakened by the scarse effectiveness of employment services and labour policies. A most relevant innovation is the promotion of apprenticeship as the main measure to foster youth employment. The paper examines the regulations approved for the various types of labour contracts; fixed term contracts have been liberalized; on the contrary other types of «atypical semiautonomous contracts» have been subject to restrictions and made more costly, in order to limit abusive and unlawful practices. The paper examines the reform of Art. 18 of Law n. 300/1970 which provided for reinstatement in all cases of unjust dismissal. Art. 18 was criticized as an excessively rigid protection of permanent employees. According to the Author the new regulation is in line with other European systems, because it provides the judge with the power to differentiate sanctions according to the reasons of the dismissal: indemnity becomes the common remedy and reinstatement is reserved for the most serious cases. In conclusion, the paper underlines the importance of the implementation of the Law which depends on the judicial interpretations and on the future practice of collective agreements between the social parties which the Law empowers to modify the Law in various aspects.
Keywords: Labour market reform; Law n. 92/2012; flexicurity.

Tiziano Treu, in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 137/2013, pp. 1-51, DOI:10.3280/GDL2013-137001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content