Are large-scale regeneration plans favouring the replacement of poor by rich in Paris?

Titolo Rivista TERRITORIO
Autori/Curatori Félix Adisson
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/65 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 9 P. 22-30 Dimensione file 608 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2013-065003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In order to fight the problem of the replacement of the lower classes by the middle and upper classes, the City of Paris is pursuing an urban policy based on the principle of a social mix. Today, the creation of social housing in large urban development projects is perceived as the best opportunity to implement this principle, even at the cost of substantially altering existing dwelling structures and the urban context. In order to discuss the role of these projects in the transfer or the maintenance of the lower classes in Paris, this paper compares the Clichy Batignolles project, an urban redevelopment project based on the principle of social mix, with the conditions of the working class neighbourhood in which the project is set. The objective of this comparision is to examine urban development in terms of the results which the City of Paris did not envisage, on the context, in terms of social change.

Keywords:Urban development; social mix; Paris

  1. Apur, 2010a, Le logement à Paris, un état des lieux pour préparer le programme local de l’habitat, Paris
  2. Apur, 2010b, La politique de la ville à Paris, observatoire des quartiers prioritaires, Paris
  3. Apur, 2010c, Les chiffres du logement social à Paris début 2010, n. 41, Paris
  4. Apur, 2010d, Paris 17ème, éléments de diagnostic: préparation du Plh de Paris, Paris
  5. Authier J.Y., Bidou-Zachariasen C., 2008, dir., «La gentrification urbaine», Espaces et Sociétés, n. 132-133, p. 264 (special issue).
  6. Bacqué M.H., Simon P., 2001, «De la mixité comme idéal et comme politique. À la recherche du dosage social optimal dans la ville», Mouvements, n. 13, pp. 22-24
  7. Bacqué M.H., Fijalkow Y., 2006, «En attendant la gentrification: discours et politiques à la Goutte d’Or (1982-2000)», Sociétés contemporaines, n. 63, pp. 63-81 DOI: 10.3917/soco.063.0063
  8. Bidou-Zachariasen C., Poltorak J.F., 2008, «Le ‘travail’ de gentrification: les transformations sociologiques d’un quartier parisien populaire», Espaces et sociétés, n. 132-133, pp. 107-124 DOI: 10.3917/esp.132.0107
  9. Charmes E., 2005, «Le Retour à la rue comme support de la gentrification», Espaces et sociétés, n. 122, pp. 115-135 DOI: 10.3917/esp.122.0115
  10. Clerval A., 2008a, «Les anciennes cours réhabilitées des faubourgs: une forme de gentrification à Paris», Espaces et Sociétés, n. 132-133, pp. 91-106 DOI: 10.3917/esp.132.0091
  11. Clerval A., 2008b, La gentrification à Paris intra-muros: dynamiques spatiales, rapports sociaux et politiques publiques, PhD thesis, Université Paris I, Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris
  12. Clerval A., 2010, «Les dynamiques spatiales de la gentrification à Paris», Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, article 505 (http://cybergeo. revues.org/23231).
  13. Collet A., 2008, «Les ‘gentrifieurs’ du Bas Montreuil: vie résidentielle et vie professionnelle», Espaces et sociétés, n. 132-133, pp. 125-141 DOI: 10.3917/esp.132.0125
  14. Fijalkow Y., Préteceille E., 2006, dir., «Gentrification, discours et politique», Sociétés Contemporaines, n. 63, p. 140 (special issue).
  15. Hamnett C., 2003, «Gentrification and the middle class remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001», Urban Studies, vol. 12, n. 40, pp. 2401-2426 DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000136138
  16. Kazepov Y., 2005, ed., Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements, and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion, Malden, Blackwell, pp. 210-232
  17. Lees L., 2008, «Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?», Urban Studies, vol. 12, n. 45, pp. 2449-2470 DOI: 10.1177/0042098008097099
  18. Mairie de Paris, 2003, Programme Local de l’Habitat, orientations et programmes d’actions 2003-2007, Paris
  19. Mairie de Paris, 2011, Clichy Batignolles, Lancement d’une pièce urbaine majeure entre parc et paysage ferroviaire, Paris
  20. Mairie de Paris, 2012, «Créer une ville mixte et animée», Clichy Batignolles, la ville se réinvente, February, 7 (http://clichy-batignolles.fr/ enjeux-ambitions/lemergence-la-ville-durable/creer-une-ville-mixteet- animee/creer-une-ville-mixte-e).
  21. Moulaert F., Rodriguez A., Swyngedouw E., 2003, eds., The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities, Oxford U.P., Oxford
  22. Pinçon M., Pinçon-Charlot M., 2004, Sociologie de Paris, La Découverte, Paris
  23. Préteceille E., 2007, «Is Gentrification a Useful Paradigm to Analyse Social Changes in the Paris Metropolis?», Environment and Planning A, vol. 1, n. 39, pp. 10-31 DOI: 10.1068/a3970
  24. Savini F., 2012, «Who Makes the (new) Metropolis? Cross-border Coalition and Urban Development in Paris», Environment and Planning A, vol. 8, n. 44, pp. 1875-1895 DOI: 10.1068/a44632
  25. Selod H., 2004, «La mixité économique et sociale», in Thisse J.F., Maurel F., Perrot, Puig J.P., Renard V. (dir.), Villes et Economie, La Documentation Française, Paris, pp. 129-156.
  26. Semapa, 2012, «Les bureaux», Paris Rive Gauche, February, 7 (http:// www.parisrivegauche.com/semapa/paris_rive_gauche/menu_haut/ le_projet/les_programmes_realises/les_bureaux).
  27. Simon P., 2005, «Gentrification of Old Neighbourhoods and Social Integration in Europe», in Kazepov, op.cit., pp. 210-232.
  28. Smith N., 1979, «Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People», Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 4, n. 45, pp. 538-548 DOI: 10.1080/01944367908977002
  29. Smith N., 1996, The New Urban Frontier, Gentrification and the Revanchist City, Routledge, London
  30. Smith N., 2002, «New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy», Antipode, vol. 3, n. 34, pp. 427-450 DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00249
  31. Vincendon S, 2012, «A Paris on invite les zinzins», Grand Paris et Petit Détours, February, 7 (http://grandparis.blogs.liberation.fr/ vincendon/2011/02/a-paris-on-invite-les-zinzins.html).
  32. Zukin S., 1991, Landscape of Power: From Detroit to Disney World, University of California Press, Berkeley.

  • From state restructuring to urban restructuring: The intermediation of public landownership in urban development projects in France Félix Adisson, in European Urban and Regional Studies /2018 pp.373
    DOI: 10.1177/0969776417717308

Félix Adisson, Are large-scale regeneration plans favouring the replacement of poor by rich in Paris? in "TERRITORIO" 65/2013, pp 22-30, DOI: 10.3280/TR2013-065003