Click here to download

Environmental taxation and municipal fiscal federalism: remarks and perspectives on the Italian case study
Journal Title: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Author/s: Andrea Zatti, Fiorenza Carraro 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  32 Pg. 61-92 FullText PDF:  669 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2013-002005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The debate around green fiscal reform has been going on for more than 20 years in Europe. However, to this day the focus has been mainly (or almost completely) concentrated on national fiscal systems, while the local dimension has been largely ignored. Environmental taxes, or at least some of them - final energy consumption taxes, car registration and circulation taxes, construction fees, park and road pricing, charges on tourism, land use and occupation fees - are strongly interrelated to the territorial context and, accordingly, can represent a promising tool to make citizens and city users pay for the services they benefit from or for the external effects they generate. From a multilevel governance perspective, whenever a process of fiscal decentralisation is going on or planned, major attention can be directed to the opportunity to fill in the fiscal gap, at least to some extent, through a major recourse to environmentally related taxes. The expected results (dividends) would not just be in terms of a less distortionary fiscal system, but also of a more transparent and accountable model of financing for local expenditures and functions. The paper provides a preliminary assessment on this subject, focusing mainly on the Italian experience. The categorization of environmental taxes and their quantitative analysis show how no specific attention has currently been given to the local dimension and how major research efforts still have to be done to better investigate their potential role in the context of decentralisation processes.
Keywords: Environmental taxes, fiscal decentralization, local environmental fiscal reform
Jel Code: H23, H71, H77

  1. Bird R. M. (2008). Tax Assignment Revisited. University of Toronto.
  2. Bird R. M., Slack E. (2004). Fiscal aspects of metropolitan governance. ITP Paper 0401, University of Toronto, January.
  3. Bird R. M. (2003). Local and Regional Revenues. Washington: World Bank Institute.
  4. Bird R. M. (2001). Subnational Revenues: Realities and Prospects. Washington: World Bank Institute.
  5. Cipollina S. (2009). Osservazioni sulla fiscalità ambientale nella prospettiva del federalismo fiscale. Rivista di diritto finanziario e scienza delle finanze, 4: 567-592.
  6. Clinch J. P., O’Neill E. (2010). Designing Development Planning Charges, Settlement Patterns, Cost Recovery and Public Facilities. Urban Studies, 47, 10: 2149-2171., DOI: 10.1177/0042098009357968
  7. Combet E., Ghersi F., Hourcade J-C, Thery D. (2010). Carbon tax and equity: the importance of policy design. In: Critical issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives – Volume VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Del Federico (2007). Tributi di scopo e tributi para commutativi: esperienze italiane ed europee. Ipotesi si costruzione del prelievo. Tributi locali e regionali, 2: 1-6.
  9. EEA-European Environment Agency (2006). Using the market for cost-effective environmental policy. EEA Report N. 1, Copenhagen.
  10. EEA-European Environment Agency (2000). Environmental taxation – recent developments in tools for integration. Environmental issues report N. 18, Copenhagen.
  11. Ekins P. (1999). European environmental taxes and charges: recent experience, issues and trends. Ecological Economics 31: 39-62., DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00051-8
  12. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission. EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM (2010)2020, Brussels.
  13. European Commission (2007a). GREEN PAPER on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes, COM (2007)140 final, Brussels.
  14. European Commission (2007b). Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the GREEN PAPER on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes, SEC (2007)388, Brussels.
  15. European Commission (2001). Environment 2010: Our future, Our choice – The Sixth Environment Action Programme –, COM (2001)31 final, Brussels.
  16. European Commission (1996). Tax provisions with a potential impact on environmental protection, September, Luxembourg.
  17. European Commission (1993a). Towards, sustainability. A European Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development, Luxembourg.
  18. European Commission (1993b). Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century, White Paper, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 6/93, European Commission, Brussels.
  19. Eurostat (2010). Taxation trends in the European Union, Luxembourg.
  20. Fullerton D., Leicester A., Smith S. (2008). Environmental taxes. NBER Working Paper Series 14.197, July.
  21. Gerelli E., Tremonti G. (a cura di) (1992). Tassazione, consumo, ambiente. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  22. Gerelli E., Majocchi A., Panella G., Patrizii V. (1993). Mercato unico e ambiente. Contrasto o compatibilità? Milano: Pirola.
  23. Green Budget Germany (2007). Ecotax. GBG-Memorandum, Munich.
  24. Green Fiscal Commission (2009). The Case for Green Fiscal Reform, Final Report, London.
  25. Herrera Molina P. M., Amparo Grau Ruiz M., Chico de la Camara P. (2009). Towards an environmental tax on motor vehicles (a proposal for a community directive and its community directive and its incidence on Spanish autonomous communities. In: Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives - Volume VI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. IFEL (2010). Il quadro finanziario dei Comuni.
  27. ISTAT (2010a). Le imposte ambientali in Italia. Roma.
  28. ISTAT (2010b). Le imposte ambientali in Italia. Nota metodologica. Roma.
  29. Jacobsen H.K., Birr-Pedersen K., Wier M. (2003). Distributional Implications of Environmental Taxaation in Denmark. Fiscal Studies, 24, 4: 477-499., DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00092.x
  30. Kosonen (2010). Why Are Environmental Tax Revenues Falling in the European Union? In: Critical issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives – Volume VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Leicester A. (2006). The UK tax system and the environment. London: The Institute of Fiscal Studies.
  32. Majocchi A. (2000). Greening Tax Mixes in OECD Countries: A Preliminary Assessment, Paris.
  33. Majocchi A. (1996). Green Fiscal Reform and Employment: a Survey. Environmental and Resource Economics, 8, 4: 375-397., DOI: 10.1007/BF00357409
  34. Oates W. E., Schwab R. M. (2004). What should local government tax: income or property? In: Schwartz A. E. (Ed.), City Taxes, City Spending, 7-29. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Oates W. (2002). A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism. In: List J., de Zeeuw (eds), Recent Advances in Environmental Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1-32.
  36. Oates W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 1120-49., DOI: 10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
  37. OECD (2008). Consumption tax trends 2008, Paris.
  38. OECD (2006). The political economy of environmentally related taxes, Paris.
  39. OECD (2001). Environmentally related taxes in OECD countries, Paris.
  40. OECD (1999). Taxes Powers of State and Local Government, OECD Tax Policy Studies No. 1, Paris.
  41. OECD (1997). Environmental taxes and green tax reform, Paris.
  42. OECD (1996). Implementation strategies for environmental taxes, Paris.
  43. OECD (1994). Managing the environment: the role of economic instruments, Paris.
  44. Osculati F. (2007). Tributi e altre entrate dei Comuni. Rivista di diritto finanziario e scienza delle finanze, 2: 111-148.
  45. Panella G., Zatti A., Carraro F. (2011). Land management and local taxation in Italy. In: Critical issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives – Volume IX. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd (forthcoming).
  46. Panella G., Zatti A., Carraro F. (2010). Market based instruments for energy sustainability: a national overview. In: Critical issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives – Volume VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Panella G., Zatti A., (2009). Traffic and congestion management in Italian urban areas: is pricing maneuvering? In: Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives - Volume VII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  48. Puig-Ventosa, I. (2009). The Unsustainable Dependence of Spanish Local Treasuries on Taxes and Charges Related to Construction Activities. In: Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives – Volume VI. Oxford University Press, 661-680.
  49. Vo D. H. (2010). The economics of fiscal decentralisation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24, 4: 657-679., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00600.x
  50. Weingast B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: the implication of fiscal incentives. Urban Economics 65: 279-293., DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
  51. Yabar A., Herrera P. H., Chico P., Rossello C. (2009). Using taxes and charges to reduce transport GHC emissions in the urban environment: proposals for megacities based on the Spanish experience. In: Critical issues in Environmental Taxation. International and Comparative Perspectives– Volume VII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Andrea Zatti, Fiorenza Carraro, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2013, pp. 61-92, DOI:10.3280/EFE2013-002005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content