Clicca qui per scaricare

Il problema del pluralismo negli spazi privati: attriti tra diritti fondamentali
Titolo Rivista: TERRITORIO 
Autori/Curatori: Francesco Chiodelli, Stefano Moroni 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2013 Fascicolo: 67 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  8 P. 107-114 Dimensione file:  231 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2013-067019
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This paper discusses some of the problematic issues relating to pluralism in private spaces. Two types of private spaces are analysed which raise particularly complex issues: contractual communities and shopping centres. Questions of pluralism are discussed for each of these two types of space in relation to rules for access and rules of behaviour. What clearly emerges from the discussion is the conflict between the value of pluralism and other values (freedom of contract, the right to exclude intrinsic to private property). Two possible future ethics are presented in the conclusion on the basis of which this conflict can be approached.


Keywords: Pluralism; private spaces; rules

  1. Askin F., 1998, «Free Speech, Private Space, and the Constitution», Rutgers Law Journal, vol. 29, n. 3, pp. 947-961.
  2. Alexander G.S., 1988, «Freedom, Coercion, and the Law of Servitudes», Cornell Law Review, vol. 73, n. 5, pp. 883-905.
  3. Alexander G.S., 1989, «Dilemmas of Group Autonomy: Residential Associations and Community», Cornell Law Review, vol. 75, n. 1, pp. 1-61.
  4. Alexander G.S., 1999, «The Publicness of Private Land Use Controls », Edinburgh Law Review, vol. 3, pp. 176-190,, DOI: 10.3366/elr.1999.3.2.176
  5. Alexander L., 2002, «Illiberalism All the Way Round: Illiberal Groups and two Conceptions of Liberalism», Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, vol. 12, pp. 625-36.
  6. Amin A., Thrift T.N., 2002, Cities. Reimagining the Urban, Polity Press, Cambridge (trad. it., 2005, Città. Ripensare la dimensione urbana, Il Mulino, Bologna).
  7. Baer S.E., Feiock R.C., 2005, «Private Governments in Urban Areas», American Review of Public Administration, vol. 35, n. 1, pp. 42-54, do: 10.1177/0275074004271717.
  8. Baron J., 2006, «Property and No-Property», Houston Law Review, vol. 42, n. 5, pp. 1425-1449.
  9. Bauman Z., 1999, La società dell’incertezza, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  10. Blomley N., 2009, «Homelessness, Rights and the Delusions of Property», Urban Geography, vol. 3, n. 6, pp. 577-590,, DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.30.6.577
  11. Bollinger J.M., 2009, «Homeowners’ Associations and the Use of Property Planning Tools: When Does the Right to Exclude go Too Far?», Temple Law Review, vol. 81, n. 1, pp. 269-302.
  12. Boudreaux D., Holcombe R.G., 1989, «Government by Contract», Public Finance Quarterly, vol. 17, n. 3, pp. 264-280,, DOI: 10.1177/109114218901700302
  13. Boudreaux D., Holcombe R.G., 2002, «Contractual Governments in Theory and Practice», in Beito D.T., Gordon P., Tabarrok A. (eds.), The Voluntary City, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 289-306.
  14. Brower T., 1992, «Communities within the Community: Consent, Constitutionalism, and other Failures of Legal Theory in Residential Associations », Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, vol. 7, n. 2, pp. 203-273.
  15. Brunetta G., Moroni S., 2008, Libertà e istituzioni nella città volontaria, Bruno Mondadori, Milano.
  16. Brunetta G., Moroni S., 2011, a cura di, La città intraprendente. Comunità contrattuali e sussidiarietà orizzontale, Carocci, Roma.
  17. Brunetta G., Moroni S., 2012, Contractual Communities in the Self-organising City: Freedom, Creativity, Subsidiarity, Springer, Berlin.
  18. Carta G., 2010, «La deprivatizzazione delle religioni come fatto geografico: il caso di Ave Maria Town», Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, vol. 91, pp. 144-164.
  19. Chadderdon L.J., 2006, «No Political Speech Allowed: Common Interest Developments, Homeowners Associations, and Restrictions on Free Speech», Journal of Land Use, vol. 21, n. 2, pp. 233-264.
  20. Cheung R., 2008, «The Interaction between Public and Private Governments: An Empirical Analysis», Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 63, n. 3, pp. 885-901,, DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.07.003
  21. Chiodelli F., 2010, «Enclaves private a carattere residenziale: il caso del co-housing», Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, vol. 51, n. 1, pp. 95-116.
  22. Chiodelli F., Moroni S., 2013, «Typology of Spaces and Topology of Toleration: City, Pluralism and Ownership», Journal of Urban Affairs (in press),, DOI: 10.1111/juaf.12028
  23. Connolly W.E., 2005, Pluralism, Duke U.P., Durnham. Ellickson R.C., 1982, «Cities and Homeowners Associations», University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 130, pp. 1519-1580,, DOI: 10.2307/3311980
  24. Ellickson R.C., 1996, «Controlling Chronic Misconduct in City Spaces: on Panhandlers, Skid Rows and Public-Space Zoning», Yale Law Journal, vol. 105, pp. 1165-1248, do: 10.2307/797175.
  25. Epstein R.A., 1997, «Takings, Exclusivity and Speech: The Legacy of PruneYard v. Robins», The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 64, n. 1, pp. 21-56,, DOI: 10.2307/1600196
  26. Epstein R., 2002, «Covenants and Constitutions», in Ellickson R.C., Rose C.M., Ackerman B.A. (eds.), Perspectives on Property Law, Aspen, New York, pp. 423-434.
  27. Fleming B.J., 2006, «Regulation of Political Signs in Private Homeowner Associations: A New Approach», Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 59, n. 2, pp. 572-606.
  28. Florida R., 2005, Cities and the Creative Class, Routledge, London.
  29. Florida R., 2007, The Flight of the Creative Class, Collins, New York.
  30. Foldvary F., 1994, Public Goods and Private Communities, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
  31. 114 Territorio
  32. Foldvary F., 2011, «Contract, Voice and Rent: Voluntary Urban Planning», in Andersson D.E., Mellander C., Andersson A. (eds.), Handbook of Creative Cities, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 501-516.
  33. Franzese P.A., Siegel S., 2008, «The Twin Rivers case: Of Homeowners Associations, Free Speech Rights and Privatized Mini-Governments», Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 5, n. 4, pp. 729-768.
  34. Freeman A., 1998, «Go to the Mall with My Parents? A Constitutional Analysis of the Mall of America’s Juvenile Curfew», Dickinson Law Review, vol. 102, pp. 481-539.
  35. French S.F., 1992, «The Constitution of a Private Residential Government Should Include a Bill of Rights», Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 27, pp. 345-352.
  36. Frug G.E., 1982, «Cities and Homeowners Associations: A Reply», University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 130, pp. 1589-1601,, DOI: 10.2307/3311982
  37. Galeotti A., 2002, Toleration as Recognition, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.
  38. Gordon P., Beito D.T., Tabarrok A., 2005, «The Voluntary City», in Ben Joseph E. and Szold T.S. (eds.), Regulating Place, Routledge, London, pp. 189-202.
  39. Goss J., 1993, «The ‘Magic of the Mall’: An Analysis of Form, Function, and Meaning in the Contemporary Retail Built Environment», Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 83, n. 1, pp. 18-47,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01921.x
  40. Helsley R.W., Strange W.C., 1998, «Private Governments», Journal of Public Economics, vol. 69, pp. 281-304,, DOI: 10.1016/S00472727(98)00030-9
  41. Hills M.R.Jr., 2003, «Constitutional Rights of Private Governments», New York University Law Review, vol. 78, n. 1, pp. 144-238.
  42. Kennedy D.J., 1995, «Residential Associations as State Actors: Regulating the Impact of Gated Communities on Nonmembers», The Yale Law Journal, vol. 105, pp. 761-793,, DOI: 10.2307/797199
  43. Larmore C., 1996, The Morals of Modernity, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.
  44. MacCallum S.H., 1970, The Art of Community, Institute for Humane Studies, Menlo Park.
  45. MacCallum S.H., 1997, «The Quickening of Social Evolution. Perspectives on Proprietary (Entrepreneurial) Communities», The Independent Review, vol. 2, n. 2, pp. 287-302.
  46. MacCallum S.H., 2003, «The Enterprise of Community», Journal of Libertarian Studies, vol. 17, n. 4, pp. 1-15.
  47. McHugh K.E., 2007, «Generational Consciousness and Retirement Communities», Population, Space and Place, vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 293-306,, DOI: 10.1002/psp.448
  48. McHugh K.E., Larson-Keagy E.M., 2005, «These White Walls: The Dialectic of Retirement Communities», Journal of Aging Studies, vol. 19, pp. 241-256,, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2004.07.004
  49. McPheron I., 1996, «From the Ground to the Sky: The Continuing Conflict Between Private Property Rights and Free Speech Rights on the Shopping Center Front Seventeen Years After Pruneyard», Northern Illinois University Law Review, vol. 16, pp. 717-755.
  50. Mitchell D., 1997, «The Annihilation of Space by Law: The Root and Implications of Anti-Homeless Laws in the United States», Antipode, vol. 29, n. 3, pp. 303-335,, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00048
  51. Mitchell D., 2003, The Right to the City. Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space, The Guilford Press, New York.
  52. Moroni S., 2013, La città responsabile. Onestamente liberi, lealmente governati, Carocci, Roma.
  53. Moroni S., Chiodelli F., 2011, «Dimensioni spaziali della convivenza plurale: una ridiscussione critica dell’idea di tolleranza», Crios, n. 1, pp. 55-66.
  54. Moroni S., Chiodelli F., 2013, «Pluralism in Private Spaces: Homeowners Associations, Clubs, Shopping Malls», in Moroni S. and Weberman D. (eds.), Space and Pluralism, Central European U.P., Budapest (in press).
  55. Naverson J., 2001, The Libertarian Ideal, Broadview Press, Peterborough.
  56. Nozick R., 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.
  57. Perlette V., Cowen D., 2011, «Dead Malls: Suburban Activism, Local
  58. Spaces, Global Logistics», International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 35, n. 4, pp. 794-811,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00992.x
  59. Rahe L.T., 2002, «The Right to Exclude: Preserving the Autonomy of the Homeowners’ Association», The Urban Lawyer, vol. 34, n. 2, pp. 521-552.
  60. Rescher N., 1993, Pluralism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  61. Rishikof H., Wohl A., 1996, «Private Communities or Public Governments: ‘The State Will Make the Call’», Valparaiso University Law Review, vol. 30, n. 2, pp. 509-550.
  62. Sandercock L., 1997, «From Main Street to Fortress: the Future of Malls as Public Spaces or ‘Shut up and Shop’», Just Policy , vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 27-34.
  63. Sandercock L., 1998, Towards Cosmopolis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  64. Shaffer B., 2009, Boundaries of Order, Mises Institute, Auburn.
  65. Sennett R., 1992, The Uses of Disorder. Personal Identity and City Life, Norton & Company, New York.
  66. Siegel S., 1998, «The Constitution and Private Government: Toward the Recognition of Constitutional Rights in Private Residential Communities
  67. Fifty Years After Marsh v. Alabama», William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, vol. 6, n. 2, pp. 461-563.
  68. Singer J.W., 2008, «Thing We Would Like to Take for Granted: Minimum Standards for the Legal Framework of a Free and Democratic Society», Harvard Law and Policy Review, vol. 2, pp. 139-159.
  69. Sisk G.C., 2007, «Uprooting the Pruneyard», Rutgers Law Journal, vol. 38, n. 4, pp. 1145-1214.
  70. Staeheli L.A., Mitchell D., 2006, «Usa’s Destiny? Regulating Space and Creating Community in American Shopping Malls», Urban Studies, vol. 43, pp. 5-6, pp. 977-992.
  71. Sterk S.E., 1997, «Minority Protection in Residential Private Governments », Boston University Law Review, vol. 77, n. 2, pp. 273-341.
  72. Stillerman J., Salcedo R., 2012, «Transposing the Urban to the Mall: Routes, Relationships, and Resistance in Two Santiago, Chile, Shopping Centers», Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 41, n. 3, pp. 309-336,, DOI: 10.1177/0891241611434551
  73. Strahilevitz L.J., 2006, «Exclusionary Amenities in Residential Communities », Virginia Law Review, vol. 92, n. 3, pp. 437-499.
  74. Voyce M., 2006, «Shopping Malls in Australia: The End of Public Space and the Rose of ‘Consumerist Citizenship’?», Journal of Sociology, vol. 42, n. 3, pp. 269-286,, DOI: 10.1177/1440783306066727
  75. Waldron J., 1992, «Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative», University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, vol. 25, n. 3, pp. 751-793.
  76. Wirth L., 1938, «Urbanism as a Way of Life», The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 44, n. 1, pp. 1-24,, DOI: 10.1086/217913



  1. Stefano Moroni, Francesco Chiodelli, Spazi urbani e diritto alla città in CRIOS 13/2017 pp. 31, DOI: 10.3280/CRIOS2017-013003

Francesco Chiodelli, Stefano Moroni, in "TERRITORIO" 67/2013, pp. 107-114, DOI:10.3280/TR2013-067019

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche