Click here to download

Against Culture versus Structure
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Author/s: Herbert Gans 
Year:  2014 Issue: 103 Language: Italian 
Pages:  12 Pg. 25-36 FullText PDF:  666 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2014-103003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Contemporary sociology is saddled with a culture structure binary but the fault for its existence lies mostly with cultural sociology. This article is devoted to four related assertions: (1) There has never been any agreement on the definition of culture, making cultural sociology a field unable to define its central concept. (2) The binary ignores the fact that the proper explanation of social behaviour requires both structure and culture; culture cannot be its own cause. (3) Cultural sociology is soft and sentimental, avoiding conflict as well as politics. (4) It neglects policy and policy-relevant research even more than the rest of sociology. Structural sociology has some shortcomings as well, however, and the culture structure binary should be abandoned.
Keywords: Culture, Structure, Social Structure, Cultural Sociology, Cultural Turn, Structural Sociology.

  1. Abbott A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Alexander J. (2006). Cultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy. In Alexander J., Giesen B., Mast J, (eds.). Social performance: symbolic action, cultural pragmatics and ritual. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Borer M. (2006). The location of culture: the urban culturalist perspective. City and Community, 2., 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2006.00168.DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2006.00168.
  4. Darity W., Gould M., Wilson W. (2011). Revisiting the debate on race and culture. Du Bois Review, 2., 10.1017/S1742058X1100043DOI: 10.1017/S1742058X1100043
  5. Friedland R., Mohr J. (2004). The cultural turn in American sociology. In Friedland R., Mohr J. (eds.). Matters of culture: cultural sociology in practice. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Gans H. (1962). The urban villagers: group and class in the life of Italian–Americans. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  7. Gans H. (1995). The war against the poor: the underclass and antipoverty policy. NewYork: Basic Books.
  8. Gans H. (2012). The benefits of poverty. Challenge, 1., 10.2753/0577-513255010DOI: 10.2753/0577-513255010
  9. Guetzkow J. (2010). Beyond deservingness: congressional discourse on poverty, 1964–1996. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629., 10.1177/000271620935740DOI: 10.1177/000271620935740
  10. Katz M. (1989). The undeserving poor: from the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon Books.
  11. Kroeber A.L., Kluckhohn C. (1952). Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage Books.
  12. Lamont M., Small M. (2008). How culture matters: enriching our understanding of poverty.
  13. In Lin A., Harris D. (eds.). The colors of poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  14. Patterson O. (2006). A poverty of the mind. New York Times, 26 March.
  15. Sewell W. (1999). The concept(s) of poverty. In Bonnell V., Hunt L. (eds.). Beyond the cultural turn: new directions in the study of society and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  16. Small M., Harding D., Lamont M. (2010). Reconsidering culture and poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629., 10.1177/000271621036207DOI: 10.1177/000271621036207
  17. Steenlands B. (2006). Cultural categories and the American welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 111., 10.1086/49950DOI: 10.1086/49950
  18. Swidler A. (1986). Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51., 10.2307/209552DOI: 10.2307/209552
  19. Wilson W. (2009). More than just race: being black and poor in the inner city. New York: Norton.
  20. Wilson W. (2010). Why both social structure and culture matter in a holistic analysis of innercity poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629., 10.1177/000271620935740DOI: 10.1177/000271620935740

Herbert Gans, Against Culture versus Structure in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 103/2014, pp. 25-36, DOI:10.3280/SUR2014-103003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content