Click here to download

Growing Up and Living in a Poor Neighborood: a Comparative Perspective on the Neighborood Effects in Paris and Milan
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Author/s: Marco Alberio 
Year:  2014 Issue: 103 Language: English 
Pages:  25 Pg. 74-98 FullText PDF:  717 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2014-103005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The aim of this article is to examine how the conditions of a specific disadvantaged population, young people from working class households, could be endangered in terms of poverty and social exclusion in two different national and local contexts. In fact, there are specific conditions, which may vary from one environment to another and can increase or decrease these risks. We will focus in particular on social trajectories, experiences and practices of young people residing in these two relatively poor and deprived, lower-class neighbourhoods. One of our main objectives is to understand if, and if so how, neighbourhood poverty can affect the opportunities and social outcomes of the young people living there.
Keywords: Neighbourhood effects, neighbourhood poverty, segregation, young people, Milan, Paris

  1. Alberio M. (2011). Growing up in a poor neighbourhood: does it make any difference? PhD Thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca.
  2. Alberio M. (2012). Education and social inequalities in the urban space: A French example. Revue Interventions économiques, 45 http:// interventionseconomiques.revues.org/1547 Alberio M., Tremblay D.G. (2013). Les aspirations chez les jeunes de classe populaire en formation dans les entreprises d’insertion au Québec. Revue Défi, 2.
  3. Andersson R. (2003). Urban development programs in a Scandinavian welfare state: a top-down approach to bottom-up planning. In P. De Decker, J. Vranken, J. Beaumont & I.V. Nieuwenhuyze (eds.). On the origins of urban development programs in nine European countries. Antwerp: Garant.
  4. Atkinson R., Kintrea K. (2001). Disentangling area effects: evidence from deprived and nondeprived neighbourhoods. Urban studies, 38., 10.1080/0042098012008716DOI: 10.1080/0042098012008716
  5. Avenel C. (2006). Sociologie des «quartiers sensibles». Paris: Armand Colin.
  6. Benassi D., Alberio M. (2013). La povertà urbana. In S. Vicari (ed.). Questioni urbane. Bologna: il Mulino.
  7. Braennstrom L. (2004). Poor places, poor prospects? Counterfactual models of neighbourhood effects on social exclusion in Stockholm, Sweden. Urban studies, 41., 10.1080/004209804200029454DOI: 10.1080/004209804200029454
  8. Braennstrom L. (2008). Making their mark: the effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement. European Sociological Review, 4., 10.1093/esr/jcn01DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcn01
  9. Chamberdon J-C., Lemaire M. (1970). Proximité spatiale et distance sociale. Les grands ensembles et leur peuplement. Revue française de sociologie, 1.
  10. Coleman J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Coleman J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94(Supplement)., 10.1086/22894DOI: 10.1086/22894
  12. Cousin B. (2008). Cadres d’entreprise et quartiers de refondation a paris et a milan. Contribution à l’analyse differenciée du rapport des classes superieures à la mixite socio-spatiale et aux dynamiques d’auto-segregation. PhD Thesis. Sciences Po Paris.
  13. Cousin B., Preteceille E. (2008). La division sociale de l’espace milanais. Comparaison avec le cas parisien, Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome – Italie et Méditerranée, 120/1.
  14. Dietz R.D. (2002). The estimation of neighbourhood effects in the social sciences: an interdisciplinary approach. Social science research, 31., 10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00005-DOI: 10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00005-
  15. Duncan G., Brooks-Gunn J. (1997). The Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York: Russell Sage.
  16. Duru-Bellat M., Van Zanten A. (2006). Sociologie de l’école. Paris: Armand Colin.
  17. Ellen I., Turner M. (1997). Does Neighbourhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 4.
  18. Felouzis G., Perroton J. (2009). Grandir entre pairs à l’école. Ségrégation ethnique et reproduction sociale dans le système éducatif français. ACTES, 180.
  19. Forrest R., Kearns A. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 12., 10.1080/0042098012008708DOI: 10.1080/0042098012008708
  20. Friedrichs J., Blasius J. (2003). Social norms in distressed neighbourhoods: testing the Wilson hypothesis. Housing studies, 18., 10.1080/026730303200013544DOI: 10.1080/026730303200013544
  21. Jencks C., Mayer S. (1990). The Social Consequences of Growing Up in a Poor Neighbourhood. In L. Lynn, M. Mc Greary (eds.) Inner-City Poverty in the United States.. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. Kearns A., Parkes A. (2003) Living in and leaving poor neighbourhood conditions in England. Housing studies, 18.
  22. Lepoutre D. (1997). Coeur de banlieue. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  23. Leventhal T.L., Brooks-Gunn J. (2000). The neighbourhoods they live in The effects of neighbourhood residence upon child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological bulletin, 126. doi. 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309
  24. Lewis O. (1969). The culture of poverty. In D.P. Moynihan (Ed.). On understanding poverty: perspectives from the social sciences. New York: Basic Books.
  25. Lupton R. (2003). Neighbourhood Effects: Can we measure them and does it matter? CASE paper, 73. London: Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics
  26. Moulaert F., Morlicchio E., Cavola L. (2008). Social exclusion and urban policy in European cities: combining ‘Northern’ and ‘Southern’ European perspectives. In Geyer H.S. International handbook of Urban Policy, 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  27. Musterd S., Ostendorf W., De Vos S. (2003). Neighbourhood effects and social mobility: a longitudinal analysis. Housing Studies, 18., 10.1080/026730303200013548DOI: 10.1080/026730303200013548
  28. Peignard E., Roussier-Fusco E., Van Zanten A. (1998). La violence dans les établissements scolaires britanniques: approches sociologiques. Revue française de pédagogie, 123., 10.3406/rfp.1998.113DOI: 10.3406/rfp.1998.113
  29. Pratschke J., (2006). L’articolazione territoriale dello svantaggio sociale in Italia. Una nuova misura multidimensionale per piccole aree geografiche. In Saraceno C. (ed.). Disuguaglianze economiche e vulnerabilità in Italia – Rapporto biennale. Bologna: Istituto Carlo Cattaneo.
  30. Preteceille E. (2003) La division sociale de l’espace francilien. Typologie socioprofessionnelle 1999 et transformations de l’espace résidentiel 1990-99. Paris: OSC.
  31. Preteceille E. (2009) La ségrégation ethno-raciale a-t-elle augmenté dans la métropole parisienne ? Revue Française de Sociologie, 3.
  32. Sampson R., Morenoff J., Gannon-Rowley T. (2002). Assessing Neighbourhood Effects. Social Processes and New Directions in Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28. Sampson R. (2008). Moving to nequality: Neighbourhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social
  33. Structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114., 10.1086/58984DOI: 10.1086/58984
  34. Sanchez-Jankowski M. (2008). Cracks in the pavement: Social change and resilience in poor neighbourhoods, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  35. Short J.F. (2002). Crime, Law & Social Change, 37. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  36. Small M.L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  37. Small M.L. (2008). Four Reasons to Abandon the Idea of “The Ghetto”. City and Community, 4., 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00271_8.DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00271_8.
  38. Small M.L. (2009). How Many Cases Do I Need? On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field Based Research. Ethnography, 1., 10.1177/146613810809958DOI: 10.1177/146613810809958
  39. Sykes B., Musterd S. (2011). Examining Neighbourhood and School Effects Simultaneously: What Does the dutch evidence show? Urban Studies, 48. (originally published online 6-11-2010)., 10.1177/004209800810099DOI: 10.1177/004209800810099
  40. Torri R., Vitale T. (2009). Ai margini dello sviluppo urbano. Milano: Bruno Mondadori Townsend P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdome. A Survey of Households Resources and standards of living. Berkeley e Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  41. Urban S. (2009). Is the Neighbourhood Effect an Economic or an Immigrant Issue? A study of the importance of the Childhood Neighbourhood for Future integration into the Labour Market. Urban Studies, 46., 10.1177/004209800810099DOI: 10.1177/004209800810099
  42. Wacquant L. (2009). Parias urbains. Ghetto, banlieues, État. Une sociologie comparée de la marginalité sociale. Paris: La Découverte.
  43. Wacquant L. (1992). Banlieues françaises et ghetto noir américain: de l’amalgame à la comparaison. French Politics and Society, 4.
  44. Wilson W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. The inner city, the underclass and the public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  45. Wilson W.J. (2010). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public policy. In Bridge G., Watson A. (a cura di). The Blackwell city reader. London: Blackwell Publishers.

Marco Alberio, Growing Up and Living in a Poor Neighborood: a Comparative Perspective on the Neighborood Effects in Paris and Milan in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 103/2014, pp. 74-98, DOI:10.3280/SUR2014-103005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content