Verso una sociologia dell’ambiente costruito

Autori/Curatori Alfredo Mela
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2013/102 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 12 P. 19-30 Dimensione file 500 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2013-102002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The article aims to define theoretical references and topics for sociology of built environment, with particular attention to the artificial environment of the urban and metropolitan areas. A co-evolutionary paradigm of the relationships between social and bio-physical systems, states that both are characterized by internal evolutionary dynamics, and at the same time are influenced by those of the other system. Stemming from this paradigm, the article suggests that the specific objects of focus of sociology of built environment, are the interfaces (both material and intangible) through which this influence is exercised. However, the purpose is not to propose a further specialized sub-discipline, but rather to build a bridge between environmental sociology and urban studies.;

  1. J.M. Anderies, M.A. Janssen, E. Ostrom (2004), «A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective», Ecology and Society, IX, 1,
  2. W.R. Catton, R.E. Dunlap (1978), «Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm», The American Sociologist, 13, pp. 41-49.
  3. G.S. Cumming, D.H.M. Cumming, C.L. Redman (2006) «Scale Mismatches in Socialecological Systems: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions», Ecology and Society, XI, 1,
  4. L. Davico, A. Mela, L. Staricco (2009), Città sostenibili. Una prospettiva sociologica, Roma,
  5. Carocci J.A. Devine (2007), «Built Environment», Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology online (ed. G. Ritzer),, DOI: 10.1111/b.9781405124331.2007.x
  6. J. Diamond (2005), Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, New York, Penguin Book; tr. it., Collasso: come le società scelgono di morire o vivere, Torino, Einaudi, 2005.
  7. R.E. Dunlap (1992), From Environmental to Ecological Problems, in C. Calhoun, G. Ritzer (eds.), Social Problems, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  8. R.E. Dunlap, W.R. Catton (1983), «What Environmental Sociologists have in Common (whether concerned with “Built” or “Natural Environments”)», Sociological Inquiry, LIII, 2-3, pp. 113-35.
  9. S. Eden, S. Tunstall (2006), «Ecological versus Social Restoration? How Urban River Restoration Challenges but also Fails to Challenge the Science-Policy nexus in the United Kingdom», Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, XXIV, 5, pp. 661-80, DOI: 10.1068/c0608j
  10. T. Gyerin (2000), «A Space for Place in Sociology», Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp. 463-96, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
  11. M. Kärrholm (2008), «The Territorialization of a Pedestrian Precinct in Malmö: Materialities in the Commercialisation of Public Space», Urban Studies, XLV, 9, pp. 1903-24.
  12. G. Kelling, C. Coles (1996), Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities, New York, Free Press.
  13. B. Latour (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  14. H. Lefebvre (1974), La production de l’espace, Paris, Anthropos.
  15. F. Martinelli (a c. di) (1989), I sociologi e l’ambiente, Roma, Bulzoni.
  16. R. Noorgard (1997), A Coevolutionary Environment Sociology, in M. Redclift, G. Woodgate (eds.), The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Cheltenham, Elgar.
  17. G. Nuvolati (2013), L’interpretazione dei luoghi. Flânerie come esperienza di vita, Firenze, Firenze University Press.
  18. E.L. Quarantelli (2000), What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question, New York, Routledge.
  19. C. Raffestin (1980), Pour une géographie du pouvoir, Paris, Librairies techniques.
  20. C. Raffestin (2012) «Space, Territory, and Territoriality», Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30, pp. 121-41.
  21. R.J. Sampson, S.W. Raudenbush (1999), «Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods», American Journal of Sociology, 105, 3, pp. 603-51.
  22. L. Steg, A. Van den Berg, J.I.M. De Groot (2012), Environmental Psychology. An Introduction, Chichester, Blackwell.
  23. R. Strassoldo (1994), «Sociologia dell’ambiente», Sociologia urbana e rurale, 42-43, pp. 62-91.
  24. A. Turco (2007), Territorio e territorialità, in Enciclopedia italiana, VII Appendice,
  25. B.H. Walker, L.H. Gunderson, A.P. Kinzig, C. Folke, S.R. Carpenter, L. Schultz (2006), «A Handful of Heuristics and Some Propositions for Understanding Resilience in Socialecological
  26. Systems», Ecology and Society, XI, 1,
  27. vol11/iss1/art13/.
  28. C. Wang, M.A. Burris (1997), «Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment», Health Education & Behavior, XXIV, 3, pp. 369-87.

Alfredo Mela, Verso una sociologia dell’ambiente costruito in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 102/2013, pp 19-30, DOI: 10.3280/SR2013-102002