Governo dell’ambiente e razionalità neoliberale

Autori/Curatori: Luigi Pellizzoni
Anno di pubblicazione: 2013 Fascicolo: 102 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 10 P. 31-40 Dimensione file: 491 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SR2013-102003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In the environmental field the traditional opposition between state and market has been gradually sidestepped by complex forms of intervention, where both terms change their meaning. A governmental perspective, rather than a governance one, is more useful in providing indications to understand the stakes of what appears to be a profound transformation in the way humans conceive the biophysical world and their relations with it, in which the hegemony of neoliberalism and its rationality of government play a crucial role. This process challenges the conceptual equipment of the social sciences. The current «return» to material reality does not necessarily lead to an adequately critical perspective

  1. A. Barry, T. Osborne, N. Rose (1996) (eds.), Foucault and Political Reason, London, Ucl Press.
  2. L. Boltanski, E. Chiapello (2005), The New Spirit of Capitalism, London, Verso.
  3. M. Carolan (2010), «The Mutability of Biotechnology Patents: From Unwieldy Products of Nature to Independent “Object/s”», Theory Culture & Society, 27, 1, pp. 110-129, DOI: 10.1177/0263276409350360
  4. N. Castree (2008), «Neoliberalising Nature: The Logics of Deregulation and Reregulation», Environment and Planning A, 40, pp. 131-152, DOI: 10.1068/a3999
  5. M. Centeno, J. Cohen (2012), «The Arc of Neoliberalism», Annual Review of Sociology, 38, pp. 317-340, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150235.M.Dean(1999),Governmentality,London,Sage
  6. M. Foucault (2004), Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France 1977-78, Paris, Seuil-Gallimard.
  7. J. Frynas (2005), «The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Oil Companies», International Affairs, 81, 3, pp. 581-598, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x
  8. W. Laufer (2003), «Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing», Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 3, pp. 253-261, DOI: 10.1023/A:1022962719299
  9. T. Lemke (2003), «Foucault, Governmentality and Critique», Rethinking Marxism, 14, 3, pp. 49-64, DOI: 10.1080/089356902101242288
  10. D. MacKenzie (2009), «Making Things the same: Gases, Emission Rights and the Politics of Carbon Markets», Accounting, Organizations and Society, XXXIV, 3-4, pp. 440-55, DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
  11. M. Micheletti (2003), Political Virtue and Shopping, New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
  12. P. O’Malley (2004), Risk, Uncertainty and Governance, London, Glasshouse.
  13. J. Peck, A. Tickell (2002), «Neoliberalizing Space», Antipode, 34, 3, pp. 380-404.
  14. L. Pellizzoni (2008), «The Antinomy of Accountability», in M. Boström, C. Garsten (eds.), Organizing Transnational Accountability, Cheltenham, Elgar.
  15. L. Pellizzoni (2011), «Governing through Disorder: Neoliberal Environmental Governance and Social Theory», Global Environmental Change, XXI, 3, pp. 795-803, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.014
  16. L. Pellizzoni (2012), «In Search of Community. Political Consumerism, Governmentality and Immunization», European Journal of Social Theory, XV, 2, pp. 221-41.
  17. L. Pellizzoni, M. Ylönen (2012), «Hegemonic Contingencies: Neoliberalized Technoscience and Neorationality», in L. Pellizzoni, M. Ylönen (eds.), Neoliberalism and Technoscience.
  18. Critical Assessments, Farnham, Ashgate, pp. 47-74, DOI: 10.1177/1368431011423593
  19. D. Plehwe, B. Walpen, G. Neunhöffer (2005) (eds.), Neoliberal Hegemony. A Global Critique, London, Routledge.
  20. A. Prakash, K. Kollman (2004), «Policy Modes, Firms and the Natural Environment», Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, pp. 107-28.
  21. S. Rutherford (2007), «Green Governmentality: Insights and Opportunities in the Study of Nature’s rule», Progress in Human Geography, XXXI, 3, pp. 291-307, DOI: 10.1177/0309132507077080
  22. N. Smith (2006), «Nature as Accumulation Strategy», in L. Panitch, C. Leys (eds.), Socialist Register 2007: Coming to Terms with Nature, London, Merlin Press.

Luigi Pellizzoni, Governo dell’ambiente e razionalità neoliberale in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 102/2013, pp 31-40, DOI: 10.3280/SR2013-102003