Click here to download

Relational sociology, critical realism and social morphogenesis
Author/s: Pierpaolo Donati 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  18 Pg. 9-26 FullText PDF:  157 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SP2014-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This article aims to show how relational sociology, in synergy with critical realism, sees social change, understood as social morphogenesis, in advanced societies. The concept of morphogenesis (MG) in the social sciences can be traced back to organic system theory. This theory became problematic once research showed that social networks cannot be treated as systems. Along the way, the relational nature of MG was revealed ever more clearly. The new perspective is that of moving beyond a mechanical definition of the concepts of variety, selection, positive/negative feedbacks and the stabilization processes that go to realize MG. It is necessary to redefine these concepts from the perspective of a relational paradigm of MG. This article tries to explain and understand the production of society as a process of MG that takes place in terms of relational steering, which is characterized by recourse to relational feedbacks that generate emergent social effects.
Keywords: Social Morphogenesis, Networks, Relational Sociology, Relational Feedbacks, Relational Steering.

  1. Archer, M.S. 1979 Social Origins of Educational Systems, London, Sage. 1988 Culture and Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1995 Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2011 Morphogenesis. Realism’s explanatory framework, in A. Maccarini, E. Morandi, R. Prandini (eds.), Sociological Realism, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 59-94. 2012 The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity, Cambridge, CUP.
  2. Ashby, W.R. 1956 Introduction to Cybernetics, New York, Chapman & Hall. 1958 Requisite Variety and its implications for the control of complex systems, in «Cybernetica» (Namur), vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 83-99.
  3. Bateson, G.
  4. 1972 Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Northvale, New Jersey, Jason Aronson Inc.
  5. Bearman, P.
  6. 1993 Relations into Rhetorics. Local Elite Social Structure in Norfolk, England, 1540-1640, New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University Press.
  7. Bhaskar, R.
  8. 1989 The Possibility of Naturalism, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf. Buckley, W.
  9. 1967 Sociology and Modern System Theory, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
  10. Crossley, N. 2012 Towards Relational Sociology, London and New York, Routledge Donati, P. 1991 Teoria relazionale della società, Milano, FrancoAngeli. 2004 Esplorare una galassia: il privato sociale come fenomeno emergente, in P. Donati, I. Colozzi (eds.), Il privato sociale che emerge: realtà e dilemmi, Bologna, il Mulino, pp. 21-54. 2011 Relational Sociology. A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, London and New York, Routledge. 2012 How to cope with family transitions when society becomes an unbound morphogenesis, in E. Scabini, G. Rossi (eds.), Family Transitions and Families in Transition, Milano, Vita e Pensiero, pp. 29-47. Elias N. 1978 What is sociology ?, London, Hutchinson.
  11. Fox Keller, E. 2000 The Century of the Gene, Harvard, Harvard University Press. 2005 The century beyond the gene, in «Journal of Biosciences», Indian Academy of Sciences, vol. 30. n. 1, pp. 3–10.
  12. Fuhse, J.A. 2003 Systeme, Netzwerke, Identitäten. Die Konstitution sozialer renzziehungen am Beispiel amerikanischer Straßengangs, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften Abteilung für Soziologie, Universität Stuttgart. 2009 The Communicative Construction of Actors in Networks, in «Soziale
  13. Systeme: Zeitschrift für soziologische Theorie», vol. 15, n. 2.
  14. Gustafsson, J.E. 2011 An Extended Framework for Preference Relation, in «Economics and Philosophy», vol. 27, pp. 101-108.
  15. Hofkirchner, W.
  16. 2013 Self-Organization as the Mechanism of Development and Evolution in Social Systems, in M.S. Archer (ed.), Social Morphogenesis, New York, Springer, pp. 125-143. In ‘t Veld R.J., Termeer C., Schaap L., and van Twist M. (eds.) 1991 Autopoiesis and Configuration Theory: New Approaches to Societal Steering, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer. Latour, B.
  17. 2005 Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Lawson, T.
  18. 2013 Emergence and Morphogenesis: Causal Reduction and Downward Causation?, in M.S. Archer (ed.), Social Morphogenesis, New York, Springer, pp. 61-84.
  19. Lorrain, F. and White, H. C. 1971 Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks, in «The Journal of mathematical sociology», 1 (reprint in M. Kilduff, A.V. Shipilov, Organizational Networks, vol. 1, London, Sage, 2011). Luhmann, N. 1988a Warum AGIL? in «Kölner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», Jg. 40, pp. 127-139.
  20. 1988b Grenzen der Steuerung, in Id., Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp Verlag, Chapter 10. 1995 Social Systems, Stanford Ca., Stanford University Press.
  21. Maruyama, M. 1960 Morphogenesis and Morphostasis, in «Methodos», vol. 12, n. 48, pp. 251-296. Parsons, T. 1978 A Paradigm of the Human Condition, in Id., Action Theory and the Human Condition, New York, Free Press, pp. 352-434.
  22. Prandini, R. 2011 Transcendental realism and critical naturalism in Roy Bhaskar: the return of ontology in scientific social research, in A. Maccarini, E. Morandi, R. Prandini (eds.), Sociological Realism, London, Routledge, pp. 30-56. Sawyer, R. K.
  23. 2004 The Mechanisms of Emergence, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», vol. 34, n. 2, pp. 260-282. 2005 Social Emergence: Societies As Complex Systems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  24. Stevenson, W.B., Greenberg, D. 2000 Agency and social networks: strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity, in «Administrative Science Quarterly», vol. 45, n. 4, pp. 651-678.
  25. Tam, T. 1989 Demarcating the Boundaries Between Self and the Social: The Anatomy of Centrality in Social Networks, in «Social Networks», vol. 11, n. 4, pp. 387-401.
  26. Teubner, G. 2011 A Constitutional Moment. The Logics of ‘Hit the Bottom’, in P. Kjaer, G. Teubner (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation, Oxford, Hart.
  27. Termeer, C. 2007 Vital differences. On public leadership and societal innovation, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Social Science Group. Zeuner, L. 1999 Review essay - Margaret Archer on Structural and Cultural Morphogenesis, in «Acta Sociologica», vol. 42, n. 1, pp. 79-86.

Pierpaolo Donati, in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2014, pp. 9-26, DOI:10.3280/SP2014-001002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content