Credit availability and propensity to innovate of small and medium enterprises

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE
Autori/Curatori Andrea Bellucci, Ilario Favaretto, Germana Giombini
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/4 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 24 P. 27-50 Dimensione file 95 KB
DOI 10.3280/POLI2014-004003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

We aim to analyze the impact of credit availability on firms’ probability to innovate. Using detailed information on more than five thousand five hundred credit lines to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), we find that innovative activities are positively affected by measures of bank loan availability. Further, estimates also show that firms located in an industrial district have higher probability to be innovative than other firms. Our results support the idea that Italian institutions should undertake and reinforce an economic policy oriented to sustain the access to credit of SMEs as a key element for the growth and development of innovative firms.

Keywords:Imprese innovative, probabilità di innovazione, credito d’accesso

Jel codes:D22, D40, G21

  1. Alessandrini P., Presbitero A.F., Zazzaro A. 2010. Bank size or distance: what hampers innovation adoption by SMEs? Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (6): 845-881.
  2. Almus M., Czarnitzki D. 2003. The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21 (2): 226-236.
  3. Amore M.D., Schneider C., Zaldokas A. 2013. Credit supply and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (3): 835-855.
  4. Bank of Italy. 2013. Annual Report. Bank of Italy: Roma.
  5. Bellucci A., Borisov A., Zazzaro A. 2013. Do banks price discriminate spatially? Evidence from small business lending in local credit markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37 (11): 4183-4197.
  6. Bellucci A., Favaretto I., Giombini G. 2014. Does innovation affect credit access? New empirical evidence from italian small business lending. IAW Discussion Papers 104.
  7. Belussi F., Pilotti L. 2002. Learning and innovation by networking within the Italian industrial district: the development of an explorative analytical model. Sinergie, 20 (58): 3-43.
  8. Benfratello L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. 2008. Banks and innovation: microeconometric evidence on Italian firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 90 (2): 197-217.
  9. Berger A.N., Udell G.F. 1998. The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cicle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22: 613-674.
  10. Brancati E. 2014. Innovation, financial constraints and relationship lending: evidence from Italy during the recent crises. MPRA Paper 53031.
  11. Brierley P. 2001. The financing of technology-based small firms. A review of the literature. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 41 (1): 64-76.
  12. Calcagnini G., Favaretto I., Giombini G. 2011. Financial models of small innovative firms: an empirical investigation, in Calcagnini G., Favaretto I. (eds.) The Economics of Small Businesses. An International Perspective. Springer-Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2623-4_9.CalcagniniG.,FerrandoA.,GiombiniG.2014.Multiplemarketimperfections,firmprofitabilityandinvestment.EuropeanJournalofLawandEconomics,forthcoming
  13. Campello M., Giambona E., Graham J.R., Harvey C.R. 2010. Liquidity management and corporate investment decision during financial crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24 (6): 1944-1979.
  14. Canepa A., Stoneman P. 2002. Financial constraints on innovations: a European crosscountry study. Kiel Institute of World Economics Working Paper 02-11.
  15. Canepa A., Stoneman P. 2008. Financial constraints to innovation in the UK: evidence from CIS2 and CIS3. Oxford Economic Papers, 60 (4): 711-730.
  16. Cetorelli N. 1999. Competitive analysis in banking: appraisal of the methodologies. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, 23 (1): 2-15.
  17. Chiarvesio M., Di Maria E. 2009. ICT and innovation processes in SMEs inside and outside districts. Marco Fanno Working Paper 100.
  18. Cohen W.M., Klepper S. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106 (437): 925-951.
  19. Cole R., Wolken J.D. 1995. Financial services used by small businesses: evidence from the 1993 national survey of small business finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 81 (7): 629-667.
  20. Colombo M., Grilli L. 2007. Funding gaps? Access to bank loans by high-tech startups. Small Business Economics, 29 (1-2): 25-46.
  21. Costanzo G.D., Silipo D., Succurro M. 2013. Over-indebtedness and innovation: sole preliminary results. Università della Calabria Working Paper 4/2013.
  22. Czarnitzki D., Hottenrott H. 2011. R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics, 36 (1): 65-83.
  23. ECB. 2009. Survey on the Access to Finance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Euro Area. European Central Bank: Frankfurt am Main.
  24. Favaretto I., Zanfei A. 2007. Rapporto finale 2007. Innovazione e centri di ricerca nelle Marche. Università di Urbino: Urbino.
  25. Ferri G., Rotondi Z. 2006. Does finance matter in the re-specialization of Italy’s industrial districts?, in Bracchi G., Masciandaro D. (eds.) XI Report on the Italian Financial System. Bancaria Editrice: Milano.
  26. Freel M.S. 2007. Are small innovators credit rationed? Small Business Economics, 28 (1): 23-35.
  27. Giannetti C. 2012. Relationship lending and firm innovativeness. Journal of Empirical Finance, 19 (5): 762-781.
  28. Giudici G., Paleari S. 2000. The provision of finance to innovation: a survey conducted among Italian technology-based small firms. Small Business Economics, 14 (1):
  29. 37-53.
  30. Gorg H., Strobl E. 2007. The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74 (294): 215-234.
  31. Guiso L. 1998. High-tech firms and credit rationing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35 (1): 39-59.
  32. Hall B.H. 2009. The financing of R&D and innovation. NBER Working Paper 15325. Herrera A.M., Minetti R. 2007. Informed finance and technological change: evidence from credit relationships. Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (1): 223-269. Istat. 2007. La demografia d’impresa. Istat: Roma.
  33. Jensen M., Meckling W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305-360.
  34. Liberti J.M., Mian A.R. 2009. Estimating the effect of hierarchies on information use. Review of Financial Studies, 22 (10): 4057-4090.
  35. Lins K., Servaes H., Tufano P. 2010. What drives corporate liquidity? An international survey of cash holdings and lines of credit. Journal of Financial Economics, 98: 160-176.
  36. Magri S. 2013. Does issuing equity help R&D activities? Evidence from non-public Italian high-tech manufacturing firms. SSRN Working Papers 2309909.
  37. Mohnen P., Röller L.H. 2005. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 49 (6): 1431-1450.
  38. OECD. 2006. Risk Capital and Innovative SMEs, in The SME Financing Gap: Theory and Evidence. OECD: Paris.
  39. Petersen M.A., Rajan R.G. 1995. The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2): 407-443.
  40. Robb A. 2010. Sources of Financing for New Technology Firms: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey. Kauffman Foundation: Kansas City.
  41. Savignac F. 2006. The impact of financial constraints on innovation: evidence from French manufacturing firms. Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques 42.
  42. Scherer F.M. 1965. Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55 (5): 1097-1125.
  43. van Waarded F. 2001. Institutions and innovation: the legal environment of innovating firms. Organization Studies, 22 (5): 765-795.
  44. Vaona A., Pianta M. 2008. Firm size and innovation in European manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 30 (3): 283-299.
  45. Xie W., Mansky C.F. 1989. The logit model and response-based samples. Sociological Methods & Research, 17 (3): 283-302.

  • Green Investment Challenges in European Firms: Internal vs. External Resources Andrea Bacchiocchi, Alessandro Bellocchi, Germana Giombini, in Sustainability /2024 pp.496
    DOI: 10.3390/su16020496
  • A more German Italy? Competition and the development of relationship lending Francesco Stolfi, in Review of International Political Economy /2018 pp.553
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2018.1480514

Andrea Bellucci, Ilario Favaretto, Germana Giombini, Credit availability and propensity to innovate of small and medium enterprises in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 4/2014, pp 27-50, DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-004003