Click here to download

L’uso del disegno per esplorare il campo analitico duale´gruppale nell’analisi infantile
Journal Title: SETTING 
Author/s: Elena Molinari 
Year:  2013 Issue: 36 Language: Italian 
Pages:  23 Pg. 91-113 FullText PDF:  324 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SET2013-036003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Awareness that the child is part of a complex relational system has ensured that all child analysts agree on the necessity of establishing a therapeutic alliance with the parents. Unconscious conflictual dynamics involve the child analyst and include him, from the time of the initial consultation, in an analytic field that is closer to that of a group than to the bi-personal set-up of therapy with adults. Through a clinical example, the author hypothesizes that the child’s drawings and play can be viewed as tools capable of mapping the unconscious emotions present in an analytic field that extends beyond the analyst-child couple. Play and drawings can be used in the relationship with the parents not in an explanatory sense, but as a probe with which to explore the universe of unconscious emotions present in the group field. The images or the story of the play used with this particular modality prove to be an attractive pathway that is effective in facilitating the alpha function of each of the members of the group. Furthermore, in this sense, they create the conditions for an occasion through which the parents can become more aware of their own unconscious emotions that have been entrusted to the child and expressed through his symptomatology. The possibility for the little group of subjects involved in a child analysis for oscillation in a dual-group field permits not only a shared experience of knowledge, but also a shared creativity aimed at knowledge of emotional truth.

  1. Altman N. (2000), “Relational horizons in child psychoanalysis”, Journal of Infant, Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2: 29-38.
  2. Ambrosiano L. (1998). “L’intreccio tra teoria ed esperienza clinica” [Intertwining between theory and clinic experience], Rivista Psicoanal., 44:41-66.
  3. Badoni M. (2002), “Parents and Their Child-and The Analyst in the Middle”, Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 83:1111-1131.
  4. Baranger M., Baranger W. (1961-2), “La situacion analitica como campo dinamico” [Analytic situation as dynamic field], Rev Urug Psicoanál, 4 (1): 3-54.
  5. Bion W.R. (1961), “Experiences in Groups”, Tavistock, London.
  6. Bion W.R. (1970), Attention and Interpretation., 1-130, Tavistock, London.
  7. Bleger J. (1967), Simbiosis y Ambiguedad [Symbiosis and ambiguity], Paidos, Buenos Aires.
  8. Bonaminio V., Carratelli T., Giannotti A. (1989), “Equilibrio e rottura dell’equilibrio nella relazione tra fantasie inconsce dei genitori e sviluppo normale e patologico del bambino”, ed. orig. Equilibrium and rupture of the equilibrium in the relation between patients’ unconscious fantasies and the child’s normal and pathological development, in Bertohm
  9. M., Neri F., Salseberg-Wittenberg. Fantasie dei genitori e psicopatologia dei figli; ed. orig. Parents’ fantasies and psychopathology of the children, Borla, Roma, 67-89.
  10. Chazan S.E. (2006), “Searching for Togetherness: The Simultaneous Treatment of a Mother and her Early Adolescent Daughter”, Psychoanal. Inq., 26: 70-91.
  11. Corrao F. (1971), Introduction to Experiences in Groups (tr. it.), Armando, Roma.
  12. Corrao F. (1993), Dualegruppale [ Dualgroup setting], Orme II, Cortina, 1998, 166-183.
  13. Corrao F. (1989), “Morphology and Transformations of Psychoanalytic Models”, Rivista Psicoanal., 35: 512-544.
  14. Fairbairn, W.D. (1952), Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality, Tavistock Publications Limited, London.
  15. Ferro A. (2005), “Which Reality in the Psychoanalytic Session?”, Psychoanal Q., 74:
  16. 421-442. Ferro A. (2008), “The Patient as the Analyst’s Best Colleague: Transformation into a Dream and Narrative Transformations”, Ital. Psychoanal. Annu., 2: 199-205.
  17. Frankel J.B. (1998), “The Play’s the Thing How the Essential Processes of Therapy Are Seen Most Clearly in Child Therapy”, Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 149-182.
  18. Goldberg P. (1995), “‘Successful’ Dissociation, Pseudovitality, and Inauthentic Use of the Senses”, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5: 493-510.
  19. Grotstein J.S. (2004), “The seventh servant”, Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85: 1081-1101.
  20. Grotstein J.S. (2000), “Some Considerations of “Hate” and a Reconsideration of the Death Instinct”, Psychoanal. Inq., 20: 462-480.
  21. Guntrip H. (1968), Schizoid phenomena, object-relations and the self, International Universities Press, Madison, CT.
  22. Jacobs T.J. (1996), “On therapeutic interventions in the analysis of certain ‘unanalyzable’ patients lessons from child and adolescent technique”, Contemp. Psychoanal., 32: 215-235.
  23. Galatzer-Levy R.M. (2008), “The Nuts and Bolts of Child Psychoanalysis”, Ann. Psychoanal., 36: 189-202.
  24. Grinberg L. (1997), “Is The Transference Feared By The Psychoanalyst?”, Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 78: 1-14.
  25. Hellman I., Grinberg R., James M., Maenchen A., Solnit A.J., Kestemberg E. (1972), “Panel on ‘The Role of Aggression in Child Analysis’”, Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 53:321- 323.
  26. Hopkins L.B. (2000), “Masud Khan’s Application of Winnicott’s “Play” Techniques to Analytic Consultation and Treatment of Adults”, Contemp. Psychoanal., 36: 639-663.
  27. Kaes R. (2009), Les alliances incoscientes. Dunod, Paris.
  28. Novick K. & Novick, J. (2005). Working with parents makes therapy work, Jason Aronson, New York.
  29. Neri C. (2002), “Libere associazioni, catene associative e pensiero di gruppo” [Free associations, associative chains and group thought], Rivista Psicoanal., 48: 387-402.
  30. Ogden T.H. (2007), “On talking-as-dreaming”, Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 88: 575-589.
  31. Otte M.J. (1999), “The Child Psychoanalyst as Clinician: The Perils of Parental Projection”, Ann. Psychoanal., 26: 201-217.
  32. Sugarman A. (2003), “Dimensions of the Child Analyst’s Role as a Developmental Object: Affect Regulation and Limit Setting”, Psychoanal. St. Child, 58: 189-213.
  33. Vallino D (2010), Fare psicoanalisi con genitori e bambini, ed. orig. Consultation with the Child and His Parents; Roma, Borla.
  34. Weiss S. (1995), “On the Resistance to Child Analysis: Problems of the Parent and the Analyst”, Ann. Psychoanal., 23: 79-91.
  35. Winnicott D.W. (1947), “Hate in the countertransference”, Collected papers: through pediatrics to psychoanalysis, Thavistock Publications Ltd, 1958, 194-203.
  36. Winnicott D.W. (1963), “Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites”, The maturational Processes and the facilitating environment: studies in the theory of emotional development, Hogarth Press, New York, 1965.

Elena Molinari, in "SETTING" 36/2013, pp. 91-113, DOI:10.3280/SET2013-036003


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content