Click here to download

Definizione delle priorità di intervento in sanità: approcci socio-tecnici a confronto
Journal Title: MECOSAN 
Author/s: Barbara Bini, Milena Vainieri, Sabina Nuti 
Year:  2015 Issue: 93 Language: Italian 
Pages:  25 Pg. 49-73 FullText PDF:  1088 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MESA2015-023004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Increasing responsibility of local authorities and increasing budget constraints raised interest in the implementation of socio-technical approaches for priority setting, such as PBMA and STAR. In this paper we compare these approaches in terms of techniques and decisional process used (phases, actors involved, length), providing examples of application in national and international contexts (Canada, UK and Tuscany). These approaches offer useful insights for the Italian healthcare sector on the improvement of the resource allocation process and the sharing and spreading of improvement initiatives, through an enhanced collaboration among decision makers, managers and professionals.
Keywords: Priority setting, decisionmaking, socio-technical approaches, professionals engagemen, PBMA, STAR.

  1. Abernethy M., Stoelwinder J.U. (1995). The Role of Professional Control in the Management of Complex Organizations. Accounting, organizations and Society, 20 (1): 1-17., DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(94)E0017-O
  2. Airoldi M., Bevan G. (2010). Improvement in Practice: Commissioning with the community. The Health Foundation, London, UK. Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/580/Commissioning with the Community.pdf?realName=Qc9n8Y.pdf, data di consultazione: 03 Gennaio 2015.
  3. Airoldi M., Morton A., Smith J., Bevan G. (2011). Healthcare prioritisation at the local level: a sociotechnical approach. Working paper n. 7, Department of Management, London School of Economics.
  4. Anessi Pessina E., Pinelli, N. (2003). L indagine nazionale sul processo di aziendalizzazione: sistemi di contabilita generale e di programmazione e controllo.
  5. In Anessi Pessina, E., Cantu, E. (a cura di). L’aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Rapporto Oasi 2003. Milano: Egea, 2003: 495-507.
  6. Baltussen R., Niessen L. (2006). Priority Setting of Health Interventions: The Need for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Cost eff resour alloc., 21(4): 14., DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.943814
  7. Bevan G., Airoldi M., Morton A., Oliveira M., Smith J. (2007). Estimating Health and Productivity Gains in England from Selected Interventions, QQUIP (Quest for Quality and Improved Performance). London, UK: The Health Foundation..
  8. Bevan G. (2013). Gli elementi teorici fondant l’approccio STAR. In Nuti S., Vainieri M. (a cura di). Priority setting in sanità: l’esperienza del percorso scompenso cardiaco e diabete mellito di tipo 2. Bologna: il Mulino.
  9. Bini B., Grillo Ruggieri T. (2013). Dalla misurazione alla gestione della performance: il percorso del piede diabetico. Salute e Territorio, Anno XXXIV, Fascicolo 198, Luglio-Settembre: 138-143.
  10. Ciani O., Tarricone R., Torbica A. (2012). Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: What lessons for decentralized healthcare systems? Health Policy, 108: 194– 202., DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.09.01
  11. Dionne F., Mitton C., Smith N. Donaldson C. (2009). Authority Evaluation of the impact of program budgeting and marginal analysis in Vancouver Island Health. J Health Serv Res Policy, 14 (4): 234-42., DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008182
  12. Eddama O., Coast J. (2008). A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decisionmaking. Health Policy, 86 (2-3): 129-41., DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.010
  13. Franco A., Montibeller G. (2008). Facilitated Modeling in Operational Research. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3): 489-500., DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.030
  14. Gray J. (2013). The shift to personalized and population medicine-. The Lancet, 382 (9888), 20 July: 200-201., DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61590-1
  15. Ham C., Robert G. (2003). Reasonable rationing: International Experience on Priority Setting in Health Care. McGraw-Hill International.
  16. Hauck K., Smith P.C., Goddard M. (2004). The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care: a Literature Review. Hnp Discussion paper, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Washington, USA.
  17. Holm S. (1998). The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. British Medical Journal, 317(7164): 1000-2., DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7164.1000
  18. Kemp L., Fordham R. (2007). Road Testing Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) in three English Regions: Norfolk Mental Health PBMA Pilot Project. Newcastle, UK: Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University.
  19. Klein R. (1993). Dimensions of rationing: who should do what?. British Medical Journal, 307: 309-11., DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6899.309
  20. Macinati M.S. (2007). Le aziende sanitarie pubbliche. Roma: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Mitton C., Donaldson C. (2001). Twenty-five years of program budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 6 (4): 239-48., DOI: 10.1258/1355819011927558
  22. Mitton C., Donaldson C. (2002). Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: A survey of key decision makers. Health Policy, 60(1): 39-58., DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00190-7
  23. Mitton C., Donaldson C., Waldner H., Eagle C. (2003). The Evolution of PBMA: Towards a Macro-Level Priority Setting Framework for Health Regions. Health Care Management Science, 6(4): 263-9., DOI: 10.1023/A:1026285809115
  24. Mitton C., Donaldson C. (2004). The priority setting toolkit: A guide to the Use of economics in health care Decision Making. BMJ Books: London, UK.
  25. Mladovsky P., Srivastava D., Cylus J., Karanikolos M., Evetovits T., Thomson S., Mckee M. (2012). Health Policy in the Financial Crisis. Eurohealth, 18(1): 3-6.
  26. Mooney G., Russell E., Weir R. (1986). Choices for Health Care: A Practical Introduction to the Economics of Health Provision. London, UK: Macmillan. Mullen P.M. (2004). Quantifying Priorities in Healthcare: Transparency or Illusion. Health Service management research. 17 (1): 47-58., DOI: 10.1258/095148404322772723
  27. Norreklit H., Norreklit L., Mitchell F. (2007). Theoretical Conditions for Validity in Accounting Performance Measurement. In A. Neely (a cura di). Business performance measurement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Nuti S., Vainieri M. (a cura di) (2013). Priority setting in sanità: l’esperienza del percorso scompenso cardiaco e diabete mellito di tipo 2. Bologna: il Mulino.
  29. Peacock S., Ruta D., Mitton C., Donaldson C., Bate A., Murtagh M. (2006). Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities. BMJ, 332: 482-5., DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7539.482
  30. Phillips L., Bana E., Costa C. (2007). Transparent Prioritization, Budgeting and Resource Allocation with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Decision Conferencing. Annals of Operations Research, 154: 51-68., DOI: 10.1007/s10479-007-0183-3
  31. Phillips L. (2007). Decision Conferencing, in Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications. In Edwards W., Miles R.F.J., von Winterfeldt D. (a cura di). Advances in decision
  32. analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Phillips L.D. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56: 29-48.
  34. Rea M.A (2006). Il modello aziendale in sanità: percorsi evolutivi, primi risultati e nuove prospettive. Roma: Aracne. Regione Toscana, “Piano Sanitario Regionale 2008-2010”.
  35. Ruta D., Mitton C., Bate A. et al. (2005). Program budgeting and marginal analysis: bridging the divide between doctors and managers. British Medical Journal, 330(7506): 1501-3., DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1501
  36. Shortell S.M., Kaluzny A. (2000). Healthcare Management: organization Design and Behavior. Delmar Publishers.
  37. Schilling M.S., Oeser N., Schaub C. (2007). How Effective Are Decision Analyses? Assessing Decision Process and Group Alignment Effects. Decision analysis, 4 (4): 227-42., DOI: 10.1287/deca.1070.0101
  38. Schilling M., Schaub C. (2008). The Mara Projects: Using Decision Analysis to Create Group Alignment and Commitment in Organizations. Hertie School of Governance – working papers, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
  39. The Health Foundation (2012). Looking for value in hard times, The Health Foundation, London, UK.
  40. Thokala P., Duenas A. (2012). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment. Value Health, 15 (8): 1172-81., DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.139
  41. Wordsworth S., Donaldson C., Scott A. (1996). Can We Afford the NHS? London, UK: Institute for Public Policy Research.

Barbara Bini, Milena Vainieri, Sabina Nuti, in "MECOSAN" 93/2015, pp. 49-73, DOI:10.3280/MESA2015-023004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content