Click here to download

Improving psychological wellbeing in aging
Journal Title: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Author/s: Alessandra Cantarella, Veronica Muffato, Erika Borella, Davide Pacher, Rossana De Beni 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  13 Pg. 109-121 FullText PDF:  215 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2015-001006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


There is evidence to suggest that psychological wellbeing can be improved by training focusing on life satisfaction, flourishing, resilience and self-efficacy, derived from positive psychology. Training studies have shown that: i) the efficacy of training depends on age, suggesting that it would be particularly effective in older people; and ii) it can promote emotional competences and coping strategies in people with high levels of anxiety or low mood, even if the training does not focus on a particular psychological disorder. The objectives of this study were to analyze the efficacy of Lab.I Emotional-Motivational Empowerment training in elderly adults, comparing an experimental group with a control group (Study 1), and participants with "low" versus "high" levels of wellbeing (Study 2). Transfer effects were also analyzed. Study 1 showed a significant improvement in psychological wellbeing and some of its component constructs, and a generalization effect on quality of life (assessed with the WHOQOL) and on a working memory task. Study 2 showed a greater benefit of the training in people with a low than in those with a high level of wellbeing, with a generalization effect on a working memory task. Positive psychology training thus seems to be a valid approach in aging.
Keywords: Well-being, aging, training

  1. Antonelli, E. (2007). Il Benessere soggettivo nella prospettiva psicosociale: una rassegna. Giornale italiano di Psicologia, 24, 57-113., DOI: 10.1421/24080
  2. Borella, E., Cantarella, A., Majer, S., Mattarello, T., De Beni, R., & Cornoldi, C. (2012). Memoria e metacognizione nell’invecchiamento: l’intervento strategico metacognitivo “Lab.I- Empowerment Cognitivo”. Ricerche di Psicologia, 1, 275-292., DOI: 10.3280/RIP2012-002009
  3. Crook, T., Bartus, R.T., Ferris, S.H., Whitehouse, P., Cohen, G.D., & Gershon, S. (1986). Age‐associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change-report of a national institute of mental health work group. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2, 261-276.
  4. 10.1080/87565648609540348.
  5. De Beni, R., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Marigo, C., & Nava, L.A. (2008). BAC. Portfolio per la valutazione del Benessere e delle abilita cognitive nell’eta adulta e avanzata. Firenze: Giunti OS.
  6. De Beni, R., Marigo, C., Sommaggio, S., Chiarini, R., & Borella, E. (2008). Lab-I Empowerment Emotivo-Motivazionale. Firenze: Giunti OS.
  7. De Girolamo, G., Becchi, M.A., Coppa, F.S., D’Addario, A., Daru, E., De Leo, D., Galassi, L., Manganelli, L., Marson, C., Neri, G., Rucci, P., & Scocco, P. (2001). Il progetto italiano WHOQOL. Una rassegna dei risultati. In G. De Girolamo, M.A. Becchi, F.S. Coppa, D. De Leo, G. Neri , P. Rucci & P. Scocco (Eds.), Salute e qualita della vita. Torino: Centro Scientifico.
  8. Fava, G. A., & Tomba, E. (2009). Increasing Psychological Well‐Being and Resilience by Psychotherapeutic Methods. Journal of Personality, 77, 1903-1934., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00604.x
  9. Fredrickson, B.L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of general psychology, 2(3), 300-319., DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
  10. Huppert, F.A. (2009). Psychological Well‐being: Evidence Regarding its Causes and Consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 1, 137-164., DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x
  11. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.) (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
  12. Keyes, C.L. (2010). Flourishing. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Kunzmann, U., Little, T.D., & Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and aging, 15(3), 511-526.
  14. Livingston, G., Minushkin, S., & Cohn, D.V. (2008). Hispanics and health care in the United States: Access, information and knowledge. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166., DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  15. Seligman, M.E., Steen, T.A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist, 60(5), 410–421., DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
  16. Sin, N.L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well‐being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice‐friendly meta‐analysis. Journal of clinical psychology, 65(5), 467-487., DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20593
  17. Van Bruggen, A.C. (2001). Individual production of social well-being: an exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation, University Library Groningen).
  18. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (rev edn). New York: Psychological Corporation.

Alessandra Cantarella, Veronica Muffato, Erika Borella, Davide Pacher, Rossana De Beni, Improving psychological wellbeing in aging in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2015, pp. 109-121, DOI:10.3280/RIP2015-001006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content