Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Consigli per dare consigli: salvaguardare il benessere relazionale nelle interazioni informali d’aiuto
Titolo Rivista: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Autori/Curatori: Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli, Andrzej Zuczkowski 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: 1  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  14 P. 193-206 Dimensione file:  216 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2015-001012
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Lo studio presenta un’analisi dell’attivita del dare consigli all’interno di sequenze di troubles talk in lingua Italiana, focalizzandosi sul possibile impatto delle strategie di mitigazione e di negoziazione epistemica. I principali risultati del nostro studio mostrano che un consiglio successivo a una esplicita richiesta, anche quando non mitigato, e normalmente seguito da allineamento; al contrario, un consiglio non richiesto, anche se mitigato, e generalmente seguito da disallineamento. Tali risultati suggeriscono quanto sia importante per gli esiti conversazionali e il benessere relazionale la gestione e la negoziazione delle posizioni epistemiche tra gli interlocutori.


Keywords: Dare consigli, troubles talk, mitigazione, posizioni epistemiche, allineamento/disallineamento.

  1. Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bongelli, R., & Zuczkowski, A. (2008). Indicatori linguistici percettivi e cognitivi. Roma: Aracne.
  3. Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation, Studies in Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  4. Danblon, E. (2000). Le conseil dans la Theorie de la Politesse: reflexion autour de la notion de desir altruiste. In M. Wauthion & A.C. Simon (Eds.), Politesse et ideologie: reencontres de pragmatique et de rhetorique conversationnelles (pp. 45-52). Louvain: Peeters Publishers.
  5. Goldsmith, D.J. (1999). Content-based resources for giving face sensitive advice in troubles talk episodes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 303-336., DOI: 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_1
  6. Goldsmith, D.J. (2004). Communicating Social Support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Goldsmith, D.J., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 234-263., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00757.x
  8. Goodwin, C. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragntatics, l(1), 1-54.
  9. Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29., DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.Heritage,J.(2012b).TheEpistemicEngine:SequenceOrganizationandTerritoriesofKnowledge.Researchonlanguageandsocialinteraction,45(1),30-52.DOI:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
  10. Heritage, J., & Lindstrom, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine, and morality: scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3-4), 397-438., DOI: 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683598
  11. Heritage, J., & Lindstrom, A. (2012). Advice giving–terminable and interminable: the case of British health visitors. In H. Limberg, & M.A. Locher, Advice in Discourse (pp. 169-193). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
  12. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15-38., DOI: 10.1177/019027250506800103
  13. Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers.
  14. In P. Drew & J. Heritage, J. (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 359-417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jefferson, G., & Lee, J.R.E. (1981). The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of
  15. Pragmatics, 5(5), 399-422, also in P. Drew & J. Heritage (1992), Talk at work (521-548). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Locher, M. (2006). Advice online. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
  17. Locher, M.A., & Limberg, H. (2012). Introduction to advice in discourse. In H. Limberg & M.A. Locher, Advice in Discourse (pp. 2-27). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
  18. MacGeorge, E.L., Feng, B., Butler, G.L., & Budarz, S.K. (2004). Understanding advice in supportive interactions. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 42-70., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00724.x
  19. MacGeorge, E.L., Feng, B., & Thompson, E.R. (2008). “Good” and “Bad” advice. In M.T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in Applied Interpersonal Communication (pp. 146-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  20. Mondada, L. (2013). Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: descriptions and questions in guided visits. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597-626., DOI: 10.1177/1461445613501577
  21. Pudlinski, C. (2005). The mitigation of advice. In C.D. Bake, M. Emmison, & A. Firth, Calling for Help. Language and social interaction in telephone helplines (pp. 109-131). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  22. Riccioni, I., Bongelli, R., Lo Bue, S., & Zuczkowski, A. (2013). Self-disclosure in troubles talk sequences. Italian young adults talk about romantic problems.
  23. Language, Discourse & Society, 2(2), 135-164. Riccioni, I., Bongelli, R., & Zuczkowski, A. (2014). Mitigation and epistemic positions in troubles talk: The giving advice activity in close interpersonal relationships. Some examples from Italian. Language & Communication, 39, 51-72., DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.08.001
  24. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Shaw, C., & Hepburn, A. (2013). Managing the moral implications of advice in informal interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 344-362.
  26. Zuczkowski, A. (2004). Il counselling amicale. Bologna: CLUEB.
  27. Zuczkowski, A., & Riccioni, I. (2010). L’ascolto nel counselling amicale. In M. Mizzau & L. Lugli (Eds.), L’ascolto (pp. 83-116). Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Zuczkowski, A., & Riccioni, I. (2013). The Gestalt approach to dialogues: an integrated model of analysis. In S. Cantarini, Dialogue: State of the Art, Studies in Memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 168-185). Munchen: LINCOM Studies in Pragmatics.
  29. Zuczkowski, A., Bongelli, R., Vincze, L., & Riccioni, I. (2014). Epistemic stance: knowing, unknowing, believing (KUB) positions. In A. Zuczkowski, R. Bongelli, I. Riccioni, & C. Canestrari, C. (Eds.), Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts (115-136). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli, Andrzej Zuczkowski, in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2015, pp. 193-206, DOI:10.3280/RIP2015-001012

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche