Click here to download

Contemporary theoretical perspectives in the psychology of religion
Journal Title: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Author/s: Geraldo José de Paiva 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  12 Pg. 349-360 FullText PDF:  155 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2015-002005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This article presents some current theoretical perspectives for the study of religious behavior, that find an increasingly larger place, together with the classical theories of Freud, Jung, Allport and others, in the field of the Psychology of Religion. These contemporary theories belong to mainstream psychology: narrative psychology, attribution of causality, social representations theory, attachment theory, cultural psychology, evolutionary psychology, and new developments in psychoanalysis. Because these theories are widely known, this text limits itself to the presentation of their usefulness to the Psychology of Religion.
Keywords: Psychology of Religion, theoretical perspectives, contemporary theories

  1. Aletti, M. (2010). Percorsi di Psicologia della Religione alla luce della Psicoanalisi. Testi raccolti e adattati da Germano Rossi (2a ed.). Roma: Aracne.
  2. Aletti, M., Fagnani, D., & Rossi, G. (Eds.) (2006). Religione: cultura, mente e cervello. Nuove prospettive in Psicologia della Religione/Religion:culture, mind and brain. New perspectives in psychology of religion. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore.
  3. Belzen, J.A. (2010). Towards Cultural Psychology of Religion. Principles, Approaches, Applications. New York: Springer.
  4. Belzen J.A. (Ed.) (2012). Psychology of religion: autobiographical accounts. New York: Springer.
  5. Belzen, J.A., & Wikstrom, O. (Eds.) (1997). Taking a Step Back. Assessments of the Psychology of Religion. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  6. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’error. Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam/Avon Books. London: Papermac. Trad. it. L’errore di Cartesio. Milano: Adelphi, 1995.
  7. Damasio, A.R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. Orlando: Harcourt / London: Heinemann. Trad. It. Alla ricerca di Spinoza. Emozioni, sentimenti e cervello. Milano: Adelphi, 2003.
  8. Granqvist, P. (2010). Religion as Attachment: The Godin Award Lecture. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 5-24.
  9. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: J. Willey & Sons.
  10. Hermans, H.M.M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing societey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Jodelet, D. (2013). La perspective interdisciplinaire dans le champ d’etude du religieux: contributions de la theorie des representations sociales. In M.H. de Freitas & G.J. de Paiva (Eds.). Psicologia da Religião no Mundo Ocidental Contemporâneo. Desafios da interdisciplinaridade, Vol. I (pp. 113-136). Brasilia: Universa.
  12. Jones, J.W. (1997). Playing and Believing. The Uses of D.W.Winnicott in the Psychology of Religion. In J.L. Jacobs & D. Capps (Eds.), Religion, Society and Psychoanalysis. Readings in Contemporary Theory (pp. 106-126). Oxford: Westview Press.
  13. Kirkpatrick, L.A. (2005). Attachment, Evolution and the Psychology of Religion.
  14. New York: Guilford. Moscovici, S. (1983). Social Representation. In R. Harre & R. Lamb (Eds.), The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  15. Moscovici, S., & Mugny, G. (Eds.) (1987). Psychologie de la conversion. Etudes sur l'influence inconsciente. Cousset (Fribourg): Delval.
  16. Paiva, G.J. (2013). Teorias Contemporaneas da Psicologia da Religiao. In J.D.
  17. Passos & F. Usarski (Eds.), Compêndio de Ciência da Religião (pp. 347-366). Sao Paulo: Paulinas e Paulus.
  18. Pyysiainen, I. (2003). How Religion Works. Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
  19. Sarbin, T.R. (1986). Narrative Psychology: the storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.
  20. Slone, D. (2004). Recensione a “Religion Explained. The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought”, di P.Boyer. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 75-76.
  21. Spilka, B., Shaver, P., & Kirkpatrick, L. (1985). A General Attribution Theory of the Psychology of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 1-20.
  22. Sunden, H. (1966). Die Religion und die Rollen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung der Frömmigkeit. Berlino: Topelmann (orig. svedese 1959).
  23. Theissen, G. (2011). Psychologie des premiers chrétiens. Héritages et ruptures. Geneve: Labor et Fides. [ed. italiana: Vissutti e Comportamenti dei primi cristiani. Una psicologia del cristianesimo delle origini. Brescia: Queriniana] (orig. 2007).
  24. Wulff, D. (2003). A field in crisis: is it time for the psychology of religion to start over? In P.H.M.P. Roelofsma, J.ZM.T. Corveleyn & J.W. van Saane (Eds.), One Hundred Years of Psychology and Religion. Issues and trends in a century long quest (pp. 11-32). Amsterdam: VU University Press

Geraldo José de Paiva, Contemporary theoretical perspectives in the psychology of religion in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 2/2015, pp. 349-360, DOI:10.3280/RIP2015-002005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content