Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Il cambiamento amministrativo nelle democrazie occidentali fra new public management, modelli neo-weberiani e new public governance
Titolo Rivista: RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE 
Autori/Curatori: Rosalba Chiarini 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  16 P. 39-54 Dimensione file:  90 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SA2015-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


L’articolo ricostruisce il dibattito sulle riforme amministrative e parimenti dà conto delle realizzazioni attraverso le quali, presso i vari paesi, è avvenuto e procede il cambiamento degli apparati pubblici. Nell’area occidentale avanzata, fin dagli anni ’80 del Novecento, la dottrina del New Public Management ha ispirato nuove architetture organizzative e operative del settore pubblico, attingendo alla cultura e alla strumentazione neo-manageriale, nonché ad indicatori di performance management. Nel corso degli anni ’90, sono emerse tuttavia delle specificità nei programmi di riforma e nuovi principi hanno affiancato l’approccio manageriale orientato al mercato, quali forme di governance multilivello e nuove modalità interattive, intergovernative e cooperative di public management, o lo sviluppo di formule di partnership pubblico-privato e di forme ibride nelle relazioni fra Stato, società e mercati. L’ultima sezione dell’articolo è dedicata alle trasformazioni della funzione manageriale nel settore pubblico italiano, le quali corrono fra il principio di distinzione con la sfera politica e l’introduzione di elementi di fiduciarietà.


Keywords: Riforma amministrativa, managerialismo pubblico, rapporto tra politica e amministrazione

  1. Lippi A. e Morisi M. (2005). Scienza dell’amministrazione. Bologna: il Mulino.
  2. Merloni F. (2006). Dirigenza pubblica e amministrazione imparziale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Aberbach G. and Rockman B. (1988). Political and Bureaucratic Roles in Public Service Organizations. In: Campbell C. and Peters B.G., eds., Organizing Governance: Governing Organizations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  4. Aucoin P. (1990). Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxs and Pendulums. Governance, 3, 2: 115-137.
  5. Barlow J., Farnham D., Horton S. and Ridley F.F. (1996). Comparing Public Managers. In: Farnham D., Horton S., Barlow J. and Hondeghem A., eds., New Public Managers in Europe. Public Servants in Transition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Benz A. (1995). Institutional Change in Intergovernmental Relations: The Dynamics of Multi-Level Structures. In: Hesse J.J. and Toonen T.A.J., eds., The European Yearbook of Comparative Government and Public Administration, Baden-Baden, CO: Nomos Westview Press.
  7. Bouckaert G., Peters B.G. and Verhoest K. (2010). The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. Shifting Patterns of Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Campbell C. (1983). Government Under Stress. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  9. Chaston I. (2011). Public Sector Management. Mission Impossible? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Christensen T. and Laegreid P. (2007). Transcending New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  11. Christensen T. and Laegreid P. (2011). Beyond NPM? Some Developments Features. In:
  12. Christensen T. and Laegreid P., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  13. Christensen T. and Laegreid P. (2012). Administrative Reforms in Western Democracies.
  14. In: Peters B.G. and Pierre J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  15. Derlien H.U. (1987). Public managers and politics. In: Kooiman J. E. and Eliassen K., eds., Managing Public Organizations. Lessons from Contemporary European Experience. London: Sage.
  16. Depré R., Hondeghem A. and Bodiguel J.L. (1996). Public Servants in Transition? In: Farnham D., Horton S., Barlow J. and Hondeghem A., eds., New Public Managers in Europe. Public Servants in Transition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Di Mascio F. (2011). Come i partiti controllano lo Stato. Il patronage in Europa. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 41, 2: 291-314.
  18. Flynn N. and Strehl F., a cura di (1996). Public Sector Management in Europe. London: Prentice Hall.
  19. Fry G. (1988). The Thatcher Government, the Financial Management Initiative and the “New Civil Service”. Public Administration, 66, 4: 1-20.
  20. Gualmini E. (2003). L’amministrazione nelle democrazie contemporanee. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  21. Halligan J. (1988). The Australian Public Service Reform Program. In: Wittenhall R. and Nethercote J., eds., Hawke’s Second Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 1984-87, Canberra: Raipa/Ccae.
  22. Hood C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons. Public Administration, 69, 1: 3-19.
  23. Hood C. (1996). Exploring Variations in Public Management Reform of the 1980s. In: Bekke H.A.G., Perry J.L. and Toonen T.A.J., eds., Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  24. Kickert W.J.M. (2011). Public Management Reforms in Continental Europe: National Distinctiveness. In: Christensen T. and Laegreid P., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  25. Knill C. (1999). Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy, 19, 2: 113-139.
  26. Koppenjan J.F.M. (2005). The formation of public-private partnerships: Lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 83, 1: 135-157.
  27. Lane J.-E. (1993). The Public Sector, Concepts, Models and Approaches. London: Sage.
  28. Metcalfe L. and Richards S. (1987). Improving Public Management, London: Sage.
  29. Ongaro E. (2009). Public Management Reform and Modernization. Trajectories of Adminis trative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  30. Page E.C. and Wright V. (2007). From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations, Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Painter M. and Peters B.G. (2010). Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective. In: Painter M. and Peters B.G., eds., Traditions and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Peters B.G. (1997). Policy Transfers Between Governments: The Case of Administrative Reforms. West European Politics, 20, 4: 71-88.
  33. Peters B.G. and Pierre J. (2001). Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance. Policy and Politics 29, 2: 131-135.
  34. Peters B.G. and Pierre J. (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
  35. Peters B.G. and Savoie D.J. (1994). Civil Service Reform: Misdiagnosing the Patient. Public Administration Review, 54, 5: 418-425.
  36. Pollitt C. (1993). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
  37. Pollitt C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87, 2: 198-218.
  38. Pollitt C., Thiel S.V. and Holmburg V., a cura di (2007). New Public Management in Europe. Adaptation and Alternatives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. (2011). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Rhodes R.A.W. (2000). The governance narrative: Key findings and lessons from the ESRC’s Whitehall Programme. Public Administration, 78, 2: 345-364.
  41. Rhodes R.A.W and Weller P. (2001). Conclusion: “Antipodean exceptionalism, European traditionalism”. In: Rhodes R.A.W. and Weller P., eds., The changing world of top officials: mandarins or valet? Buckingham: Open University Press.
  42. Rouban L. (2012). Politicization of the Civil Service. In: Peters B.G. and Pierre J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  43. Sorensen E. and Torfing J., a cura di (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Talamo V. (2007). Per una dirigenza pubblica riformata (contro lo spoils system all’italiana). In: Dell’Aringa C. e Della Rocca G., a cura di, Pubblici dipendenti. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  45. Toonen T.A.J. (2012). Administrative Reform: Analytics. In: Peters B.G. and Pierre J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  46. Torfing J., Peters B.G., Pierre J. and Sorensen E. (2012). Interactive Governance. Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Van Dooren W., Bouckaert G. and Halligan J. (2010). Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
  48. Veilleux G. and Savoie D. (1988). Kafka’s Castle: The Treasury Board of Canada Revisited. Canadian Public Administration, 31, 4: 517-538.
  49. Weller P. (1985). First Among Equals. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  50. Whettenhall R. (2003). The rethoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Organisation Review, 3, 1: 77-107.
  51. Wright V. (1994). Reshaping the State: the Implication for Public Administration. West European Politics, 17, 3: 102-137.

Rosalba Chiarini, in "RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE" 2/2015, pp. 39-54, DOI:10.3280/SA2015-002003

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche