Click here to download

Parte terza: welfare aziendale e comportamento organizzativo. Welfare come work-life balance, occupazione femminile e benessere organizzativo
Journal Title: QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO 
Author/s: Rosanna Gallo 
Year:  2015 Issue: 103 Language: Italian 
Pages:  31 Pg. 285-315 FullText PDF:  142 KB
DOI:  10.3280/QUA2015-103013
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The Welfare Company was established to support social needs deriving from the permanent crisis of the last years. This chapter describes a situation in which a second welfare is the main topic, the first two paragraphs present an excellent case history. Merck Serono’s case is about a research intervention on well-being in the workplace with substantial participation from people acting in focus-groups and making proposals. The company reacted by listening closely to people’s suggestions and offered the opportunity to participate in a workshop on positive change and a well-being help desk. The second case history is about a diversity intervention for women returning from maternity leave, in order to reinforce the new double role (mother/worker) and to motivate a network and train managers to welcome them through a role consultancy process. Lastly, there is a panel of different companies presenting a large list of welfare strategies for people, including families, as well as wealth, free time and time-saving services.

  1. Greenhaus J.H. e Beutell N. (1985). Sources of conflicts between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10: 76-88.
  2. Burke R.J. (1988). Some antecedents and consequences of work-family conflict. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3: 287–302.
  3. Crouter A.C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work-family interface. Human Relations, 37: 425-441.
  4. Evans P. e Bartolome F. (1986). The dynamics of work-family relationships in managerial lives. International Review of Applied Psychology, 35: 371-395.
  5. Greenhaus J.H. e Powell G.N. (2006). When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 72-92.
  6. ISTAT (2013). Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. Roma: ISTAT.
  7. ISTAT (2012). La soddisfazione dei cittadini per le condizioni di vita. Roma: ISTAT. (Statistiche Report, 15 novembre). www.istat.it/it/archivio/74482/
  8. Kreitner R. e Kinicki A. (2004). Comportamento organizzativo. Milano: Apogeo.
  9. Lambert S.J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43: 239-257.
  10. Livraghi R. (2008) I diversi bisogni di flessibilità. Aggiornamenti sociali, aprile.
  11. Payton-Miyazaki M. e Brayfield A.H. (1976). The good job and the good life: Relationship of characteristics of employment to general well-being. In: Biderman A.D. e Drury T.F., editors, Measuring work quality for social reporting. New York: Sage.
  12. Piotrkowski C.S. (1979). Work and the family system. New York: Free Press.
  13. Pleck J.H. (1977). The work-family role system. Social Problems, 24: 417–427.
  14. Staines G.L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human Relations, 33: 111-129.
  15. Sieber S.D. (1974). Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation. American Sociological Rewiew: 567-578.
  16. Penn State e Akron (studio su 2.540 donne diventate madri tra il 1978 e il 1995).

Rosanna Gallo, in "QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO" 103/2015, pp. 285-315, DOI:10.3280/QUA2015-103013

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content