Clicca qui per scaricare

Una valutazione della rilevanza e utilità delle politiche di Ricerca e sviluppo tecnologico dell’Unione Europea
Titolo Rivista: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Autori/Curatori: Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: 3 Suppl. Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  24 P. 13-36 Dimensione file:  290 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2015-S03002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Le valutazioni dell’utilità delle misure a sostegno della ricerca, sviluppo tecnologico e innovazione (rsti) promosse nell’ambito della politica di coesione non forniscono oggigiorno risultati unanimi. La nostra impressione è che la mancanza di sistematicità nei risultati dipenda dal fatto che le valutazioni condotte finora non tengono sufficientemente in considerazione il contesto regionale in cui vengono spesi i fondi di rsti. Il presente lavoro cerca di superare questo limite, fornendo una valutazione della rilevanza e dell’utilità delle misure di rsti, prendendo in considerazione la diversità dei contesti innovativi regionali in cui queste politiche sono attuate.


Keywords: Rsti; rilevanza; utilità; crescita regionale.
Jel Code: R1, R5

  1. Anselin L., 1988, Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Asheim B.T., Coenen L., 2005, «Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters». Research Policy, 34, 8: 1173-1190., 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
  2. Asheim B., Boschma R., Cooke Ph., 2011, «Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Base». Regional Studies, 45, 7: 893-904., 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  3. Audretsch, D., Feldman M., 1996, «r&d Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production». American Economic Review, 86, 3: 630-640.
  4. Bachtler J., Wren C., 2006, «Evaluation of European Union Cohesion Policy: Research Questions and Policy Challenges». Regional Studies, 40, 2: 143-153., 10.1080/00343400600600454DOI: 10.1080/00343400600600454
  5. Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. Brussels: Report to Commissioner for Regional Policy, April.
  6. Beaudry C., Schiffauerova A., 2009, «Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization vs. Urbanization Debate». Research Policy, 38, 2: 318-337., 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
  7. Böhme K., 2008, Final Report - erdf and cf Regional Expenditure. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf.
  8. Boschma R., 2014, «Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialization: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts». Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 51-68., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
  9. Bradley J., Untiedt G., 2012, Assessing the Impact of EU Cohesion Policy: What Can Economic Models Tell Us? Hermin Economic Paper 2-2012.
  10. Brambor T., Clark W.R., Golder M., 2006, «Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses». Political Analysis, 14: 63-82., 10.1093/pan/mpi014DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpi014
  11. Camagni R., 1991, «Technological Change, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards Dynamic Theory of Economic Space». In: Id. (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter, 121-144.
  12. Camagni R., Capello R., 2013, «Regional Innovation Patterns and the eu Regional Policy Reform: Towards Smart Innovation Policies». Growth and Change, 44, 2: 355-389., 10.1111/grow.12012DOI: 10.1111/grow.12012
  13. Camagni R., Capello R., Lenzi C., 2014, «A Territorial Taxonomy of Innovative Regions and the European Regional Policy Reform: Smart Innovation Policies ». Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 69-106., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001005DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001005
  14. Cantwell J., Iammarino S., 2003, Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation. London: Routledge.
  15. Capello R., Camagni R., Fratesi U., Chizzolini B., 2008, Modelling Regional Scenarios for an Enlarged Europe. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  16. Capello R., Lenzi C., 2013a, eds., Territorial Patterns of Innovation. An Inquiry on the Knowledge Economy in European Regions. Oxford: Routledge.
  17. Capello R., Lenzi C., 2013b, «Territorial Patterns of Innovation in Europe: A Taxonomy of Innovative Regions». Annals of Regional Science, 51, 1: 119-154., 10.1007/s00168-012-0539-8DOI: 10.1007/s00168-012-0539-8
  18. Capello R., Lenzi C., 2013c, «Spatial Heterogeneity in the Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Growth Nexus: Conceptual Reflections and Empirical Evidence». Journal of Regional Science, 54, 2: 186-214., 10.1111/jors.12074DOI: 10.1111/jors.12074
  19. Capello R., Lenzi C., 2015, «Relevance and Utility of eu rtdi Funds for a Smart Growth». Environment and Planning C., 10.1177/0263774X15614655DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15614655
  20. Capello R., Perucca G., 2015, «Globalization and Regional Growth Patterns in cee Countries: From the eu Accession to the Economic Crisis». Journal of Common Market Studies, 53, 2: 218-236., 10.1111/jcms.12157DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12157
  21. Castellani D., Zanfei A., 2006, Multinational Firms, Innovation and Productivity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  22. Coffano M., Foray D., 2014, «The Centrality of Entrepreneurial Discovery in Building and Implementing a Smart Specialization Strategy». Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 33-50., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001003DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001003
  23. Cooke P. 2007, «To Construct Regional Advantage from Innovation Systems First Build Policy Platforms». European Planning Studies, 15, 2: 179-194., 10.1080/09654310601078671DOI: 10.1080/09654310601078671
  24. Corrado L., Fingleton B., 2012, «Where is the Economics in Spatial Econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52, 2: 210-239., 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00726.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00726.x
  25. Dall’Erba S., Le Gallo J., 2008, «Regional Convergence and the Impact of European Structural Funds Over 1989-1999: A Spatial Econometric Analysis». Papers in Regional Science, 87, 2: 219-244., 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00184.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00184.x
  26. dg Regio, 2006, Strategic Evaluation on Innovation and the Knowledge based Economy in Relation to the Structural and Cohesion Funds, for the Programming Period 2007-2013. Brussels: Contract n. 2005 ce.16.0.at.015. dg Regio, 2014, Glossary. www.evaluare-structurale.ro/en/k-tool/glosar-evalsed(last download 14/1/2014).
  27. Duranton G., Puga D., 2000, «Diversity and Specialisation in Cities. Why, Where and When does it Matter?». Urban Studies, 37, 3: 533-555., 10.1080/0042098002104DOI: 10.1080/0042098002104
  28. Durlauf S.N., Johnson P.A., Temple J.R.W., 2009, «The Methods of Growth Econometrics». In: Mills T.C., Patterson K. (eds.) Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2.
  29. ec-Commission of the European Communities, 2010, Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe. Brussels: com(2010)553.
  30. Ertur C., Koch W., 2011, «A Contribution to the Theory and Empirics of Schumpeterian Growth with Worldwide Interactions». Journal of Economic Growth, 16, 3: 215-255., 10.1007/s10887-011-9067-0DOI: 10.1007/s10887-011-9067-0
  31. Fagerberg Jan E., Shrolec M., 2008, «National Innovation Systems: Capabilities and Economic Development». Research Policy, 37, 9: 1417-1435., 10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003
  32. Foray D., 2009, «Understanding Smart Specialisation». In: Pontikakis D., Kyriakou D. and van Bavel R. (eds.), The Question of r&d Specialisation. Brussels: jrc, European Commission, Directoral General for Research, 19-28.
  33. Foray D., David P., Hall B., 2009, «Smart Specialisation: The Concept». Knowledge Economy Policy Brief, 9: 1-5.
  34. Grossman G.M., Helpman E., 1990, «Trade, Innovation, and Growth». American Economic Review, 80, 2: 86-91.
  35. Harmaakorpi V., 2006, «The Regional Development Platform Method as a Tool for Regional Innovation Policy». European Planning Studies, 14, 8: 1085.1104.
  36. Hägerstrand T., 1952, «The Propagation of Innovation Waves». Lund Studies in Geography, Human Geography, 4: 3-19.
  37. Krugman P.R., 1991, Geography and Trade. Cambridge (ma): mit Press.
  38. Licht G., 2009, «How to Better Diffuse Technologies in Europe». Knowledge Economy Policy Brief, 7: 1-5.
  39. ocse, 2010, Typology of Regional Innovation Systems. 20th session of the working party on Territorial Indicators. ocse, 2011, Territorial Outlook. Paris.
  40. Hollanders H., Tarantola S., Loschky A., 2009, Regional Innovation Scoreboard
  41. (ris) 2009. Brussels: Pro Inno Europe Paper n. 14, Entreprise and Industry
  42. Magazine. www.proinno-europe.eu/page/regional-innovation-scoreboard. Mack E., 2014, «Broadband and Knowledge Intensive Firm Clusters: Essential Link or Auxiliary Connection?». Papers in Regional Science, 93, 1: 3-29., 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00461.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00461.x
  43. Malecki E., 1980, «Corporate Organisation of r&d and the Location of Technological Activities». Regional Studies, 14, 3: 219-234., 10.1080/09595238000185201DOI: 10.1080/09595238000185201
  44. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2011, Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to eu Cohesion Policy. Groningen: Economic Geography Working Paper, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen.
  45. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2014, «The Role of the Smart Specialisation Agenda in a Reformed eu Cohesion Policy». Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 15-32., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001002DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001002
  46. Pavlínek P., 2002, «Transformation of Central and East European Passenger Car Industry: Selective Peripheral Integration through Foreign Direct Investment ». Environment and Planning A, 34, 9: 1685-1709., 10.1068/a34263DOI: 10.1068/a34263
  47. Pavlínek P., 2004, «Regional Development Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe». European Urban and Regional Studies, 11, 1: 47-70., 10.1177/0969776404039142DOI: 10.1177/0969776404039142
  48. Pellegrini G., Terribile F., Tarola O., Muccigrosso T. and Busillo F. 2013, «Measuring the Effects of European Regional Policy on Economic Growth: A Regression Discontinuity Approach». Papers in Regional Science, 92, 1: 217-233., 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00459.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00459.x
  49. Ramajo J., Márquez M.M., Hewings G.J.D., Salinas M.M., 2008, «Spatial Heterogeneity and Interregional Spillovers in the European Union: Do Cohesion Policies Encourage Convergence Across Regions?». European Economic Review, 52, 3: 551-567., 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.05.006DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.05.006
  50. Rodríguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R., 2008, «Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe». Regional Studies, 42, 1: 51-67.
  51. Saxenian A.L., 1994, Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston (ma): Harvard U.P.
  52. Tabellini G., 2008, «Institutions and Culture: Presidential Address». Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 2-3: 255-294.
  53. Technopolis, 2006, Strategic Evaluation on Innovation and the Knowledge-based Economy in Relation to the Structural and Cohesion Funds, for the Programming Period 2007-2013. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/strategic_innov.pdf.
  54. Varga A., Schalk H.. 2004, «Knowledge Spillovers, Agglomeration and Macroeconomic Growth: An Empirical Approach». Regional Studies, 38, 8: 977-989., 10.1080/0034340042000280974DOI: 10.1080/0034340042000280974
  55. Wintjes R., Hollanders H., 2010, The Regional Impact of Technological Change in 2020. Report to the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy, on behalf of the network for European Techno-Economic Policy Support (eteps-aisbl) http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/2010_technological_change.pdf.

Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 3 Suppl./2015, pp. 13-36, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2015-S03002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche