Clicca qui per scaricare

La governance multilivello delle strategie macro-regionali dell’ue: note critiche
Titolo Rivista: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Autori/Curatori: Davide Gianluca Bianchi 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  23 P. 5-27 Dimensione file:  235 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2016-001001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


In relazione agli obiettivi di Europe 2020, l’Unione Europea ha deciso di innovare il proprio approccio alla governance multilivello della European territorial co-operation. A questo proposito nel 2009 è nata la EU Strategy for Baltic Sea Region (Eusbsr) e nel 2011 la EU Strategy for Danube Region (Eusdr); recentemente il Consiglio Europeo ha deliberato la creazione di due ulteriori strategie macro-regionali (l’Adriatico-Ionica e l’Alpina) che interessano alcune delle regioni italiane. Si tratta di un approccio interessante e innovativo, che tuttavia conferma empiricamente i limiti della governance multilivello europea, in merito alla prevalenza delle dinamiche top-down su quelle bottom-up.


Keywords: Strategie macro-regionali dell’ue; governance multilivello (mlg); cooperazione territoriale europea.
Jel Code: H10, H11.

  1. Baltic European Intergroup, 2005, Europe’s Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Brussels: European Parliament.
  2. Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based Approach to meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Roma: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf.
  3. Benz A., Eberlein B., 1999, «The Europeanization of Regional Policies: Patterns of Multi-level Governance». Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 2: 329-348., 10.1080/135017699343748DOI: 10.1080/135017699343748
  4. Berionni L., 2012, «La strategia macroregionale come nuova modalità di cooperazione territoriale». Istituzioni del federalismo, 3: 728-753.
  5. Bialasiewicz L., Giaccaria P., Jones A., Minca C., 2013, «Re-scaling ‘eu’rope: eu Macro-regional Fantasies in the Mediterranean». European Urban and Regional Studies, 20, 1: 59-76., 10.1177/0969776412463372DOI: 10.1177/0969776412463372
  6. Blom-hansen J., 2005, «Principals, Agents, and the Implementation of eu Cohesion Policy». Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 4: 624-648., 10.1080/13501760500160136DOI: 10.1080/13501760500160136
  7. Bobbio L., 2005, «Governance multilivello e democrazia». Rivista delle politiche sociali, 2: 51-62.
  8. Boschma R., 2014, «Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts». Scienze regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 51-69., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
  9. Camagni R., Capello R., Lenzi C., 2014, «A Territorial Taxonomy of Innovative Regions and the European Regional Policy Reform: Smart Innovation Policies. Scienze regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 69-107., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001005DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001005
  10. Capello R., 2014, «Smart Specialisation Strategy and the New eu Cohesion Policy Reform: Introductory Remarks». Scienze regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 5-13., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001001DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001001
  11. Carrea S., 2012, «La disciplina del Gruppo di cooperazione territoriale (gect) tra diritto dell’Unione europea, autonomia statutaria e diritto internazionale privato: un tentativo di sintesi». Il diritto del commercio internazionale, 26, 3: 611-651.
  12. Carsten S., Peer K., 2010, eu Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Core Europe in the Northern Periphery? Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
  13. Braun G., Kovács Z. L. ,2011, «Macro-Regional Strategies: Experiment for the Renewal of Economic Policy of the European Union». Public Finance Quarterly, lvi: 79-93
  14. cec-Commission of European Communities, 2007, Black Sea Synergy – A New Regional Cooperation Initiative. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Brussels: cec. com(2007) 160 Final.
  15. Kern K., Gänzle S., 2013, ‘Macro-regionalism’ as a New Form of European Governance: The Case of the European Union’s Strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions. Agder: University of Agder (isl-Working Paper).
  16. cec, 2008, Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning Territorial Diversity Into Strength. Brussels: cec. com (2008) 616 Final.
  17. cec, 2009, European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: cec. com (2009) 248 Final.
  18. cec, 2010a, Commission Staff Working Document: Action Plan. Accompanyng Document to European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Update version May 2010. Brussels: cec. sec (2009) 712/2.
  19. cec, 2010b, Commission Staff Working Document: Action Plan. Accompanyng Document to European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Update version December 2010. Brussels: cec. sec (2009) 712/2.
  20. cec, 2010c, European Union Strategy for Danube Region. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: cec. com (2010) 715 Final.
  21. cec, 2010d, Commission Staff Working Document: Action Plan. Accompanyng Document to European Union Strategy for the Danube Region. Brussels: cec. sec (2010) 1489 Final.
  22. cec, 2010e, Investing in Europe’s Future, Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Brussels: cec.
  23. cec, 2010f, Report from the European Commission: the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltc Sea Region. Brussels: cec.
  24. cec, 2012, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Brussels: cec. com (2012) 128 Final.
  25. cec, 2013a, Working Document Accompanying the ec Report on the Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies. Brussels: cec. swd (2013) 233 Final. cec, 2013b, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Concerning the Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies. Brussels: cec. com(2013) 468 Final.
  26. cec, 2013c, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region. Brussels: cec. com(2013) 181 Final.
  27. cec, 2014, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the
  28. Regions Concerning the Governance of Macro-Regional Strategies. Brussels: cec. com (2014) 284 Final.
  29. cor-Committee of the Regions, 2009, Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the Role of Local and Regional Authorities within the New Baltic Sea Strategy. Brussels: cor. Relex-iv-020.
  30. cor, 2011, Territorial Cooperation in the Mediterranean through the Adriatic-Ionian Macroregion. Brussels: coter-V-016.
  31. cor, 2014, Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘The Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies’. Brussels: cor. C114/18.
  32. cor, s.d., Delivering on the Europe 2020 Strategy. Handbook for Local and Regional Authorities. Brussel. https://portal.cor.europa.eu/europe2020/SiteCollectionDocuments/Europe 2020 Handbook for Local and Regional Authorities.pdf.
  33. cpmre-Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe, 2013a, Macroregional and Sea Basin Strategies – Preparing the Future of European Integration.
  34. Rennes: crpm. http://crpm.org/pub/docs/398_opinion-macroregions_pb_cpmr-malmo.pdf.
  35. cpmre, 2013b, Drafting and Implementing Macro-regional and sea basin Strategies: technical Paper. Barcelona (Working paper series).
  36. Cugusi B., 2012, Macro-regions, ‘la nouvelle vague’ of Transnational Cooperation: The Geopolitical Case of the Mediterranean Basin. Roma: Cespi (Working paper 4).
  37. Cugusi B., 2013, Macro-regional Dynamics in the Mediterranean Aarea(s): The Case of the Adriatic Ioanian-macro-region. Roma: Cespi (Working paper 6).
  38. Dubois A., Hedin S., Schmitt P., Sterling J., 2009, eu Macro-regions and Macroregional Strategies. A Scoping Study. Stockholm: Nordregio Working Paper.
  39. Dühr S., 2011, Baltic Sea, Danube and Macro-regional Strategies: A Model for Transnational Cooperation in the eu? Paris: Notre Europe (Studies and Research 86).
  40. Dühr S., 2014, Scales of Cooperation, Spaces of Communication. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
  41. Howlett M., Ramesh M., 2009, Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford U.P. (trad. it., 2003, Come studiare le politiche pubbliche. Bologna: il Mulino).
  42. Iacobucci D., 2014, «Designing and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at Regional Level: Some Open Questions». Scienze regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 107-127., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001006DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
  43. Jeffery C., 1997, ed., The Regional Dimension of the European Union: Towards a Third Level in Europe?. London: Frank Cass.
  44. Joenniemi P., 2009, The eu Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: A Catalyst for what? Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
  45. Katsarova I., 2012, eu Macro-regional Strategies: State of Play. Brussels: European Union (Parliamentary Research Service-Library Briefing).
  46. Keating M., 2009, «Rescaling Europe». Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10, 1: 34-50., 10.1080/15705850802699995DOI: 10.1080/15705850802699995
  47. Marks G., 1992, «Structural Policy in the European Community». In: Sbragia A.M. (ed.), Euro-Politics. Institutions and Policymaking in the ‘New’ European Community. Washington: Brookings Institutions, 191-224.
  48. Enderlein H., Walti S., Zurn M., 2010, eds., Handbook on Multi-level Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  49. Marks G., 1993, «Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the ec». In: Cafruny A.W., Rosental G.G. (eds.), The State of the European Community. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 391-409.
  50. Mazzucato M., 2013, The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press (trad. it., 2014, Stato innovatore: sfatare il mito del pubblico contro il privato. Roma-Bari: Laterza).
  51. Engl A., 2012, «Il Gruppo europeo di cooperazione territoriale (gect): nascita e sviluppi del nuovo strumento del diritto dell’Unione Europea». Informator, 19, 3: 11-34.
  52. euco-European Council, 2011, Conclusion – 23-24 June 2011. euco 23/1/11 rev1. euco, 2012, Conclusion – 13-14 December 2012. euco 205/12.
  53. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2014, «The Role of the Smart Specialisation Agenda in a Reformed eu Cohesion Policy». Scienze regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1, 15-32., 10.3280/SCRE2014-001002DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001002
  54. euco, 2013, Conclusion – 19-20 December 2013. euco 217/13.
  55. European Parliament, 2011, Resolution of 20 January 2011 on an EU Strategy for the Black Sea. Strasbourg: P7 TA(2011)0025.
  56. Obwexer W., 2012, «Il gect come nuovo strumento di cooperazione territoriale del diritto dell’Unione Europea». Informator, 19, 3: 35-49.
  57. European Parliament, 2012, Resolution of 3 July 2012 on the Evolution of eu Macro-regional Strategies: Present Practice and Future Prospects, Expecially in the Mediterranean. Strasbourg: P7 TA(2012)0269, 2011/2179 (ini).
  58. Olsson J., 2003, «Democracy Paradoxes in Multi-level Governance: Theorizing on Structural Fund System Research». Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 2: 283-300., 10.1080/1350176032000059044DOI: 10.1080/1350176032000059044
  59. European Parliament, 2013, Macro-regional Strategy for the Alps. Strasbourg: P7 TA(2013)0229.
  60. European Parliament and Council, 2006, On a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (egtc). Brussels, eu. Regulation (EC) n. 1082/2006-L 210/19.
  61. Petrescu S., Ionescu S., 2013a, The eu Strategy for the Atlantic Area. Brussels: European Union (Parliamentary Research Service-Library Keysources).
  62. Fabbrini S., Morata F., 2002, a cura di, L’Unione Europea. Le politiche pubbliche. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  63. Petrescu S., Ionescu S., 2013b, Towards a Macro-Regional Strategy for the Alps. Brussels: European Union (Parliamentary Research Service-Library Keysources).
  64. Ferrera M., Giuliani M., 2008, a cura di, Governance e politiche nell’Unione Europea. Bologna: il Mulino.
  65. Petrescu S., Ionescu S., 2013c, The eu Strategy for the Danube Region: Two Years on. Brussels: European Union (Parliamentary Research Service-Library Keysources).
  66. Petroni G., Bianchi D.G., 2014, «I parchi scientifici e tecnologici come strumenti d’innovazione territoriale». Amministrare, 3: 459-499.
  67. Galli S.B., Pola G., 2014, Il Nord e la Macroregione alpina. Milano. Guerini e associati (Éupolis Lombardia).
  68. Piattoni S., 2005, «La ‘Governance’ multilivello: sfide analitiche, empiriche, normative ». Rivista italiana di scienza politica, 3: 417-445., 10.1426/20904DOI: 10.1426/20904
  69. Piattoni S., 2009, «Multi-level Governance: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis». Journal of European Integration, 31, 2: 163-180., 10.1080/07036330802642755DOI: 10.1080/07036330802642755
  70. Gänzle S., Wulf J.-J., 2014, The Emerging Core of the eu’s Macro-regional Governance Architecture: Mapping the Roles, Tasks and Self-Perceptions of Priority Area Coordinators and Horizontal Action Leaders in the eu Strategies for the Baltic Sea and the Danube Regions. Agder: University of Agder (Briefing Note).
  71. Piattoni S., 2010, The Theory of Multi-level Governance. Conceptual, Empirical and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  72. Governa F., Rivolin U.J., Santangelo M., 2009, a cura di, La costruzione del territorio europeo. Sviluppo, coesione, governance. Roma: Carocci.
  73. Greco M.A, Marchesi C., 2012, «La partecipazione ai Gect in Italia: profili giuridici e aspetti pratici». Informator, 19, 3: 60-75.
  74. Pucher J., 2012, European Territorial Cooperation – Preparation and Management of Project and Programmes (with a View to the Role of egtcs and Macro-regional Strategies). Wien: Metis (Working paper series).
  75. Samecki P., 2009, Orientation Paper on Future of Cohesion Policy. Brussels: dg Regio.
  76. Gualini E., 2003, «Challenges to Multi-level Governance: Contradictions and Conflicts in the Europeanization of Italian Regional Policy» Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 4: 616-636., 10.1080/1350176032000101280DOI: 10.1080/1350176032000101280
  77. Scharpf F.W., 2002, «Verso una teoria della multi-level governance in Europa». Rivista italiana di politiche pubbliche, 1: 11-42.
  78. Schmitt P., Dubois A., 2008, Exploring the Baltic Sea Region – On Territorial Capital and Spatial Integration. Stockholm: Nordregio report Schmitter P., 2004, «Neo-functionalism». In: Wiener A. et al. (eds.), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 45-74.
  79. Hooghe L., 1996, ed., Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multilevel Governance. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  80. Hooghe L., Marks G., 2001, Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  81. Schober A., Ionescu S., 2011, The eu Strategy for the Baltic Sea – One Year on. Brussels: European Union (Parliamentary Research Service-Library Keysources).
  82. Hooghe L., Marks G., 2003, «Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance». American political science review, 97, 2: 233-243.
  83. Schymik C., 2011, Blueprint for a Macro-Region. eu Strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions. Berlin: swp Research paper.
  84. Skelcher C., 2005, «Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism, and the Desing of Democratic Governance». Governance, 18, 1: 89-110., 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00267.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00267.x
  85. Stephenson P., 2013, «Twenty Years of Multi-level Governance: ‘Where Does it come From? What is it? Where is it Going?». Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 6: 817-837., 10.1080/13501763.2013.781818DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.781818
  86. Stocchiero A., 2010, Macro-regioni Europee: del vino vecchio in una botte nuova? Background paper. Roma: cespi (Working papers 65/2010).
  87. Sutcliffe J.B., 2000, «The 1999 Reform of the Structural Fund Regulations: Multilevel Governance or Renationalization?». Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 2: 290-309., 10.1080/135017600343205DOI: 10.1080/135017600343205
  88. Ziller J., 2013, Diritto delle politiche e delle istituzioni dell’Unione Europea. Bologna: il Mulino.

Davide Gianluca Bianchi, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2016, pp. 5-27, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2016-001001

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche