Click here to download

Equal Treatment in Land Use Planning: Investigating the Ethics of the Transfer of Development Rights
Journal Title: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Author/s: Francesco Chiodelli 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  8 Pg. 121-138 FullText PDF:  97 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2016-001007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 



  1. Camagni R., 2014, ≪Perequazione urbanistica ‘estesa’, rendita e finanziarizzazione immobiliare: un conflitto con l’equita e la qualita territoriale≫. Scienze Regionali, 13, 2: 29-44., 10.3280/SCRE2014-002003DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-002003
  2. Campbell H., Marshall R., 1999, ≪Ethical Frameworks and Planning Theory≫. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 3: 464-478., 10.1111/1468-2427.00208DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00208
  3. Chiodelli F., 2012, ≪Re-politicizing Space through Technical Rules≫. Planning Theory, 11, 2: 115-127., 10.1177/1473095211420839DOI: 10.1177/1473095211420839
  4. Chiodelli F., 2014, ≪Verso un’agenda per citta multiculturali: la regolazione spaziale della diversita religiosa in Italia≫. In: Calafati A. (a cura di), Città tra sviluppo e declino. Un’agenda urbana per l’Italia. Roma: Donzelli, 339-354.
  5. Chiodelli F., 2015, ≪Religion and the City: A Review on Muslim Spatiality in Italian Cities≫. Cities, 44: 19-28., 10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.004DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.004
  6. Chiodelli F., Moroni S., 2015, ≪Corruption in Land-use Issues: A Crucial Challenge for Planning Theory and Practice≫. Town Planning Review, 86, 4., 10.3828/tpr.2015.27DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2015.27
  7. Chiodelli F., Scavuzzo L., 2014, ≪Power in Space: Space Regulation Amidst Techniques and Politics in the Global South≫. In: Chiodelli F., De Carli B.,
  8. Falletti M., Scavuzzo L. (eds.), Cities to Be Tamed? Spatial Investigations Across the Urban South. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 150-172.
  9. Cullingworth J.B., 1993, The Political Culture of Planning. London and New York: Routledge.
  10. De Carli M., 2012, a cura di, La libera circolazione dei diritti edificatori a Milano e altrove, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. Ellickson R.C., 1973, ≪Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls≫. The University of Chicago Law Review, 40, 4: 681-781.
  12. Galuzzi P., 2014, ≪La perequazione urbanistica. Milano, criticita e rimedi nel caso del pgt 2012≫. Scienze Regionali, 13, 2: 113-124., 10.3280/SCRE2014-002009DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-002009
  13. Gibelli M.C., 2014, ≪La perequazione urbanistica ‘estesa’: una anomalia nel panorama internazionale≫. Scienze Regionali, 13, 2: 45-58., 10.3280/SCRE2014-002004DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-002004
  14. Goggi G., 2014, ≪Il pgt di Milano, perequazione, diritti edificatori e diritti dei cittadini≫. Scienze Regionali, 13, 2: 87-100., 10.3280/SCRE2014-002007DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-002007
  15. Gometz G., 2008, Le regole tecniche. Una guida refutabile, Pisa: Edizioni Ets. Harper T.L., Stein S.M., 1995, ≪A Classical Liberal (Libertarian) Approach to Planning Theory≫. In: Hendler S. (ed.), Planning Ethics. A Reader in Planning Theory, Practice, and Education. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, 11-29.
  16. Mazza L., 1995, ≪Technical Knowledge, Practical Reason and the Planner’s Responsibility≫. Town Planning Review, 66, 4: 389-409., 10.1177/147309520200100102DOI: 10.1177/147309520200100102
  17. Mazza L., 2009, ≪Plan and Constitution – Aristotle’s Hippodamus: Toward an ‘ostensive’ Definition of Spatial Planning≫. Town Planning Review, 80, 2: 113-41., 10.3828/tpr.80.2.2.DOI: 10.3828/tpr.80.2.2.
  18. Micelli E., 2011, La gestione dei piani urbanistici. Perequazione, accordi, incentivi. Venezia: Marsilio.
  19. Micelli E., 2002, ≪Development Rights Markets to Manage Urban Plans in Italy≫. Urban Studies, 39, 1: 141-154., 10.1080/00420980220099122DOI: 10.1080/00420980220099122
  20. Moroni S., 2010, ≪Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Land-use Regulation: Towards Nomocracy≫. Planning Theory, 9, 2: 137-155., 10.1177/1473095209357868DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357868
  21. Moroni S., 2014, ≪Considerazioni critiche su diritti e indici di edificazione≫. Scienze Regionali, 13, 2: 59-72., 10.3280/SCRE2014-002005DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-002005
  22. Moroni S., 2015, ≪Complexity and the Inherent Limits of Explanation and Prediction: Urban Codes for Self-organising Cities≫. Planning Theory (online first;, 10.1177/1473095214521104)DOI: 10.1177/1473095214521104)
  23. Nelson A.C., Pruetz R., Woodruff D., Nicholas J.C., Juergensmeyer J.C., Witten J., 2012, The tdr Handbook. Designing and Implementing Transfer of Development Rights Programs. Washington: Island Press.
  24. Rawls J., 1971, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard U.P.
  25. Rawls J., 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge Harvard U.P.
  26. Renard V., 2007, ≪Property Rights and the Transfer of Development Rights. Question of Efficiency and Equity≫. Town Planning Review, 78, 1: 41-60., 10.3828/tpr.78.1.4DOI: 10.3828/tpr.78.1.4
  27. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M., 1973, ≪Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning ≫. Policy Science, 4, 2: 155-169., 10.1007/BF01405730DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
  28. Rocella A., 2014, ≪Problemi giuridici di un mercato dei diritti edificatori≫. Scienze Regionali, 13, 2: 73-86., 10.3280/SCRE2014-002006DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-002006
  29. Stein S.M., Harper T.L., 2005, ≪Rawls’s ‘Justice as Fairness’: A Moral Basis for Contemporary Planning Theory≫. Planning Theory, 4, 2: 147-172., 10.1177/1473095205054603DOI: 10.1177/1473095205054603

Francesco Chiodelli, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2016, pp. 121-138, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2016-001007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content