Clicca qui per scaricare

Innovare la didattica universitaria attraverso l’integrazione delle ICT: l’esperienza del Progetto PRODID
Titolo Rivista: EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING 
Autori/Curatori: Marina De Rossi, Mario Giampaolo, Claudio Riva, Cinzia Ferranti, Angelo Calò, Luigi Castelli, Cecilia Dal Bon 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 1  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 35-52 Dimensione file:  73 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EXI2016-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This article deals with the theme of innovation in academic didactic through the use of technologies and is one of the outputs of a larger project, "Preparazione alla professionalità docente e innovazione didattica" (PRODID), which aims to establish and develop strategies to support teaching profession at the University of Padua. The authors introduce the theoretical framework and the projects carried out in the University of Padua to take advantage of the potential of technology, then present the results obteined during the first year of the project. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire which involved professors of the University and semi-structured interviews conducted with 16 privileged witnesses forming part of the teaching staff. The questionnaire collects the level of diffusion of didactic solutions that rely on online resources and the quality of teaching experiences conducted by the teachers. The interviews relate to multiple aspects of teaching by highlighting best and innovative practices, resistances due to established practices, and teaching models adopted.


Keywords: Teachers’ professional development; didactic technologies; blen¬ded learning; university; equal opportunity; innovation.

  1. Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding. Seville: JRC-IPTS. Tratto da: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/ pub.cfm?id-5099.
  2. Alfonsi, C.R., Pedreschi, D. (2004). e-università: facciamo il punto. In Alfonsi, C.R., Carfagna, M., Pedreschi, D. (a cura di), e-università: facciamo il punto. Roma: Fondazione CRUI.
  3. Cesareni, C., Ligorio, M.B., Pontecorvo, C. (2001). Discussione e argomentazione in un forum universitario. Tecnologie didattiche, 24, 3, 55-65.
  4. Collis, B., Bianco, M., Margaryan, A., Waring, B. (2005). Putting blanded learning to work: A case study from a multinational oil company. Education, Communication, Information, 5, 233-250.
  5. Delrio, C., Dondi, C. (2008), ICT and Educational Policy in the European Region. In Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 1097-1108). New York: Springer.
  6. Frattini, R., Rossi, P. (2012). Report sulle donne nell’università italiana. Meno di zero, III, 8-9.
  7. Galliani, L. (2005). Linee di ricerca educativa sulle TIC. In Galliani, L., Costa, R. (a cura di), E-learning nella didattica universitaria: modelli, ricerche ed esperienze della Facoltà di Scienze della formazione dell’Università di Padova. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  8. Galliani, L. (2007). Le nuove forme della didattica in un’università cambiata. Atti del convegno “Università italiana università europea. La convergenza dei percorsi formativi da Bologna 1999 a Londra 2007”, Camerino, febbraio.
  9. Galliani, L., De Wall, P. (eds.) (2005). Learning Face-to-Face, in Action and on-line: Integrated Model of Lifelong Learning. Atti del convegno European Distance and e-learning Network (EDEN), Helsinki.
  10. Ginns, P., Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in Blended Learning: Exploring the Relationship between on-line and Face to Face Teaching and Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 53-64.
  11. Graham, C.R., Allen S., Ure, D. (2003). Blended Learning Environment: A Review of the Research Literature, unpublished manuscript, Provo (UT).
  12. Hughes, A. (2009). Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World. JISC Report. Tratto da: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/heweb20rptv1.pdf.
  13. ISTAT (2011). Rapporto annuale. La situazione del Paese nel 2010. Tratto da: http://www3.istat.it/dati/catalogo/20110523_00/rapporto_2011.pdf.
  14. Jarvela, S., Hakkarainen, K., Lehtinen, E., Lipponen, L. (2000). Created Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Culture in Finnish Schools: Research Perspectives on Sociocognitive Effects. International journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 10 pp. 3-12.
  15. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., Loken, E. (2010). The Effect of Twitter on College Student Engagement and Grades, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Blackwell: Publishing Ltd.
  16. Kirkwood, A., Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: What is “enhanced” and how do we know? A Critical Literature Review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 1, 6-36.
  17. Ligorio, M.B. (2006). I modelli blended. In Ligorio, M.B., Cacciamani, S., Cesareni, D. (a cura di), Blended learning. Dalla scuola dell’obbligo alla formazione adulta. Roma: Carocci.
  18. Livingstone, S. (2010). Ragazzi online. Milano: Vita&Pensiero.
  19. Manuguerra, M., Petocz, P. (2011). Promoting Student Engagement by Integrating New Technology into Tertiary Education: The Role of the iPad. Asian Social Science, 7, 11.
  20. Messina, L., Tabone, S. (2013). Technology Proficiency, TPACK and Beliefs about Technology: A Survey with Primary School Student Teachers. REM-Research on Education and Media, 5, 1, 11-29.
  21. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. (2003). Not “what” but “how”: Becoming Design-wise about Educational Technology. In Zhao, Y. (ed.), What should Teacher know about Technology? Perspectives and Practices (99-122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  22. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Fremework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054.
  23. OECD (2012). Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. Tratto da: http://www.oecd.org/edu/EAG%202012_e-book_EN_200912.pdf.
  24. Olapiriyakul, K., Scher, J.M. (2006). A Guide to Establishing Hybrid Learning Courses: Employing Information Technology to create a New Learning Experience, and a Case Study. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 287-301.
  25. Raccomandazione del parlamento europeo e del consiglio. (2006/962/CE). Tratto da: http://www.indire.it/db/docsrv/PDF/raccomandazione_europea.pdf.
  26. Spears, R., Lea, M., Postmes, T. (2001). Social Psychological Theories of Computer Mediated Communication: Social Pain or Social Gain? In Giles, H., Robinson, P. (eds.). New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 601-624). New York: Wiley.
  27. Strjbos, J.W., Kirschner, P.A., Martens, R.L. (2004). What we know about CSCL and implementing it in Higher Education, Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  28. Wilson, P. (1991). Computer Supported Cooperative Work. An Introduction. Oxford Norwell: Intellect.
  29. Winograd, T., Flores, F. (1987). Calcolatori e conoscenza. Un nuovo approccio alla progettazione delle tecnologie dell’informazione. Milano: Mondadori.



  1. Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found.

Marina De Rossi, Mario Giampaolo, Claudio Riva, Cinzia Ferranti, Angelo Calò, Luigi Castelli, Cecilia Dal Bon, in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2016, pp. 35-52, DOI:10.3280/EXI2016-001003

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche