Click here to download

Leading school-based assessment for educational improvement: Rethinking accountability
Journal Title: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Author/s: Gavin Brown 
Year:  2015 Issue: 61 Language: English 
Pages:  12 Pg. 70-81 FullText PDF:  108 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2015-061005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Increasing accountability pressure to have schools and teachers show improvements in student learning outcomes is being advocated by politicians, public policy, and parent populations. This requires school leaders to transform their leadership practices to instructional leadership practices that lead to greater learning outcomes for students. The most powerful effects on student learning are associated with leaders who (1) promote and participate in teacher learning; (2) plan, coordinate, and evaluate teaching; (3) establish goals and expectations; (4) deal with strategic resourcing, and (5) provide an orderly and supportive environment. Large learning gains have been documented when school leaders are actively involved in collecting and evaluating assessment data and in designing and monitoring pedagogical responses to the assessment results. Two important constraints have been identified: (1) assessment instruments must be formatively diagnostic rather than simply producing total or rank order scores and (2) consequences around assessment results must be structured so as to take advantage of teachers’ dominant commitment to improvement as the fundamental rationale for assessment. This paper will describe the model used in New Zealand for instructional leadership that transforms school learning outcomes through effective use of educational assessment tools and data.
Keywords: Educational Improvement; Accountability, Learning Outcomes

  1. Barnes, N., Fives, H., Dacey, C.M. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs (pp. 284-300). New York: Routledge.
  2. Brown, G.T.L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), pp. 301-318.
  3. Brown, G.T.L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  4. Brown, G.T.L. (2009). Teachers’ self-reported assessment practices and conceptions: Using structural equation modelling to examine measurement and structural models. In T. Teo & M. S.
  5. Khine (Eds.), Structural equation modeling in educational research: Concepts and applications (pp. 243-266). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
  6. Brown, G.T.L. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Comparing primary and secondary teachers in New Zealand. Assessment Matters, 3, pp. 45-70.
  7. Brown, G.T.L. (2013). asTTle—A national testing system for formative assessment: How the national testing policy ended up helping schools and teachers. In M. Lai, S. Kushner (Eds.), A National Developmental and Negotiated Approach to School and Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39-56). London: Emerald Group Publishing.
  8. Brown, G.T.L., Harris, L.R. (2009). Unintended consequences of using tests to improve learning: How improvement-oriented resources engender heightened conceptions of assessment as school accountability. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(12), pp. 68-91.
  9. Brown, G.T.L., Hattie, J. A. (2012). The benefits of regular standardized assessment in childhood education: Guiding improved instruction and learning. In S. Suggate & E. Reese (Eds.) Contemporary educational debates in childhood education and development (pp. 287-292). London: Routledge.
  10. Brown, G.T.L., Chaudhry, H., Dhamija, R. (2015). The impact of an assessment policy upon teachers’ self-reported assessment beliefs and practices: A quasi-experimental study of Indian teachers in private schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, pp. 50-64.
  11. Brown, G.T.L., Hui, S.K.F., Yu, W.M., Kennedy, K.J. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: A tripartite model of accountability, improvement, and irrelevance.
  12. International Journal of Educational Research. Brown, G.T.L., Kennedy, K.J., Fok, P.K., Chan, J.K.S., Yu, W.M. (2009). Assessment for improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), pp. 347-363.
  13. Brown, G.T L., Lake, R., Matters, G. (2011). Queensland teachers’ conceptions of assessment: The impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), pp. 210-220.
  14. Brown, G.T.L., Michaelides, M. (2011). Ecological rationality in teachers’ conceptions of assessment across samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(3), pp. 319-337.
  15. Cannell, J.J. (1989). How public educators cheat on standardized achievement tests. Albuquerque, NM: Friends for Education.
  16. Fives, H., Buehl, M.M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors (Vol. 2, pp. 471-499). Washington, DC: APA.
  17. Gebril, A., Brown, G.T.L. (2014). The effect of high-stakes examination systems on teacher beliefs: Egyptian Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(1), pp. 16-33.
  18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of meta-analyses in education. London: Routledge.
  19. Hattie, J.A.C., Brown, G.T.L. (2008). Technology for school-based assessment and assessment for learning: Development principles from New Zealand. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(2), pp. 189-201.
  20. Hattie, J.A., Brown, G.T.L. (2010). Assessment and evaluation. In C. Rubie-Davies (Ed.) Educational psychology: Concepts, research and challenges (pp. 102-117). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  21. Hattie, J.A.C., Brown, G.T.L., Keegan, P.J. (2003). A national teacher-managed, curriculum-based assessment system: Assessment Tools for Teaching & Learning (asTTle). International Journal of Learning, 10, pp. 771-778.
  22. Hattie, J.A.C., Brown, G.T.L., Keegan, P.J., MacKay, A.J., Irving, S.E., et al. (2004, December). Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning (asTTle) Manual (Version 4, 2005). Wellington, NZ: University of Auckland/ Ministry of Education/ Learning Media.
  23. Lai, M.K., McNaughton, S., Amituanai-Toloa, M., Turner, R., Hsiao, S. (2009 ). Sustained acceleration of achievement in reading comprehension: The New Zealand experience. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), pp. 30–56.
  24. Lai, M.K., McNaughton, S., Timperley, H., Hsiao, S. (2009). Sustaining continued acceleration in reading comprehension achievement following an intervention. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), pp. 81-100.
  25. Lerner, J.S., Tetlock, P.E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), pp. 255-275.
  26. Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), pp. 4-16.
  27. McNaughton, S., Lai, M.K. (2009). A model of school change for culturally and linguistically diverse students in New Zealand: a summary and evidence from systematic replication. Teaching Education, 20(1), pp. 55-75.
  28. McNaughton, S., Lai, M.K., Hsiao, S. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: A replication series across clusters of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), pp. 203-228.
  29. Parr, J.M., Timperley, H. (2008). Teachers, schools and using evidence: Considerations of preparedness. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), pp. 57-71. Parr, J.M., Timperley, H., Reddish, P., Jesson, R., Adams, R. (2007). Literacy Professional Development Project: Identifying Effective Teaching and Professional Development Practices for Enhanced Student Learning. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education, Research Division.
  30. Robinson, V.M.J. (2007, October). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why (William Walker Oration). Paper presented at the National Conference of the Australian Council for Educational Leaders, Melbourne, Aus.
  31. Robinson, V., Lai, M.K. (2006). Practitioner Research for Educators: A Guide to Improving Classrooms and Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  32. Si’ilata, R., Dreaver, K., Parr, J., Timperley, H., Meissel, K. (2011). Tula’i Mai! Making a Difference to Pasifika Student Achievement in Literacy Literacy Professional Development Project 2009 - 2010. Auckland, NZ: Auckland UniServices Ltd.
  33. Timperley, H.S. (2005). Instructional Leadership Challenges: The Case of Using Student Achievement Information for Instructional Improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(1), pp. 3-22.
  34. Timperley, H. (2011a). Knowledge and the leadership of learning. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(2), pp. 145-170.
  35. Timperley, H. (2011b). Leading teachers’ professional learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 118-130). London: Sage.
  36. Timperley, H. (2011c). Using student assessment for professional learning: Focusing on students’ outcomes to identify teachers’ needs (Paper No. 21). Melbourne, Aus: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Education Policy and Research Division, Office for Policy, Research and Innovation
  37. Timperley, H.S., Phillips, G. (2003). Changing and sustaining teachers’ expectations through professional development in literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 627-641.

Gavin Brown, in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 61/2015, pp. 70-81, DOI:10.3280/RIV2015-061005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content