Click here to download

Mediatization and Network Society: A Research Agenda
Author/s: Giovanni Boccia Artieri 
Year:  2015 Issue: 50 Language: Italian 
Pages:  8 Pg. 60-67 FullText PDF:  205 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SC2015-050006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The contribution analyses the social change from the point of view of the mediatization approach. The concept of mediatization has to be distinguished from that of mediation, because it identifies a meta-process of cultural and social transformation such as urbanization, globalization and individualization. This meta-process is influenced -but not determined - by media and it refers to the ability of media to spread their format or to impose specific frame in the lifeworld. On this basis, the article identifies three strands of the debate about mediatization - institutionalist, social constructivist, material - and then identifies the systemic approach as an important corrective to the limits of the three approaches. The systemic approach, using the themes of "synchronization" and "irritation" among the social systems and the "media logics" shows how the mediatization is a complex process that must also include non-media factors and agency of subjects. In summary, the mediatization is a meta-process that can not be reduced to specific techno-communicative devices and therefore has a more abstract generalized valence. But at the same time the mediatization does not incorporate an (average) unitary logic and therefore can only be observed through the specificity of the media practices. Ultimately the mediatization is not proposed as a new paradigm or as a middle-range theory. Rather it is a guiding concept for the empirical exploration of the social transformations that takes into account how it is today intensified media’s saturation of social interaction.
Keywords: Mediatization, media studies, media practice, performance.

  1. David A.L., Snow R.P. (1979), Media logic, Sage, Beverly Hills.
  2. Boccia Artieri G. (2004), I media-mondo. Forme e linguaggi dell’esperienza contemporanea, Meltemi, Roma.
  3. Boccia Artieri G. (2012), Stati di connessione. Pubblici, cittadini e consumatori nella (Social) Network Society, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  4. boyd d. (2011), Social Network Sities as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications, in Z. Papacharissi (ed.), A Network Self, Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Routledge, London.
  5. Butler J. (1993), Bodies That Matter, Routledge, New York; trad. it. (1996), Corpi che contano, Feltrinelli, Milano.
  6. Couldry N., Hepp A. (2013), Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments, in «Communication Theory», 23(3), pp. 191-202.
  7. Deacon D., Stanyer J. (2014), Mediatization: key concept or conceptual bandwagon, in «Media, Culture & Society», 36(7), pp. 1032-1044.
  8. Deacon D., Stanyer J. (2015), “Mediatization and” or “Mediatization of”? A response to Hepp et al., in «Media, Culture & Society», 37(3), pp. 655-657.
  9. Hepp A. (2013), The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatizationresearch in times of the “mediation of everything”, in «European Journal of Communication», n. 28, pp. 615-629.
  10. Gemini L. (2008), In viaggio. Immaginario, comunicazione e pratiche del turismo contemporaneo, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  11. Hepp A., Hjarvard S., Lundby K. (2015), Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay Between Media, Culture, and Society, in «Media, Culture & Society», 37(2), pp. 314-324.
  12. Hjarvard S. (2011), The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change, in «Culture and Religion», vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 119-135.
  13. Jurgenson N. (2011), Digital-dualism verses augmented-reality, in http://thesocietypages. org/cyborgology/2011/02/24/digital-dualism-versus-augmented-reality/
  14. Krotz F. (2009), Mediatization: A Concept With Which to Grasp Media and Societal Change, in K. Lundby (ed.), Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, Peter Lang, New York, pp. 21-40.
  15. Livingstone S. (2009), On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008, in «Journal of Communication», 59 (1), pp. 1-18.
  16. Livingstone S., Lunt P. (2014), Mediatization: an emerging paradigm for media and communication research, in K. Lundby (ed.), Mediatization of Communication: Handbooks of Communication Science vol. 21, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp. 703-723.
  17. Luhmann N. (1996), Die Realität der massenmedien, Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH,
  18. Opladen; trad. it. (2000), La realtà dei mass media, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  19. Lundby K. (ed.) (2014), Mediatization of Communication. Handbooks of Communication Science vol. 21, De Gruyter Mounton, Berlin/Boston.
  20. Lunt P., Livingstone S. (2015), Is “mediatization” the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015), in «Media, Culture and Society».
  21. Mazzoli L. (a cura di) (2009), Network Effect. Quando la rete diventa pop, Codice Edizioni, Torino.
  22. Morozov E. (2014), Silicon Valley is turning our lives into an asset class, in «Financial Time», html#axzz3yx8etpWA.
  23. Stutzman F., Gross R., Acquisti, A. (2012), Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook, in «Journal of Privacy and Confdentiality», vol. 4, n. 7, p. 41.

Giovanni Boccia Artieri, Mediatization and Network Society: A Research Agenda in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 50/2015, pp. 60-67, DOI:10.3280/SC2015-050006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content