Click here to download

The construction of indicators in the evaluation of a policy to combat early school leaving: the application of evaluating brainstorming
Journal Title: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Author/s: Maddalena Bartolini 
Year:  2015 Issue: 63 Language: Italian 
Pages:  20 Pg. 83-102 FullText PDF:  447 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2015-063006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

In order to understand the biographies of those who are at risk of dropout, the aim of this paper is to elicit from the young people questions, perceptions and mechanisms as to better understand them and, consequently, whether the existing decisions, actions and policies are suitable for them. I will try, by means of the technique of evaluating brainstorming, to co-build the indicators of the project with the objective of problematizing concepts emerged from the young, in particular from group debates on school leaving. The methodological reference of this technique is Bezzi (2013), who conceives evaluating brainstorming as the evolution of the classic brainstorming. He has developed this technique with the purpose of including the ability to explore semantically a concept and produce, for social research, indicators through an inductive method. As part of the evaluation research, this type of brainstorming allows to explore the Program Theory and analyze and evaluate social programs. It is a consensual and group technique with the purpose of reaching, through a collective synthesis, a set of shared indicators.
Keywords: Early School Leavers, Realist Evaluation; The Youth Plan; Liguria Region; Evaluating Brainstorming; Young

  1. Bezzi C., Cannavò L., Palumbo M. (2010). Costruire e usare indicatori nella ricerca sociale e nella valutazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Coleman J.S. (1986). “Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5, 2, pp. 117-127.
  3. Colombo M. (2010). Dispersione scolastica e politiche per il successo formativo. Dalla ricerca sugli early school leavers alle proposte di innovazione. Trento: Erikson.
  4. Fasanella A., Stame N. a cura di (2002). Realismo e Valutazione. In Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Anno XXIII, n.68-69. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Furlong A., Cartmel F., Biggart A., Sweeting H. & West, P. (2003). Youth Transitions: Patterns of Vulnerability and Processes of Social Inclusion. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  6. Glennan S. (2008). “Mechanisms”, in Psillos S., Curd M. (a cura di). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London: Routledge, pp. 376-384.
  7. Palumbo M. (2012). Il processo di valutazione. Decidere, programmare, valutare. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Pawson R., Tilley N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage
  9. Ruzzene A. (2012). Meccanismi sociali nelle scienze sociali. In Aphex: Portale italiano di filosofia analitica:

Maddalena Bartolini, The construction of indicators in the evaluation of a policy to combat early school leaving: the application of evaluating brainstorming in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 63/2015, pp. 83-102, DOI:10.3280/RIV2015-063006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content