Click here to download

Reflexivity at play: the role of neuroscience in enactive learning
Journal Title: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Author/s: Francesca Morganti 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  10 Pg. 433-442 FullText PDF:  185 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2016-003012
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Within the wide landscape defined over the past decades by social neuroscience, the action seems to be the key concept for knowledge acquisition. Consistently, the most recent interpretations of body mimicry as a vehicle for the sharing of experiences within a dyad in interaction appears to constitute a valid reflection on the role that mirror neurons, and the intersubjectivity supported by them, may have for the cognitive development and reflexivity in learning. Within this enactive perspective, that contemplates the central role of action and the experience derived therefrom, the knowledge acquisition, the learning and the Self-development become possible through an embodied experience and requires a meaningful grounding in the intersubjective interactions. The present contribution aims in outlining the main points on which and enactive perspective to learning is grounded, highlighting the role played by the latest neuroscientific findings to support this approach.
Keywords: Enactivity, embodiement, intersubjectivity, learning, social neurosciences

  1. Bateson, G. (1972) Steps on Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press. [Trad.it (1977) Verso un’Ecologia della Mente. Milano: Adelphi].
  2. Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
  3. [Trad.it (1967) Verso una teoria dell’istruzione. Roma: Armando Editore].
  4. Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York: Norton.
  5. [Trad.it (1987) Il linguaggio del bambino. Roma: Armando Editore].
  6. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2008). Making sense in participation. An enactive approach to social cognition. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, & G. Riva (Eds.), Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective to the Study of Interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press. [Trad. it (2010) Intersoggettivita e Interazione: Un dialogo tra scienze cognitive scienze sociali e neuroscienze. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri].
  7. Galbusera, L., & Fuchs, T. (2013). Embodied Understanding: Discovering the Body from Cognitive Science to Psychotherapy. In-Mind Italia, V, 1-6.
  8. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21.
  9. Gilbert, M. (1992). On Social Facts. Princeton University Press. [Trad.It 2015 Il noi collettivo. Impegno congiunto e mondo sociale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore].
  10. Iacoboni, M. (2008). Mirroring People: The new science of how we connect with others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Trad.it (2008), Neuroni specchio. Come capiamo cio che fanno gli altri. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri].
  11. Jeannerod, M., & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, simulation and self‐identification. Mind and Language, 19, 113-146., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00251.x
  12. Lavelli, M. (2007). Intersoggettivita. Origini e primi sviluppi. Milano: Raffaello
  13. Cortina Editore. Morganti, F. (2008). What Intersubjectivity Affords: Paving the Way for a Dialogue between Cognitive Science, Social Cognition and Neuroscience. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, G. Riva (Eds), Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective to the Study of Interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  14. Morganti, F., Carassa, A., & Riva, G. (2008) Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective to the Study of Interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press. [Trad. it (2010) Intersoggettivita e Interazione: Un dialogo tra scienze cognitive scienze sociali e neuroscienze. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri].
  15. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review Neurosciences, 27, 169-192., DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  16. Siegel, D.J. (2001). Toward an interpersonal neurobiology of the developing mind: Attachment relationships, “mindsight,” and neural integration. Infant Mental Health Journal, 222, 67-94., DOI: 10.1002/1097-0355(200101/04)22:1<67::AID-IMHJ3>3.0.CO;2-G
  17. Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 407-427., DOI: 10.1007/s11097-005-9003-x
  18. Tomasello, T., Kruger, A.C., & Ratner, H.H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,16, 495-511., DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0003123X
  19. Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy: A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (ed.), Before Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  20. Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48, 703-712., DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034
  21. Varela, F.J. (1997). Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34, 72-87., DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0907
  22. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  23. Vygotskij, L.S. (1934). Pensiero e linguaggio. Ricerche psicologiche. Roma: Laterza, (Trad it 1990).
  24. Weber, A., Varela, F.J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97-125., DOI: 10.1023/A:1020368120174

Francesca Morganti, Reflexivity at play: the role of neuroscience in enactive learning in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 3/2016, pp. 433-442, DOI:10.3280/RIP2016-003012

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content