Click here to download

England’s Turn to Localism and Planning at a ‘Neighbourhood Scale’
Journal Title: TERRITORIO 
Author/s: Nick Gallent 
Year:  2016 Issue: 78 Language: Italian 
Pages:  11 Pg. 148-158 FullText PDF:  437 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2016-078018
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


L’articolo esamina la ‘localizzazione’ delle responsabilità della pianificazione territoriale in Inghilterra e l’evoluzione di un nuovo livello di pianificazione a scala di ‘comunità’, la cosiddetta ‘pianificazione di vicinato’ (Neigbourhood Planning-NP), mostrando che il percorso del ‘localismo’ in cui si colloca il NP si è evoluto da una serie di riforme del governo locale promulgate durante gli anni del governo laburista (1997-2010) e che il NP stesso è, per molti versi, una logica estensione di esperienze locali in tema di valutazione e pianificazione delle comunità per lo più nelle aree rurali. L’articolo ripercorre lo sviluppo della pianificazione di vicinato nella sua forma e stato attuale all’interno del quadro normativo più ampio, prima di esaminare brevemente il suo potenziale nel fornire interventi su misura e risolvere i conflitti nella pianificazione locale
Keywords: Pianificazione; vicinato; Inghilterra

  1. Baumann G., 1996, Contesting Culture: Discourses of Identity in Multi-Ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. Beck U., 1994, «The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization». In: Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. (eds.), A Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 56-110.
  2. Cabinet Office, 2010b, The Big Society Programme. www.cabinetoffice. gov.uk/ sites/default/files/resources/building-big-society.pdf.
  3. Cameron D., 2009, Speech: The Big Society. www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/11/David_Cameron_The_Big_Society.aspx.
  4. Conservative Party, 2008, A Stronger Society: Voluntary Action in the 21st Century. London: Conservative Party.
  5. Conservative Party, 2009, Control Shift: Returning Power to Local Communities. London: Conservative Party.
  6. Cook B., 2013, «How we Did it – Allocating Sites through a Neighbourhood Plan». Planning Resource, June 14, 2014.
  7. Corry D., Stoker G., 2002, New Localism: Refashioning the Centre-Local Relationship. London: nlgn.
  8. Countryside Agency, 2004, What Makes a Good Parish Plan? Cheltenham: Countryside Agency.
  9. Dennis N., 1972, Public Participation and Planners’ Blight. London: Faber and Faber.
  10. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2010, Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential. London: dbis.
  11. detr-Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, maff-Ministry for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, 2000, Our Countryside: The Future: A Fair Deal for Rural England. London: detr and maff.
  12. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, 1998, Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People. London: hmso.
  13. Driver S., Martell L., 1997, «New Labour’s Communitarianisms». Critical Social Policy, 17, 52: 27-46., 10.1177/026101839701705202DOI: 10.1177/026101839701705202
  14. Ellis H., 2011, «Questions of Far-reaching Reform». Town and Country Planning, 80, 1: 15-20.
  15. Etzioni A., 1993, The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.
  16. Foucault M., 1982, «The Subject and Power». Critical Inquiry, 8, 4: 777-795.
  17. Friedmann J., 1973, Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. New York: Anchor Press.
  18. Friedmann J., 1993, «Towards a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning». Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 4: 482-485., 10.1080/01944369308975902DOI: 10.1080/01944369308975902
  19. Gallent N., Bell N., 2000, «Planning Exceptions in Rural England: Past, Present and Future». Planning Practice and Research, 15, 4: 375-384., 10.1080/713691905DOI: 10.1080/713691905
  20. Gallent N., Ciaffi D., 2014, eds., Community Action and Planning: Contexts, Drivers and Outcomes. Bristol: Policy Press.
  21. Gallent N., Robinson S., 2012, Neighbourhood Planning: Communities, Networks and Governance. Bristol: Policy Press.
  22. Gallent N., Robinson S., 2012b, «Community Perspectives on Localness and Priority Housing Policies in Rural England». Housing Studies, 27, 3: 360-380., 10.1080/02673037.2012.651107DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2012.651107
  23. Gallent N., Hamiduddin I., Madeddu M., 2013, «Localism, Down-scaling, and the Strategic Dilemmas Confronting Planning in England». Town Planning Review, 84, 5: 563-582., 10.3828/tpr.2013.30DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2013.30
  24. Gallent N., 2013, «Re-connecting ‘People and Planning’: Parish Plans and the English Localism Agenda». Town Planning Review, 84, 3: 371-396., 10.3828/tpr.2013.20DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2013.20
  25. Gallent N., Hamiduddin I., Juntti M., Kidd S., Shaw D., 2015, Introduction to Rural Planning: Economies, Communities and Landscapes. London: Routledge.
  26. Gurran N., Gallent N., Chin R.L.H., 2016, Politics, Planning and Housing Supply in Australia, England and Hong Kong. London: Routledge.
  27. Healey P., 1997, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  28. Innes J., Booher D., 2010, Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
  29. Jessop B., 2002, «Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective». Antipode, 34, 3: 452-472., 10.1111/1467-8330.00250DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00250
  30. Lowndes V., 2001, «Rescuing Aunt Sally: Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics». Urban Studies, 38, 11: 1953-1971., 10.1080/00420980120080871DOI: 10.1080/00420980120080871
  31. Marsh D., Rhodes R., 1992, «Policy Networks in British Government: A Critique of Existing Approaches». In: Marsh D., Rhodes R. (eds.), Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1-26.
  32. Misztal B.A., 1996, Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  33. Owen S., 2002, «Locality and Community: Towards a Vehicle for Community-based Decision-making in Rural Localities in England». Town Planning Review, 73, 1: 41-61., 10.3828/tpr.73.1.3DOI: 10.3828/tpr.73.1.3
  34. Owen S., Moseley M., 2003, «Putting Parish Plans in their Place: Relationships between Community Based Initiatives and Development Planning in English Villages». Town Planning Review, 74, 4: 445-471., 10.3828/tpr.74.4.5DOI: 10.3828/tpr.74.4.5
  35. Parker G., 2014, «Engaging Neighbourhoods: Experiences of Transactive Planning with Communities in England». In: Gallent N., Ciaffi D. (eds.), Community Action and Planning. Bristol: Policy Press, 177-200.
  36. Planning Resource, 2015, Neighbourhood Planning Data. www.planningresource.co.uk/neighbourhood-planning.
  37. Pollitt C., 1990, Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
  38. Rhodes R.A.W., 1997, «Governing without Government: Order and Change in British Politics». In: Id. (ed.), Understanding Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open U.P., 3-25.
  39. Rittel H., 1972, «On the Planning Crisis: Systems Analysis of the ‘First and Second Generations’». Bedriftsøkonomen, 8: 390-396. courses. cs.vt.edu/cs4634/reading/Rittel.pdf.
  40. Rittel H., Webber M., 1973, «Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning ». Policy Sciences, 4, 2: 155-169., 10.1007/BF01405730DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
  41. Rydin Y., 2014, «Communities, Networks and Social Capital». In Gallent, Ciaffi, op.cit., 21-39.
  42. Sage D., 2012, «A Challenge to Liberalism? The Communitarianism of the Big Society and Blue Labour». Critical Social Policy, 32, 3: 365-382., 10.1177/0261018312444411DOI: 10.1177/0261018312444411
  43. Scharpf F., 1999, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  44. Schrecker C., 2006, La Communauté: histoire critique d’un concept dans la sociologie Anglo-Saxonne. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  45. Sørensen E., Torfing J., 2007, «Theoretical Approaches to Democratic Network Governance». In: Id., (eds.), Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 233-246.
  46. Stoker G., 2002, «Life is a Lottery: New Labour’s Strategy for the Reform of Devolved Governance». Public Administration, 80, 3, 417-434., 10.1111/1467-9299.00311DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00311
  47. Stoker G., 2004, Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  48. Stoker G., 2007, New Localism, Participation and Networked Community Governance. Machester: University of Manchester/Institute for Political and Economic Governance.
  49. Sturzaker J., 2011, «Can Community Empowerment Reduce Opposition to Housing? Evidence from Rural England». Planning Practice and Research, 26, 5: 555-570., 10.1080/02697459.2011.626722DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2011.626722
  50. Thatcher M., 1987, «Interview». In Woman’s Own. October 31st.
  51. Upper Eden Community Interest Company, 2012, Upper Eden ndp. Upper Eden: uecic.
  52. Weber M., 1956, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - Grundriß der Verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.
  53. Williamson O.E., 1995, «Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory». In: Id. (ed.), Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 207-256.

Nick Gallent, in "TERRITORIO" 78/2016, pp. 148-158, DOI:10.3280/TR2016-078018

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content