Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
L’uso di software open source nel processo di pianificazione partecipata
Titolo Rivista: TERRITORIO 
Autori/Curatori: Enzo Falco 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 78 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  7 P. 159-165 Dimensione file:  370 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2016-078019
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Partendo dalla condivisione della necessità d’includere i cittadini all’interno dei processi di formazione delle scelte pubbliche, il saggio cerca di presentare l’uso di alcuni software open source per facilitarne l’inclusione. Dopo una discussione teorica dell’e-planning ed e-participation, sono presentati software di collaborative mapping e Public Participation gis, blogs e social media, sistemi di supporto alle decisioni e analisi e simulazione spaziale che rispondono alla necessità di essere integrati in un processo di piano strutturato nelle seguenti fasi: percezione del problema e della necessità di un’azione; formulazione e discussione delle alternative; scelta


Keywords: Partecipazione pubblica; community planning; e-planning

  1. Aggett G., McColl C., 2006, «Evaluating Decision Support Systems for ppgis Applications». Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 33, 1: 77-92., 10.1559/152304006777323163DOI: 10.1559/152304006777323163
  2. Aitken M., 2014, «e-Planning and Public Participation: Addressing or Aggravating the Challenges of Public Participation in Planning?». International Journal of e-Planning Research (ijepr), 3, 2: 38-53., 10.4018/ijepr.2014040103DOI: 10.4018/ijepr.2014040103
  3. Al-Kodmany K., 2001, «Supporting Image Ability on the World Wide Web: Lynch’s Five Elements of the City in Community Planning». Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 6: 805-832., 10.1068/b2746tDOI: 10.1068/b2746t
  4. Andrew M., Laurent S., 2004, Understanding Open Source and Free Software Licensing. Newton, MA.: O’Reilly Media Inc.
  5. Arnstein S., 1969, «A Ladder of Citizen Participation». Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 4: 216-224., 10.1080/01944366908977225DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  6. Bobbio L., 2010, «Prove di democrazia deliberativa». Parole chiave, 43: 185-203.
  7. Boonstra B., Boelens L., 2011, Self-organisation in Urban Development: Towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning». Urban Research &Practice, 4, 2: 99-122., 10.1080/17535069.2011.579767.BrownG.,KyttaM.,2014,«KeyIssuesandResearchPrioritiesforPublicParticipationgisppgis:ASynthesisBasedonEmpiricalResearch».AppliedGeography,46:122-136.Doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2011.579767.BrownG.,KyttaM.,2014,«KeyIssuesandResearchPrioritiesforPublicParticipationgisppgis:ASynthesisBasedonEmpiricalResearch».AppliedGeography,46:122-136.Doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
  8. Bugs G., Granell C., Fonts O., Huerta J., Painho M., 2010, «An Assessment of Public Participation gis and Web 2.0 Technologies in Urban Planning Practice in Canela, Brazil». Cities, 27, 3: 172-181., 10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008
  9. Casey C., Li J., 2012, «Web 2.0 Technologies and Authentic Public Participation: Engaging Citizens in Decision Making Processes». In: Kloby
  10. K., D’Agostino M.J. (eds.), Citizens 2.0: Public and Governmental Interaction through Web 2.0 Technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science References.
  11. Davidoff P., 1965, «Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning». Journal of the American Planning Association, 31, 4: 331-338.
  12. Elwood S.A., 2002, «gis Use in Community Planning: A Multidimensional Analysis of Empowerment». Environment and Planning A, 34, 5: 905-922., 10.1068/a34117DOI: 10.1068/a34117
  13. Eräranta S., Kahila-Tani M., Nummi-Sund P., 2015, «Web-based Public Participation in Urban Planning Competitions». International Journal of e-Planning Research (ijepr), 4, 1: 1-18., 10.4018/ijepr.2015010101DOI: 10.4018/ijepr.2015010101
  14. Evans-Cowley J., Hollander J., 2010, «The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-based Participation Tools». Planning Practice & Research, 25, 3: 397-408., 10.1080/02697459.2010.503432DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2010.503432
  15. Forester J., 1999, The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA.: mit Press.
  16. Forester J., 2009, Dealing with Differences. Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  17. Friend J.K., Jessop W.N., 1969. An Operational Research Approach to the Processes of Public Planning. London: Tavistock Publications.
  18. Gilbreath Holdar G., Zakharchenko O., 2002, eds, Citizen Participation Handbook: People’s Voice Project. Kyiv: iMedia Ltd. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTBELARUS/Resources/eng.pdf.
  19. Goodchild, M., 2007, «Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography». GeoJournal, 69, 4: 211-221.
  20. Gurstein M. 2007, What is Community Informatics (and why does it Matter)? Milano: Polimetrica.
  21. Han B.C., 2013, Digitale Rationalität und das Ende des kommunikativen Handelns. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz Verlag (trad. it., 2014, Razionalità digitale. La fine dell’agire communicativo. GoWare, Mame, E-book).
  22. Healey P., 2006, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: MacMillan (2nd ed.).
  23. Huxley M., 2000, «The Limits to Communicative Planning». Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19: 369-377., 10.1177/0739456X0001900406DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0001900406
  24. ia2p 2006, ia2p’s Public Participation Toolbox. International Association for Public Participation. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/imported/06Dec_Toolbox.pdf.
  25. Irvin A.R., Stansbury J., 2004, «Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?». Public Administration Review, 64, 1: 55-65., 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
  26. Kahila M., Kytta M., 2006, The Use of Web-based Softgis Method in the Urban Planning Practices. http://opus.tkk.fi/dokumentit/conf_ams_urban_dynamics_softGIS_2006.pdf.
  27. Kingston R., Carver S., Evans A., Turton I., 2000, «Web-based Public Participation Geographical Information Systems: An Aid to Local Environmental Decision-making». Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24: 109-125.
  28. Lindblom C.E., Cohen D.K., 1979, Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. Yale: Yale U.P.
  29. Lukensmeyer C.J., Brigham S., 2005, «Taking Democracy to Scale: Large Scale Interventions for Citizens». Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 1: 47-60., 10.1177/0021886304272656DOI: 10.1177/0021886304272656
  30. Macintosh A., 2004, Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/05/205650117a.pdf.
  31. Mehndiratta S., Peralta Quiros T., 2015, How Does this Investment Help Accessibility for this Metropolitan Area’s Poorest 40 percent? Safe, Clean, Affordable... Transport for Development. World Bank Blog. http://blogs.worldbank.org/transport/how-does-investment-help-accessibilitymetropolitan-area-s-poorest-40-percent.
  32. Norris P., 2001, Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
  33. Perrone C., 2014, «Arene deliberative per un’agenda urbana italiana». In: Calafati A. (a cura di), Città tra sviluppo e declino. Un’agenda urbana per l’Italia. Roma: Donzelli.
  34. Ricca F., Scattoni P., 2008, «Pianificazione nell’approccio della scelta Strategica». In: Felici G., Sciomachen A. (a cura di), Scienza delle decisioni in Italia: applicazioni della Ricerca Operativa ai problemi aziendali. Genova: ecig.
  35. Rinner C., Keßler C., Andrulis S., 2008, «The Use of Web 2.0 Concepts to Support Deliberation in Spatial Decision-making». Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32: 386-395., 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.08.004DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.08.004
  36. Rybaczuk K.Y., 2001, «gis as an Aid to Environmental Management and Community Participation in the Negril Watershed, Jamaica». Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25, 2: 141-165., 10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00019-3DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00019-3
  37. Saad-Sulonen J., 2014, Combining Participations: Expanding the Locus of Participatory E-Planning by Combining Participatory Approaches in the Design of Digital Technology and in Urban Planning, PhD Thesis, Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/13352/isbn9789526055435.pdf?sequence=1.
  38. Saad-Sulonen J., Horelli L., 2010, «The Value of Community Informatics to Participatory Urban Planning and Design: A Case-study in Helsinki». The Journal of Community Informatics, 6, 2. http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/579/603#_ftnref6.
  39. Savitsky K., Gilovich T., 2003, «The Illusion of Transparency and the Alleviation of Speech Anxiety». Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39: 618-625., 10.1016/S0022-10310300056-8DOI: 10.1016/S0022-10310300056-8
  40. Scattoni P., 2008, «Urbanistica e ricerca operativa. Un’esperienza di collaborazione interdisciplinare». In: Ricca F. (a cura di), Modelli matematici per il supporto alle decisioni: le basi formali della scelta strategica. Roma: Aracne.
  41. Schmidt-Thomé K., Wallin S., Laatikainen T., Kangasoja J., Kyttä M. 2014, «Exploring the Use of ppgis in Self-organizing Urban Development: The Case of softgis in Pacific Beach California». The Journal of Community Informatics, 10, 3. http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1080/1111.
  42. Shim J.P., Warkentin M., Courtney J.F., Power D.J., Sharda R., Carlsson C., 2002, «Past, Present, and Future of Decision Support Technology». Decision Support Systems, 33, 2: 111-126., 10.1016/S0167-92360100139-7DOI: 10.1016/S0167-92360100139-7
  43. Silva Nunes C., 2010, «The E-Planning Paradigm - Theory, Methods and Tools: An Overview». In: Id. (ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ict for Urban Development and Monitoring. Hershey, PA: igi Global.
  44. Slotterback C.S., 2011, «Planners’ Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes». Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38, 3: 468-485., 10.1068/b36138DOI: 10.1068/b36138
  45. Stratigea A., Papadopoulou C., Panagiotopoulou M., 2015, «Tools and Technologies for Planning the Development of Smart Cities». Journal of Urban Technology, 22, 2: 43-62., 10.1080/10630732.2015.101872DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2015.101872
  46. United Nations, 2001, Tools to Support Participatory Urban Decision Making. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements Habitat. http://mirror.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=1122&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1. van Deursen A.J., van Dijk J.A., 2014, «The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage». New Media & Society, 16: 507-526., 10.1177/1461444813487959DOI: 10.1177/1461444813487959
  47. Wellman B., Quan-Haase A., Boase J., Chen W., Hampton K., Díaz I., Miyata K., 2003, «The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism». Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, 3., 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
  48. Wenger E., White N., Smith, J.D., 2009, Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Portland: cpsquare.

Enzo Falco, in "TERRITORIO" 78/2016, pp. 159-165, DOI:10.3280/TR2016-078019

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche