La qualità della didattica universitaria: significati, dimensioni e strumenti
Titolo Rivista: EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Autori/Curatori: Debora Aquario
Anno di pubblicazione:
Dimensione file: 164 KB
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:
The aim of the paper is to present a reflection about the evaluation of quality of teaching in higher education starting from the expression "quality of teaching": it contains two complex words that need to be considered in their meanings. In international studies about quality of teaching in higher education, many frameworks have been developed by different researchers with the aim of exploring the multidimensionality of the good teaching, as well as many instruments have been developed to be filled in by students for the evaluation of teaching quality.
Keywords: Teaching in higher education; quality; students’ ratings of instruction; good teaching.
- Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (2007). The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: What we know and what we do not. In Perry, R.P. & Smart, J.C., (Eds.), The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence Based Perspective (pp. 385-445). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Amplatz, C. (2006). La valutazione istituzionale della didattica universitaria in Italia. In Semeraro R., (a cura di), Valutazione e qualità della didattica universitaria. Le prospettive nazionali e internazionali (pp. 135-162). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
- Barth, M. M. (2008). Deciphering Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Factor Analysis Approach. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 40-46.
- Benton, S. L. & Cashin, W.E. (2012). Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of Research and Literature. IDEA Paper n. 50. Manhattan (KS): IDEA Center.
- Beran, T. N. & Rokosh, J.L. (2009). Instructor’s Perspectives on the Utility of Student Ratings of Instruction. Instructional Science, 37, 171-184.
- Chalmers, D. (2007). An Agenda for Teaching and Learning in Universities. Sidney: The Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
- Chen, Y. & Hoshover, L. B. (2003). Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: An Assessment of Student Perception and Motivation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 71-87.
- Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are they Related to what Students learn? A Meta-analysis and Review of the Literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 16-30.
- Dunegan, K .J. & Hrivnak, M. W. (2003). Characteristics of Mindless Teaching Evaluations and the Moderating Effects of Image Compatibility. Journal of Management Education, 27, 280-303.
- Ginns, P., Prosser, M., & Barrie, S. (2007). Students’ Perceptions of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Perspective of Currently Enrolled Students. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 603-615.
- Goldstein, G. S. & Benassi, V. A. (2006). Students’ and Instructors’ Beliefs about Excellent Lecturers and Discussion Leaders. Research in Higher Education, 47, 685-707.
- Gursoy, D. & Umbreit, W. T. (2005). Exploring Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: What Factors are Important?. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 29, 91-109.
- Harvey, L. (2006). Understanding Quality. In Purser, L., (Ed.). EUA Bologna Handbook: Making Bologna Work, Brussels: European University Association and Berlin, Raabe. Retrieved from http://www.bologna-handbook.com/.
- Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 8-35.
- Harvey, L. & Newton, J. (2007). Transforming Quality Evaluation: Moving on. In Westerheijden, D. F., Stensaker, B., Joao Rosa, M., (Eds.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation (pp. 225-245). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Heck, J., Todd, J., & Finn, D. (2002). Is Student Performance Enhanced by Perceived Teaching Quality?. Journal of Financial Education, 28, 54-62.
- Kember, D., Jenkins, W., & Kwok, C. N. (2004). Adult Students’ Perceptions of Good Teaching as a Function of Their Conceptions of Learning – Part 2: Implications for the Evaluation of Teaching. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 81-97.
- Kember, D. & Leung, D. (2011). Disciplinary Differences in Student Ratings of Teaching Quality. Research in Higher Education, 52, 279-299.
- Langbein, L. (2008). Management by Results: Student Evaluation of Faculty Teaching and the Mis-measurement of Performance. Economics of Education Review, 27 (4), 417-428.
- Light, G. & Cox, R. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional. London: Sage.
- Marsh, H. W., Muthèn, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A .J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476.
- Minelli, E., Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2002). Il valore dell’università. La valutazione della didattica, della ricerca, dei servizi negli atenei. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
- Minelli, E., Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2005). Valutare o misurare i risultati? Il caso dell’università. Liuc Papers n. 165, Serie Economia aziendale, 22.
- Mortelmans, D. & Spooren, P. (2009). A Revalidation of the SET37-questionnaire for Student Evaluations of Teaching. Educational Studies, 35, 547-552.
- Murphy, T., MacLaren, I., & Flynn, S. (2009). Toward a Summative System for the Assessment of Teaching Quality in Higher Education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20 (2), 226-236.
- Newton, J. (2007). What is Quality?. In European University Association, (Ed.), Embedding Quality Culture in Higher Education. A Selection of Papers from the 1st European Forum for Quality Assurance. Brussels: EUA.
- Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Daniel, L.G., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). A Meta-validation Model for Assessing the Score-validity of Student Teaching Evaluations. Quality & Quantity, 43, 197-209.
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., Collins, K. M. T., Filer, J. D., Wiedmaier, C. D., & Moore, C. W. (2007). Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of a Teaching Evaluation Form using a Mixed-methods Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 113-160.
- Pirsig, R. M. (1991). Lila. An Inquiry into Morals. New York: Bantam Books. (trad.it. Adelplhi, 1992, Lila. Un’indagine sulla morale).
- Pozo-Munoz, C., Rebolloso-Pacheco, E., & Fernandez-Ramirez, B. (2000). The “Ideal Teacher”. Implications for Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 253-263.
- Rebora, G. (2013). Nessuno mi può giudicare? L’università e la valutazione. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
- Semeraro, R. (2006). La valutazione della didattica universitaria. Paradigmi scientifici, rivisitazioni metodologiche, approcci multidimensionali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
- Spencer, K. J. & Schmelkin, L .P. (2002). Student Perspectives on Teaching and Its Evaluations. Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 397-409.
- Spooren, P. (2010). On the Credibility of the Judge. A Cross-classified Multilevel Analysis on Student Evaluations of Teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 121-131.
- Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evaluation of teaching: The State of the Art. Review of Educational Research, 83 (4), 598-642.
- Sproule, R. (2002). The Underdetermination of Instructor Performance by Data from the Student Evaluation of Teaching. Economics of Education Review, 21, 287-294.
- Svinicki, M. & McKeachie, W.J. (2011). McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth, 13th ed.
- Tucker, B. M. (2013). Student Evaluation to improve the Student Learning Experience: An Australian University Case Study. Research and Evaluation, 19 (7), 615-627.
- Zabaleta, F. (2007). The Use and Misuse of Student Evaluations of Teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12 (1), 55-76.
Debora Aquario, in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 2/2016, pp. 28-42, DOI:10.3280/EXI2016-002003