Click here to download

Work of relations, but which ones? Reciprocity effects on dual precarious knowledge workers couples
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Anna Carreri 
Year:  2017 Issue: 145 Language: Italian 
Pages:  18 Pg. 94-111 FullText PDF:  133 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2017-145006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The article discusses how the side bet is discursively constructed the side bet (Becker, 1960) of precarious knowledge workers, which consists of a series of mechanisms generating both use values and workers subjectivities. In the free work regime (Beverungen et al., 2013) in fact the lines of demarcation, not only the physical and temporal ones but also those related to the sense making, between productive and reproductive spheres, vanish. Towards this direction, the article, through the analysis of the discursive practices adopted by respondents, investigates the reciprocal links, in Simmel’s terms, which inevitably are working at the couple level between the productive and reproductive practices. These practices constrain and in turn are bound by social structures, primarily that of gender. The analysis sheds light on the contradictions underlying these forms of reciprocity and, from a critical point of view, observes the implications along the analytical dimensions of dis-alienation (Fisher, 2012) and self-alienation (Costas and Fleming, 2009).
Keywords: Free work, dis-alienation, self-alienation, knowledge worker

  1. Poggio B. (2002). Who’s Afraid of Mothers? In: Kostera M., Höpfl H., a cura di, Interpreting Maternal Organisations. London: Routledge: 13-26.
  2. Armano E., Risi E. (2014). Introduzione. Traiettorie, forme e processi del lavoro emergente. Sociologia del lavoro, 133: 7-26., DOI: 10.3280/SL2014-133001
  3. Armano E., Murgia A., a cura di (2012). Mappe della precarieta, vol. II: Knowledge workers, creativita, saperi e dispositivi di soggettivazione. Bologna: Odoya.
  4. Ballarino G., Regini M. (2005). Formazione e professionalita per l’economia della conoscenza. Roma: Carocci.
  5. Ballatore M., Delrio M., Murgia A. (2014). When Passion and Precariousness Come Face to Face in Knowledge Work. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 45(2): 1-13.
  6. Becker H. (1960). Notes on the Concept of Commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1): 32-40., DOI: 10.1086/222820.
  7. Berton F., Richiardi M., Sacchi S. (2009). Flex-insecurity. Perche in Italia la flessibilita diventa precarieta. Bologna: il Mulino.
  8. Beverungen A., Otto B., Spoelstra S., Kenny K., a cura di (2013). Special Issue on “Free work”. Ephemera, Theory & Politics in Organization, 13(1): 1-9.
  9. Blumer H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory. American Sociological Review, 19(1): 3-10., DOI: 10.2307/2088165
  10. Borghi V., Chicchi F. (2009). I capricci della merce: produzione di merci come produzione di rapporti sociali. Sociologia del lavoro, 116(4): 20-30., DOI: 10.3280/SL2009-116003
  11. Cardano M. (2011). La ricerca qualitativa. Bologna: il Mulino.
  12. Carreri A. (2012). Valorizzazione. Metamorfosi di un processo: dal valore lavoro di Marx alle concettualizzazioni di oggi. Bologna: Odoya.
  13. Carreri A. (2014). Fatherhood and Precarious Work: A Supporting Relation Between Systems of Meanings. AG:About Gender, 3(6): 87-115.
  14. Carreri A. (2015). Italian Parents in Precarious Work: How Normative Beliefs Affect Social Understandings of the Work-Family Boundary. Research in the Sociology of Work, 26: 1-33.
  15. Chicchi F., Leonardi E., Lucarelli S. (2016). Logiche dello sfruttamento. Oltre la dissoluzione del rapporto salariale. Verona: Ombre Corte.
  16. Connell R. (2009). Gender. Cambridge: Policy Press.
  17. Costas J., Ekman S., Maravelias C., Spoelstra S. (2013). Roundtable: Free work. Ephemera, Theory & Politics in Organization, 13(1): 11-31.
  18. Costas J., Fleming P. (2009). Beyond dis-identification - towards a discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations. Human Relations, 62(3): 353-378., DOI: 10.1177/0018726708101041
  19. Cremin C. (2010). Never employable enough: The (im)possibility of satisfying the boss’s desire. Organization, 17(2): 131-149., DOI: 10.1177/1350508409341112
  20. Cucca R., Maestripieri L. (2014). [Architects and Consultants] Between Formal Regulation and Organised Professionalism. Scambio, a. IV, n. 7.
  21. Davies B., Harré R. (1990). Positioning: The Discursive Construction of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1): 43-63.
  22. Dotti Sani G. (2012). La divisione del lavoro domestico e delle attività di cura nelle coppie italiane: un’analisi empirica. Stato e Mercato, 94: 161-194., DOI: 10.1425/36769
  23. Duncan S., Edwards R., Reynolds T., Alldred P. (2003). Motherhood, Paid Work and Partnering: Values and Theories. Work, Employment and Society, 17(2): 309-330., DOI: 10.1177/0950017003017002005
  24. Fisher E. (2012). How Less Alienation Creates More Exploitation? Audience Labour on Social Network Sites. TripleC, 10(2): 171-183., DOI: 10.1177/0950017003017002005
  25. Fumagalli A. (2013). Lavoro male comune. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  26. Fumagalli A., Morini C. (2009). La vita messa a lavoro: verso una teoria del valore-vita. Il caso del valore-affetto. Sociologia del lavoro, 115(3): 94-116., DOI: 10.3280/SL2009-114005.
  27. Garfinkel H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
  28. Gerson K. (2009). The Unfinished Revolution. How a New Generation is Reshaping Family, Work and Gender in America. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Gherardi S., Poggio B. (2003). Donna per fortuna, uomo per destino. Il lavoro raccontato da lei e da lui. Milano: Etas.
  30. Gosetti G. (2012). Lavoro frammentato, rischio diffuso. Lavoratori e prevenzione al tempo della flessibilita. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  31. Hoffman D.M. (2010). Risky Investments: Parenting and the Production of the ‘Resilient Child’. Health, Risk and Society, 12(4): 385-394., DOI: 10.1080/13698571003789716
  32. Kushner K.E., Pitre N., Williamson D., Breitkreuz R., Rempel G. (2014).
  33. Anticipating parenthood: Men’s and women’s meanings, expectations, and idea(l)s in Canada. Marriage & Family Review, 50: 1-34., DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2013.834026
  34. Laville J.L., Marazzi C., La Rosa M., Chicchi F., a cura di (2005). Reinventare Il lavoro. Roma: Sapere 2000.
  35. Magaraggia S. (2013). Tensions Between Fatherhood and the Social Construction of Masculinity in Italy. Current Sociology, 61(1): 76-92., DOI: 10.1177/0011392112464231
  36. Morini C. (2012). La cognizione dell’impermanenza. Il lavoro a tempo indeterminato paradigma della precarietà contemporanea. Quaderni di San Precario, 3: 175-196.
  37. Pandolfini V. (2012). Work-life balance in a capability perspective: an Italian case study of ‘flexible couples’. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(1): 45-54., DOI: 10.1177/1024258911431050
  38. Potter J., Wetherell M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage. Ross A. (2014). Working for Nothing - The Latest High-Growth Sector, paper presentato alla conferenza “Free and Unpaid Work, Gratuity, Collaborativity and Precariousness”, Bologna. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://commonware.org/index.php/neetwork/501-working-for-nothing.
  39. Simmel G. (1908). Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot (trad. it. Sociologia. Milano: Comunità, 1989).
  40. Terranova T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text 63, 18(2): 33-58.
  41. Vincent C., Ball S. (2007). ‘Making Up’ the Middle-Class Child: Families, Activities and Class Dispositions. Sociology, 41(6): 1061-1077., DOI: 10.1177/0038038507082315

Anna Carreri, Work of relations, but which ones? Reciprocity effects on dual precarious knowledge workers couples in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 145/2017, pp. 94-111, DOI:10.3280/SL2017-145006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content