La dogmatica giuridica come scienza empirica irriducibile alla sociologia del diritto. Salvare la tesi weberiana della distinzione trascendendola

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori Edoardo Fittipaldi
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/1 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 22 P. 55-76 Dimensione file 475 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2017-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Albert, Hans, 1978. Traktat über rationale Praxis. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  2. —, 1987. Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  3. —, 1991. Traktat über kritische Vernunft. 5a edizione. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  4. —, 1994. Pragmatismus und kritischer Rationalismus. Zur Rolle pragmatischer Tendenzen im modernen Denken. In Kurt Salamum (ed.) Kritischer Rationa-lismus und Pragmatismus. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
  5. —, 2000. Kritischer Rationalismus. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  6. Berkeley, George, 1970[1734]. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. 2nd edition. Indianapolis: & New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
  7. Davies, E. Brian, 2004. A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism, --http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1681/1/pluralism16.pdf (visitato l’1 febbraio 2017).
  8. —, 2005a. Whither Mathematics? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52, 11: 1350-1356.
  9. —, 2005b. A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism. 13 (3): 252-276.
  10. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2003. Scienza del diritto e razionalismo critico. Il programma epistemologico di Hans Albert per scienza e la sociologia del diritto. Milano: Giuffrè.
  11. —, 2015a. Love, Anankasticity, and Human Rights: The Perspective of a Pet-rażyckian Continental Legal Realism. In Piotr Szymaniec (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality and the Protection of the Fundamental rights in the European States. Wałbrzych: Wydawnictwo Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej im. Angelusa Silesiusa w Wałbrzychu.
  12. —, 2015b. Contradictions as Empirical Incompatibilities: Bridging Psychology of Ethical Emotions with Normative Dogmatics. In Stefano Colloca & Paolo Di Lucia (eds.) L’impossibilità normativa. Milan: LED.
  13. —, 2016a. Jerzy Lande. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philos-ophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  14. —, 2016b. Introduction: Continental Legal Realism. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  15. Hart, Herbert L.A., 1957[1983]. Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence. In Her-bert L.A. Hart, Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  16. Kelsen, Hans, 1941. The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, 55, 1: 44-70.
  17. Lakatos, Imre, 1962[1978]. Infinite Regress and Foundations of Mathematics. In Imre Lakatos (John Worrall & Gregory Currie eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Lakatos, Imre, 1978. What Does a Mathematical Proof Prove? In Imre Lakatos (John Worrall & Gregory Currie eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Leiter, Brian, 2007. Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Olivecrona, Karl, 1948. Is a Sociological Explanation of Law Possible? Theoria, 14: 167-207.
  21. —, 1971. Law as Fact. 2a edizione. London: Stevens & Sons.
  22. Palombella G., 2001. Arguments in Favour of a Functional Theory of Fundamental Rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 14, 3: 299-326.
  23. —, 2007. From Human Rights to Fundamental Rights. Consequences of a concep-tual distinction. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 93, 3: 396-42.
  24. Pattaro, Enrico, 2005. The Law and the Right. A Reappraisal of the Reality that Ought to Be. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  25. —, 2016. Axel Hägerström at the Origins of the Uppsala School. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer
  26. Priest, Graham, 1987. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Dordrecht etc.: Martinus Nijhoff.
  27. Rosser, John Barkley, 1953. Logic for Mathematicians. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
  28. Sacco, Rodolfo, 1991. Legal Formants. A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 1: 1-34 & 39, 2: 343-401.
  29. Taylor, John R., 2003. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Weber, Max, 1913[1985]. Über einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie. In Johannes Winckelmann (Hrsg.) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  31. —, 1921-21[1976]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (Johannes Winckelmann Hrsg.). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Sie-beck).
  32. Zermelo, Ernst., 1904. Neuer Beweis, dass jede Menge Wohlordnung werden kann (Aus einem an Herrn Hilbert gerichteten Briefe). Mathematische Annalen, 59: 514-16.

Edoardo Fittipaldi, La dogmatica giuridica come scienza empirica irriducibile alla sociologia del diritto. Salvare la tesi weberiana della distinzione trascendendola in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2017, pp 55-76, DOI: 10.3280/SD2017-001004