Click here to download

The Clean Energy Package: Are its objectives always consistent?
Journal Title: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Author/s: Anna Creti, Jacques Percebois, Boris Solier 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  10 Pg. 5-14 FullText PDF:  177 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2016-002001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


On 30 November 2016, the European Commission published a proposal for a reform of energy markets titled "Clean Energy for all Europeans", better known as the "Winter Pack-age". Its aim is to speed up the integration of electricity markets in Europe and to further encourage the use of renewables and the pursuit of energy efficiency, while at the same time placing European consumers at the heart of this project. This Policy Brief sheds light on the Commission’s proposal - which runs to no less than 5000 pages - by examining its three major innovations and looking in depth at issues that remain unresolved in terms of pricing. Putting the consumer at the centre of the policy. In concrete terms, consumers must be able to participate more fully in the functioning of the electricity market, both as self-producers and as contributors to demand-side responses. Strengthening the governance of grids and markets. National capacity markets must be open to other Member States and to all technologies. The only exception is coal-fired power plants, the most polluting technology, which should be totally eliminated from the capacity markets in the long term. Improving the integration of renewables. The project puts an end to the priority of access to grids that has benefited renewables so far and recommends the eventual removal of production support mechanisms. The issue of electricity pricing appears to be inescapable given increasing inputs of decentralized renewable electricity that are destabilising the standard principle of electricity pricing at marginal cost. Alternatives - pricing at average cost or on the basis of capacity - will need to be explored. The central role of the carbon price and the implications of its insufficiently high level, which penalizes the competitiveness of low-carbon energies, are hidden. The reform of support mechanisms for renewables is no substitute for an ambitious carbon pricing policy.
Keywords: EU energy policy, electricity pricing, renewables, governance
Jel Code: L9, P43, Q48

  1. Agency for the Cooperation of Energy regulators (ACER) (2015). ACER Annual Activity Report for the year 2014. May 2015.
  2. Commission de Régulation de l’Energie (CRE) (2017). Réactions de la CRE au paquet énergie propre. Position paper, January 2017.
  3. De Perthuis C., Solier B. and Trotignon R. (2016). How should the EU ETS be reformed following the Paris agreement and Brexit? Climate Economics Chair, Policy Brief No. 2016-01, July 2016.
  4. European Commission (EC) (2015). Best practices on Renewable Energy Self-consumption. Staff Working Document COM(2015) 339 final, Brussels, July 2015.
  5. European Commission (EC) (2016). Clean Energy for All Europeans – unlocking Europe’s growth potential. Press release IP/16/4009, Brussels, November 2016. --Available on: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-4009_en.htm.
  6. European Commission (EC) (2016). Final Report of the Sector Inquiry on Capacity Mecha-nisms. COM(2016) 752 final, Brussels, November 2016.
  7. Hansen J-P. and Percebois J. (2015). Energie: Economie et politiques. De Boeck, 2nd Edition.
  8. Réseau de Transport d’électricté (RTE) (2014). Mécanisme de capacité. Rapport d’accompagnement et proposition de règles. Paris, April 2014.

Anna Creti, Jacques Percebois, Boris Solier, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2016, pp. 5-14, DOI:10.3280/EFE2016-002001

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content