Click here to download

Scalability and replicability analysis of smart grids demo projects: An overview of selected European approaches
Journal Title: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Author/s: Ilaria Losa, Rafael Cossent Arín, Andrea Rodriguez Calvo 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  28 Pg. 53-80 FullText PDF:  559 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2016-002004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The modernization of the European electricity grids is a key priority of the European energy policy that must be achieved in order to safely integrate renewable and decentralized generation, improve energy efficiency, and integrate the active consumers in the energy system. Several European and National research programs are investigating new technologies and solutions aimed at addressing these challenges. In order to speed up the shift from the stage of industrial research to the market uptake of the most innovative solutions, new methods shall be defined to ensure that the solutions demonstrated can be scaled up and replicated. These methods need to address not only technical aspects, but also the non-technical issues such as public acceptance of grid infrastructures or new market designs and products by all stakeholders and to harmonize regulation and legal framework. This paper analyses and compares the different approaches developed by important EU projects such as GRID+, GRID4EU, and IGREENGRID, to investigate the scalability and replicability potential of the solutions tested in smart grids pilot projects. Barriers and enabling factors that might limit or support the large-scale deployment of innovative solutions are presented and discussed. One of the most important problems identified is the difficulty to build reliable models of the representative distribution networks needed in the analyses, which might hinder the replicability of a given solution. The existence of an EU-wide repository of distribution grid data would facilitate future work. Moreover, the development of common standards is advised to support the interoperability of the most promising solutions and to guarantee the industrial competitiveness. Further research efforts are still required to the smart grids stakeholders community to elaborate a comprehensive approach. However, the overview of methodologies reported in the present paper represents a useful support for the project leaders that have to perform the scalability and replicability analysis of new pilot projects or regulators and policy-makers pondering to enable or support smart grid solutions. To achieve this, this paper highlights best practices, drivers, simulation tools and barriers encountered by the different projects. These aspects are key elements that shall be considered and further analyzed to build a comprehensive approach to the problem.
Keywords: Scalability, replicability, smart grids, power system regulations, distribution grids
Jel Code: L94, L50

  1. Amantegui J. and Ojanguren I. (2005). Automation of HV substations in Iberdrola: experiences and plans. In: Protective Relay Engineers, 2005 58th Annual Conference for.
  2. Bletterie B., “WP5: D5.1 Tech & Econ Evaluation of replicability and scalability of solutions to increase the DER”, 31.12.2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.igreengridfp7.eu/deliverables.
  3. Bondi A.B. (2000), Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance.
  4. Bonnefoy P. and Hansman R. (2008). Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: A Worldwide Perspective. MIT, Report No. ICAT-2008-02.
  5. Cossent R., Rodríguez A., Frías P., Losa I., Bassini A., Tornelli C. and G. Origo, “GRID4EU GWP3 Methodology for the definition of scaling up and replication rules and cost-benefit analysis of smart grids pilot projects”, November 2013. [Online]. --Available: www.grid4eu.com.
  6. European Commission, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank”, 25.02.2015. [Online]. --Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:1bd46c90-bdd4-11e4-bbe1-01aa75ed71a1.0001.03/DOC_1&format=PDF.
  7. European Commission, “Communications of the EC C(2015) 6317 final: Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan: Accelerating the European Energy System Transformation”, 2015. [Online]. --Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_EN_ACT_part1_v8_0.pdf.
  8. European Commission, “SET Plan: integrated Roadmap aimed at describing the research and innovation challenges and needs of the European energy systems”, December 2014.
  9. GRID+ consortium, “GRID+ final report” 30.11.2014. [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/.
  10. GRID+ consortium, “GRID+ project”, 2011. [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/about.
  11. GRID+ consortium, “GRID+ questionnarie for scalabilty and replicability assessment” [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/questionnaire. [Accessed 01.02.2016].
  12. GRID+ consortium, “Methodology to Assess Scalability and Replicability of Smart Grid Projects”, November 2012. [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/Documents/Deliverables/GRID+_D4.1_r0.pdf.
  13. GRID4EU consortium, “gD 3.4 – Results of the simulations carried out in the SRA for all demo”, January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/mediaprod/28987/abstract-gd3-4.pdf.
  14. GRID4EU consortium, “GRID4EU Final report”, January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/29375/grid4eu-final-report_normal-res.pdf.
  15. GRID4EU consortium, “Summary report on the replication potential in Belgium”, 31 January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/28763/grid4eu_gwp3_deliverable_gd37_final.pdf.
  16. GRID4EU consortium, “Summary report on the replication potential in Brazil and California”, 31 January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/28767/grid4eu_gwp3_deliverable_gd38_final.pdf.
  17. GRID4EU GWP3 partners, “gD3.1,” 2013.
  18. GRID4EU, “GRID4EU project”. [Online]. --Available: http://www.grid4eu.eu/. [Accessed 02.02.2016].
  19. IGREENGrid consortium, “IGREENGrid project”, 2013. [Online]. --Available: www.igreengrid-fp7.eu. [Accessed 07.03.2016].
  20. International Atomic Energy Agency (2009). Status and Trends of Nuclear Technologies.
  21. International Atomic Energy Agency. Jogalekar P. and Woodside M. (1998). Evaluating the scalability of distributed systems. In: System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on.
  22. Robles R.V. (2007). On wind power integration into electrical power system: Spain vs. Denmark. Electrical Power Quality and Utilization, EPQU.
  23. Sridhar P. and Madni A. (2009). Scalability and Performance Issues in Deeply Embedded Sensor Systems. SSCS IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society New, The Impact of Dennard’s Scaling Theory, 2007.
  24. Zhang Y. and Prica M. (2006). Imbedding Smart Relays in Large Electric Power Networks: The Scalability Problem and a Possible Solution. In: Power Symposium, 2006. NAPS 2006. 38th North American.
  25. Amantegui J. and Ojanguren I. (2005). Automation of HV substations in Iberdrola: experiences and plans. In: Protective Relay Engineers, 2005 58th Annual Conference for.
  26. Bletterie B., “WP5: D5.1 Tech & Econ Evaluation of replicability and scalability of solutions to increase the DER”, 31.12.2015. [Online]. --Available: http://www.igreengrid-fp7.eu/deliverables.
  27. Bondi A.B. (2000), Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance.
  28. Bonnefoy P. and Hansman R. (2008). Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: A Worldwide Perspective. MIT, Report No. ICAT-2008-02.
  29. Cossent R., Rodríguez A., Frías P., Losa I., Bassini A., Tornelli C. and G. Origo, “GRID4EU GWP3 Methodology for the definition of scaling up and replication rules and cost-benefit analysis of smart grids pilot projects”, November 2013. [Online]. --Available: www.grid4eu.com.
  30. European Commission, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank”, 25.02.2015. [Online]. --Available: http://eur-lex.
  31. europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:1bd46c90-bdd4-11e4-bbe1-01aa75ed71a1.0001.03/DOC
  32. _1&format=PDF.
  33. European Commission, “Communications of the EC C(2015) 6317 final: Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan: Accelerating the European Energy System Transformation”, 2015. [Online]. --Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/
  34. ener/files/documents/1_EN_ACT_part1_v8_0.pdf.
  35. European Commission, “SET Plan: integrated Roadmap aimed at describing the research and innovation challenges and needs of the European energy systems”, December 2014. [Online]. --Available: integrated Roadmap aimed at describing the research and innovation challenges and needs of the European energy systems.
  36. GRID+ consortium, “GRID+ final report” 30.11.2014. [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/.
  37. GRID+ consortium, “GRID+ project”, 2011. [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/about.
  38. GRID+ consortium, “GRID+ questionnarie for scalabilty and replicability assessment” [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/questionnaire. [Accessed 01.02.2016].
  39. GRID+ consortium, “Methodology to Assess Scalability and Replicability of Smart Grid Projects”, November 2012. [Online]. --Available: http://www.gridplus.eu/Documents/Deliverables/GRID+_D4.1_r0.pdf.
  40. GRID4EU consortium, “gD 3.4 – Results of the simulations carried out in the SRA for all demo”, January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/28987/abstract-gd3-4.pdf.
  41. GRID4EU consortium, “GRID4EU Final report”, January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/29375/grid4eu-final-report_normal-res.pdf.
  42. GRID4EU consortium, “Summary report on the replication potential in Belgium”, 31 January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/28763/grid4eu_gwp3_deliverable_gd37_final.pdf.
  43. GRID4EU consortium, “Summary report on the replication potential in Brazil and California”, 31 January 2016. [Online]. --Available: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/28767/grid4eu_gwp3_deliverable_gd38_final.pdf.
  44. GRID4EU GWP3 partners, “gD3.1,” 2013.
  45. GRID4EU, “GRID4EU project”. [Online]. --Available: http://www.grid4eu.eu/. [Accessed 02.02.2016].
  46. IGREENGrid consortium, “IGREENGrid project”, 2013. [Online]. --Available: www.igreengrid-fp7.eu. [Accessed 07.03.2016].
  47. International Atomic Energy Agency (2009). Status and Trends of Nuclear Technologies. International Atomic Energy Agency.
  48. Jogalekar P. and Woodside M. (1998). Evaluating the scalability of distributed systems. In: System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on.
  49. Robles R.V. (2007). On wind power integration into electrical power system: Spain vs. Denmark. Electrical Power Quality and Utilization, EPQU.
  50. Sridhar P. and Madni A. (2009). Scalability and Performance Issues in Deeply Embedded Sensor Systems.
  51. SSCS IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society New, The Impact of Dennard’s Scaling Theory, 2007.
  52. Zhang Y. and Prica M. (2006). Imbedding Smart Relays in Large Electric Power Networks: The Scalability Problem and a Possible Solution. In: Power Symposium, 2006. NAPS 2006. 38th North American.

Ilaria Losa, Rafael Cossent Arín, Andrea Rodriguez Calvo, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2016, pp. 53-80, DOI:10.3280/EFE2016-002004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content