Innovazione sociale e città

Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Autori/Curatori: Serena Vicari Haddock, Enzo Mingione
Anno di pubblicazione: 2017 Fascicolo: 113 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 17 P. 13-29 Dimensione file: 392 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SUR2017-113002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’articolo discute di innovazione sociale sulla base dell’analisi di Polanyi e di Marshall e dei contributi successivi che si sono sviluppati a partire da quel quadro teorico. Le ragioni dell’innovazione sociale vengono interpretate alla luce della crisi del welfare capitalism e dei disequilibri che si sono manifestati nelle istituzioni fonti di integrazione e coesione sociale. Gli autori propongono una valutazione dei processi e delle esperienze di innovazione sociale che ne mette in luce la rilevanza, ma anche l’ambivalenza e i limiti nel rispondere alla crisi.

  1. Andreotti A., Mingione E. (2014). Local welfare systems in Europe and the crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 3: 1-15. DOI: 10.1177/0969776414557191
  2. Caruso N. (2016). L’emergere dell’innovazione sociale nelle politiche per la casa. Rivista online di Urban@it, 1.
  3. D’Ovidio M. (2016). The creative city does not exist. Milano: Ledizioni - LediPublishing.
  4. De Weerdt J., Garcia M. (2016). Housing crisis: the Platform of Mortgage Victims (PAH) movement in Barcelona and innovations in governance. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 3: 471-93.
  5. Della Porta D. (2015). Social Movements in Times of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  6. Della Porta D., Andretta M. (2002). Social movements and public administration: Spontaneous citizens’ committees in Florence. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2: 244-265. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00378
  7. Esping-Andersen G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Esping-Andersen G. (2002). Social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Blackwell.
  9. European Union (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Bruxelles, Maggio 2010.
  10. Evers A., Guillemard A.M. (2013). Introduction: Marshall’s concept of citizenship and contemporary welfare reconfiguration. In Evers A., Guillemard A.M. (Eds.). Social policy and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Fraser N. (2011). Marketization, social protection, emancipation: Towards a neo-Polanyan conception of the capitalist crisis. In Calhoun C., Derluguian G. (Eds.). Business as usual: The roots of the global financial meltdown. New York: NYU Press.
  12. Fraser N. (2013). A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after Polanyi. New Left Review, 81: 119-132. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45590-7_3
  13. Fraser N. (2014). Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-Polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. Economy and Society, 4: 541-558. DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2014.898822
  14. Klein J.L., Harrison D. (2007). L’innovation sociale. Emergence et effects sur la transformation des sociétés. Montreal: Presse de l’Université du Québec.
  15. Klein, J.L., Laville J.L., Moulaert F. (a cura di). (2014). L’innovation sociale. Paris: Erès.
  16. Leveque B., Fontan J.M., Klein, J.L. (2014). L’innovation sociale. Les marches d’une construction théorique et pratique. Quebec: Presse de l’Université du Quebec.
  17. Marshall T.H. (1972). Cittadinanza e classe sociale. Torino: UTET.
  18. Martinelli F. (2013). Learning from case studies of social innovation in the field of social services: Creatively balancing top-down universalism with bottom-up democracy. In Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A. (a cura di). International handbook of social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  19. Moulaert F. (2009). Social innovation: Institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. In Mac Callum D., Moulaert F., Hillier J., Vicari Haddock S. (Eds.). Social Innovation and Territorial Development. Burlington: Ashgate.
  20. Moulaert F., Vicari Haddock S. (2009). Rigenerare la città. Bologna: il Mulino.
  21. Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  22. Mulgan G., Tucker, S., Rushanara A., Sanders B. (2006). Social Innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Working Paper of the Said Business School.
  23. Murray R., Caulier-Grice J., Mulgan G. (2010). The open book on social innovation. London: The Young Foundation.
  24. Parés M., Ospina S.M., Subirats J. (2017). Social Innovation and Democratic Leadership. Communities and Social Change from Below. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  25. Piketty T. (2013). Le capital au XXIe siècle. Paris: Seuil.
  26. Pirone F. (2012). L’innovazione sociale: l’estensione semantica di un concetto in ascesa politica. Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 4: 137-150.
  27. Polanyi K. (2001). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
  28. Sassen S. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press/Belknap.
  29. Rossi U., Di Bella A. (2017). Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A, 5: 999-1018. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17690153
  30. Semprebon M., Vicari Haddock S. (2016). Innovative housing practices involving immigrants: the case of self-building in Italy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 3: 439-55.
  31. Streeck W. (2011). Taking capitalism seriously: Towards an institutional approach to contemporary political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 1: 137-167.
  32. Streeck W. (2012). How to study contemporary capitalism? Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 1: 1-28. DOI: 10.1017/S000397561200001X
  33. Swyngedouw E. (2007). The Post Political City. Rotterdam: Urban Politics Now.
  34. Vitale T., Membretti A. (2013). Just another roll of dice: a socially creative initiative to assure Roma Housing in North Western Italy. In Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Vitale T. (2010). Building a Shared Interest. Olinda, Milan: Social Innovation between Strategy and Organizational Learning. In Moulaert F., Swingedouw E., Martinelli F., Gonzàlez S. (Eds). Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social innovation. London: Routledge.

  • Contestualizzare le politiche urbane di sostenibilità: il ruolo del capitale sociale territoriale Marco Castrignanò, Alessandra Landi, in PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro 1/2018 pp.26
    DOI: 10.3280/PRI2017-001003
  • New Workplaces—Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories Marianna d’Ovidio, pp.65 (ISBN:978-3-030-63442-1)
  • Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy Teresa Carlone, Federica Gatta, Cécile Léonardi, Ianira Vassallo, in City, Territory and Architecture 21/2022
    DOI: 10.1186/s40410-022-00157-2

Serena Vicari Haddock, Enzo Mingione, Innovazione sociale e città in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 113/2017, pp 13-29, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2017-113002