Click here to download

About the employers’ representativeness
Journal Title: GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI  
Author/s: Pierangelo Albini 
Year:  2017 Issue: 154 Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 265-280 FullText PDF:  200 KB
DOI:  10.3280/GDL2017-154004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Understanding the reasons that have brought to the disruption of representativeness rules, also helps to understand, today, the causes which undermine the proper functioning of the same rules. This would also help to reflect on the necessity of "taking decisions" so as to allow the development of representativeness rules in an evolutive perspective. The concepts of identity and relationship represent the first subject of research of this work, which refers to Confindustria and to collective bargaining. Firstly, it is necessary to overcome all kind of neo-corporative temptation in the debate on representativeness rules. This means that we must overcome the idea for which the representation of interests - today, still mostly based on a sectoral approach - can accomplish its mission by reproposing exclusively neo-corporative models and approaches both to society and to the economic system. If this approach on representativeness will be overcome, both the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of representativeness will gain a new dignity, with an evaluation to be made case by case, having regard to the single objectives to be achieved. These two dimensions must, in fact, be affirmed not only at individual level, but also taking into account their complementarity.
Keywords: Political representation; Trade Union representation; Representativeness rules; Trade Unions; Industrial relations; Collective bargaining; Neo-corporative temptation.

  1. Berger S., ed. (1981). Organ¬izing interests in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (trad. it. 1983).
  2. Bonhoeffer D. (2015). Resistenza e resa. Lettere e scritti dal carcere. Milano: San Paolo Edizioni.
  3. Cacciari M. (2016). Grandezza e tramonto dell’utopia. In: Cacciari M., Prodi P., Occidente senza utopie. Bologna: il Mulino.
  4. Castronovo V. (2010). Cento anni di imprese. Storia di Confindustria 1910-2010. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  5. De Rita G. (2010). Nuove dinamiche di rappresentanza. I&S: 13 ss.
  6. De Rita G. (2014). Il popolo e gli dei. Cosi la grande crisi ha separato gli italiani. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  7. Lindberg L.N., Maier C.S., eds. (1985). The politics of inflation and economic stagnation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
  8. Mancuso V. (2016). Il coraggio di essere liberi. Milano: Garzanti.
  9. Marcolongo A. (2016). La lingua geniale. 9 ragioni per amare il greco. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  10. Moretti E. (2012). La nuova geografia del lavoro. Milano: Mondadori.
  11. Pasquino G. (2009). I problemi della rappresentanza politica. Roma: Enciclopedia Treccani.
  12. Rullani E. (2010). Modernità sostenibile. Idee, filiere e servizi per uscire dalla crisi. Venezia: Marsilio.
  13. Rullani E. (2011). Verso una società imprenditoriale consapevole. In: Nardozzi G., Paolazzi L., a cura di, Costruire il futuro. Roma: Sipi.

Pierangelo Albini, About the employers’ representativeness in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 154/2017, pp. 265-280, DOI:10.3280/GDL2017-154004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content