Consumer behaviours and attitudes towards a circular economy: Knowledge and culture as determinants in a four-market analysis

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Claudio Siminelli
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/1-2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 35 P. 135-169 Dimensione file 447 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2017-001008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This work assesses the role of consumers in the transition towards a circular economy, taking into account four sectors: clothes, household electrical appliances, paper and food. It relies on a sample of 700 respondents to a specifically designed survey. The sample is divided into two subsamples, in Italy and Sweden, to evaluate a potential geographical bias. The work is developed through three research questions. First, in each of the four sectors, people meditate upon the environmental impact of a good in different moments of what this work defines personal lifecycle, i.e. the stages when they actually come into contact with the product (purchase, utilisation and disposal). The results show that individuals display environmental concerns in the disposal stage, rather then when buying or using a product, but there is evidence of a possible geographical bias. Then, the work econometrically evaluates the determinants behind green behaviours, in terms of attitudes (pro-environmental self-identity), knowledge (of environmental labels) and culture (individualism). Individuals that claim to be green seem to actually behave correctly; knowledge of green labels positively affects behaviours in sectors where these labels are widespread; there is no evidence for individualism to act on green behaviour. Age affects behaviours on appliances and clothes. Being female positively influences behaviours. Lastly, the work econometrically assesses variables affecting the propensity toward circular products. Being careful to environmental issues positively affects the willingness to buy such goods. Individualism negatively impacts on the propensity to circularity in sectors characterised by design and fashion. Age, education and gender do not affect propensity to these goods.

Keywords:Circular economy, consumer behaviour, environmental concern, green consumer, individualism, pro-environmental self-identity, knowledge, eco-labels

Jel codes:D12, Q53, Q56

  1. Accenture (2014). Circular Advantage. Innovative Business Models and Technologies to Create Value in a World without Limits to Growth, vol. 24. Accenture.
  2. Axelsson K. (2012). Global Miljöpåverkan Och Lokala Fotavtryck: Analys Av Fyra Svenska Kommuners Totala Konsumtion. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.
  3. Becker C. (2006). The human actor in ecological economics: Philosophical approach and research perspectives. Ecological Economics, 60(1): 17-23.
  4. Boulding K.E. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy: Essays from the Sixth RFF Forum. John Hopkins University Press, 3-14.
  5. Burge T. (1986). Individualism and Psychology. The Philosophical Review, 1: 3-45.
  6. Chan R.Y. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4): 389-413.
  7. Chen F.F., West S.G. (2008). Measuring individualism and collectivism: The importance of considering differential components, reference groups, and measurement invariance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42: 259-294.
  8. Clark M., Ouellette R., Powell M., Milberg S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 94-103. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.94
  9. Cooper T. (2013). Sustainability, consumption and the throwaway culture. In: Walker S., Giard J., Walker H.L. (Eds.). The Handbook of Design for Sustainability. Bloomsbury.
  10. Corr A., Schulman J., Ibanez P. (2010). The Volatility of Raw Materials. Risk Management Magazine, 1-6-2010.
  11. Cozma I. (2011). How are individualism and collectivism measured? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(1): 11-17.
  12. Darnall N. (2008). What the Federal Government Can Do to Encourage Green Production. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government, Presidential Transition Series.
  13. Darnall N., Ponting C., Vazquez-Brust D.A. (2012). Why consumers buy green. In: Vazquez-Brust D.A., Sarkis J., Green Growth: Managing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy. Greening of Indistry Network Studies Volume 1 (Eds.). Springer: New York: 287-308.
  14. Debo L.G., Toktay L.B., Van Wassenhove L.N. (2005). Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Science, 51(8): 1193-1205.
  15. Dermody J., Hanmer-Lloyd S., Koenig-Lewis N., Lifen Zhao A. (2015). Advancing sustainable consumption in the UK and China: the mediating effect of pro-environmental self-identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13-14): 1472-1502.
  16. Dobson A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15: 276-285.
  17. Dryzek J.S. (1996). Foundations for environmental political economy: The search for homo ecologicus? New Political Economy, 1: 27-40. DOI: 10.1080/13563469608406236
  18. Eckersley R. (2006). Is modern Western culture a health hazard? International Journal of Epidemiology, 35: 252-258.
  19. Eilam E., Trop T. (2012). Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Behavior – Which Is the Horse and Which Is the Cart? Sustainability, 4: 2210-2246.
  20. Elia V., Gnoni M.G., Tornese F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4): 2741-2751.
  21. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012). Towards the Circular Economy 1: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition.
  22. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Towards the Circular Economy 2: Opportunities for the consumer goods sector.
  23. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). The Circular Economy Applied to the Automotive Industry.
  24. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2014). Towards the Circular Economy 3: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains.
  25. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015). Towards a Circular Economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition.
  26. Ellen MacArthur Foundation and McKinsey (2015). Growth Within: A Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe. EMF, McKinsey Center for Business and Environment.
  27. Eriksson, C. (2008). Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated-products example. Resource and Energy Economics, 26: 281-293.
  28. Eurobarometer (2009). Flash EB 256, Europeans’ attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production – Analytical report. European Commission.
  29. Eurobarometer (2013). Flash EB 367, Attitudes of Europeans towards building the single market for green products. European Commission.
  30. Eurobarometer (2014). Flash EB 388, Attitudes of Europeans towards waste management and resource efficiency. European Commission.
  31. European Commission (2015). Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM(2015) 614 Final, European Commission.
  32. European Commission (2015). Consumer Condition Scoreboard: Consumers at home in the Single Market. DG Justice and Consumers, European Commission. ISSN 2466-9687.
  33. European Commission (2016). Study on socioeconomic impacts of increased reparability – Final Report. DG Environment, European Commission and Deloitte.
  34. European Environment Agency (2016). Circular economy in Europe – Developing the knowledge base, EEA Report No 2/2016.
  35. European Environment Agency (2016). More from less – material resource efficiency in Europe, EEA Report No 10/2016.
  36. European Environment Agency (2016). Communication, environment and behaviour. EEA Report No 13/2016.
  37. European Parliament (2016). A longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies. DG Internal Policies, Policy Dept. A: Economic and Scientific Policy.
  38. Evans J.R., Mathur A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2): 195-219. DOI: 10.1108/10662240510590360
  39. Genovese A., Acquaye A.A., Figueroa A., Koh S.C.L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66: 344-357.
  40. George D.A.R., Chi-Ang Lin B., Chen Y. (2015). A circular economy model of economic growth. Environmental Modelling & Software, 73: 60-63.
  41. Ghisellini P., Cialani C., Ulgiati S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114: 11-32.
  42. Global Footprint Network (2015). Today is the Ecological Deficit Day for the United States. Global Footprint Network press release, 14-07-2015.
  43. Gullstrand Edbring E., Lehner M., Mont O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123: 5-15.
  44. Il Sole 24 Ore (2016). La Via C., La Posta L., L’economia circolare è ora un business. 1-11.
  45. Iraldo F., Bruschi I. (2015). Economia Circolare: principi guida e casi studio. GEO, Green Economy Observatory, IEFE Bocconi. -- www.geo.unibocconi.it/incontri+e+materiali.
  46. Iraldo F., Bruschi I. (2016). Meglio rifabbricato che nuovo. Materia Rinnovabile, 9: 28-32.
  47. Jones S., Murphy F., Edwards M., James J. (2008). Doing things differently: advantages and disadvantages of web questionnaires. Nurse Researcher, 15(4): 15-26.
  48. Joshi Y., Rahman Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3: 128-143.
  49. Jung H.Y. (1991). Marxism and Deep Ecology in Postmodernity: From Homo Oeconomicus To Homo Ecologicus. Thesis Eleven, 28: 86-99. DOI: 10.1177/072551369102800107
  50. Kardes F.R., Allen C.T., Pontes M.J. (1993). Effects of Multiple Measurement Operations on Consumer Judgment: Measurement Reliability or Reactivity? In: McAlister L., Rothschild M.L., NA – Advances in Consumer Research Volume 20 (eds.), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 280-283.
  51. Karna J., Juslin H., Ahonen V., Hansen E.N. (2001). Green advertising: greenwash or a true reflection of marketing strategies? Green Management International, 33: 33-70.
  52. La Trobe H.L., Acott T.G. (2000). A modified NEP/DSP environmental attitudes scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 32: 12-21. DOI: 10.1080/00958960009598667
  53. Lacy P., Rutqvist J. (2015). Waste to Wealth – The Circular Economy Advantage, Palagrave Macmillan.
  54. Lanzini P. (2013). The Effects of Rewards on Spillover in Environmental Behaviours: Monetary vs Praise Rewards. Ca’ Foscari University, Venice, Italy.
  55. Lieder M., Rashid A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115: 36-51.
  56. Ling-Yee L. (1997). Effect of Collectivist Orientation and Ecological Attitude on Actual Environmental Commitment. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4): 31-53.
  57. Loureiro M.L., McCluskey J.J., Mittelhammer R.C. (2001). Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labeled, and regular apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(2): 404-416.
  58. Marangon F., Tempesta T., Troiano S., Vecchiato D. (2014). Rivista di Economia Agraria, 2-3: 201-209.
  59. Marsiglia A.J. (2010). Cultural effects on consumer behavior. www.lead-inspire.com, 26-12.
  60. Mills B., Schleich J. (2009). What’s driving energy efficient appliance label awareness and purchase propensity? Energy Policy, 38: 814-825.
  61. Mostafa M.M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behavior: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31: 220-229.
  62. Murray A., Skene K., Haynes K. (2015). The Circular Economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and its application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140.
  63. Peattie K., Crane A. (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce, or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8: 357-370. DOI: 10.1108/13522750510619733
  64. Perrini F., Castaldo S., Misani N., Tencati A. (2010). The impact of corporate social responsibility associations on trust in organic products marketed by mainstream retailers: a study of Italian consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19: 512-526.
  65. Piciu G.C., Ipate I., Bogdan A. (2015). New Theoretical and Practical Approaches of Implementing The Circular Economy for The Preservation of Natural Resources. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22: 124-130.
  66. Prothero A., Dobscha S., Freund J., Kilbourne W.E., Luchs M.G., Ozanne L.K., Thøghersen J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1): 31-38.
  67. Ramayah T., Rahbar E. (2013). Greening the environment through recycling: an empirical study. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24 (6): 782-801.
  68. Rettie R., Burchell K., Riley D. (2012). Normalising green behaviours: A new approach to sustainability marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3-4): 420-444.
  69. Robèrt K.H. (1991). The physician and the environment. Reviews in Oncology. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 4(2), 1-3.
  70. Sammer K., Wüstenhagen R. (2006). The Influence of Eco-labeling on Consumer Behaviour – Results of a Discrete Choice Analysis for Washing Machines. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15: 185-199.
  71. Schwepker C.H., Cornwell B.T. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10: 77-101.
  72. Seitz M.A. (2007). A critical assessment of motives for product recovery: the case of engine remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11): 1147-1157.
  73. Shaw D.S., Hogg G., Wilson E., Shiu E., Hassan L. (2006). Fashion victim: the impact of fair trade concerns on clothing choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4): 423-436. DOI: 10.1080/09652540600956426
  74. Simmonds P.L. (1862). Undeveloped substances: or, hints for enterprise in neglected fields. London: Robert Hardwicke.
  75. Singelis T.M., Triandis H.C., Bhawuk D.P.S., Gelfand M.J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29: 240-275. DOI: 10.1177/106939719502900302
  76. Singh J., Ordoñez I. (2016). Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134: 342-353.
  77. Stahel W.R., Reday-Mulvey G. (1976). Jobs for tomorrow: The potential for substituting manpower for energy. DG Manpower, Brussels, European Commission.
  78. Solomon R.M. (1996). Consumer behavior: Buying, Having and Being (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  79. Stefan V., Van Herpen E., Tudoran A.A., Lähteenmäki L. (2013). Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1): 375-381.
  80. Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockström J., Cornell S.E., Fetzer I., Bennett E.M., Biggs R., Carpenter S.R., de Vries W., de Wit C.A., Folke C., Gerten D., Heinke J., Mace G.M., Persson L.M., Ramanathan V., Reyers B., Sörlin S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
  81. Technologist (2016). The circular economy: a boost for growth. 17-10.
  82. Teisl M.F., Peavey S., Newman F., Buono J., Hermann M. (2002). Consumer reactions to environmental labels for forest products: A preliminary look. Forest Products Journal, 52: 44-50.
  83. Testa F., Iraldo F., Vaccari A., Ferrari E. (2015). Why Eco-labels can be Effective Marketing Tools: Evidence from a Study on Italian Consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(4): 252-265.
  84. The Guardian (2015). Howard, E. Humans have already used up 2015’s supply of Earth’s resources. 12.8.
  85. Tikka P., Kuitunen M., Tynys S. (2000). Effects of educational background on students’ attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 31: 12-19. DOI: 10.1080/00958960009598640
  86. Tilikidou I., Delistavrou A. (2001). Utilization of Selected Demographics and Psychographics in Recycling Behavior Understanding: A Focus on Materialism. Greener Management International Journal, 34: 75-93.
  87. Tilikidou I., Delistavrou A. (2008). Types and influential factors of consumers’ non-purchasing ecological behaviors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17: 61-76.
  88. Triandis H.C., Gelfland M.J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 118-128. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.118
  89. Umpfenbach K. (2014). Influences on consumer behaviour: Policy implications beyond nudging. European Commission.
  90. Umweltbundesamt (2016). Lifetime of electrical appliances becoming shorter and shorter, 15.2.2016.
  91. UN (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  92. van Lenteren J.C. (1997). From Homo economicus to Homo ecologicus: towards environmentally safe pest control. Modern Agriculture and the Environment, Ch.1, 17-31. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5418-5_2
  93. van Weelden E., Mugge R., Bakker C. (2016). Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113: 743-754.
  94. Vantomme D., Geuens M., De Houwer J., de Pelsmacker P. (2005). Implicit attitudes toward green consumer behaviour. Psychologica Belgica, 45(4): 217-239.
  95. Wang Y., Hazen B.T. (2016). Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products. International. Journal of Production Economics, 181: 460-469.
  96. World Economic Forum (2014). Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains.
  97. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF – formerly World Wildlife Fund) (2008). Living Planet Report 2008. WWF International.
  98. Yin J., Gao Y., Xu H. (2014). Survey and analysis of consumers’ behaviour of waste mobile phone recycling in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 517-525.
  99. Young W., Hwang K., McDonald S., Oates C.J. (2010). Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour when Purchasing Products. Sustainable Development, 18: 20-31.

  • How fashion can achieve sustainable development through a circular economy and stakeholder engagement: A systematic literature review Chung‐Wha (Chloe) Ki, Sze Man Chong, Jung E. Ha‐Brookshire, in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management /2020 pp.2401
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.1970
  • Consumer behavior in the circular economy: Developing a product-centric framework Tetiana Shevchenko, Michael Saidani, Meisam Ranjbari, Jakub Kronenberg, Yuriy Danko, Kirsi Laitala, in Journal of Cleaner Production 135568/2023 pp.135568
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135568
  • Management, Tourism and Smart Technologies Lucero Nicole Huerta-Tantalean, Nataly Alexis Carrasco-Carrasco, Maria Eugenia Castillo-Silva, Franklin Cordova-Buiza, Wilver Auccahuasi, pp.60 (ISBN:978-3-031-43732-8)

Claudio Siminelli, Consumer behaviours and attitudes towards a circular economy: Knowledge and culture as determinants in a four-market analysis in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1-2/2017, pp 135-169, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2017-001008