Click here to download

Towards a territory-based economic model for regional energy efficiency programmes: Learning from past initiatives
Author/s: Stanislas Nösperger, Christian du Tertre, Dominique Osso, Frédéric Marteau 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  21 Pg. 95-115 FullText PDF:  348 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2017-003006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Many Energy Efficiency (EE) programmes have been undertaken in the name of Energy savings and with a view to efficiency-cost assessment. Energy savings targets had to be met. In this case, the relevant question was to find the least expensive way of achieving this when considering a merit order on which EE actions are ordered given a ratio expressed in €/saved MWh. Many energy suppliers have been involved in this programme in order to meet their EE obligations (e.g. in a white certificate scheme) or in the frame of territorial industrial challenge (undersized energy transport or distribution network for instance). Yet such EE local programmes could be carried out in the frame of self-financed and economically viable activity. However, relevant economic models based on a territorial and multi-partnership approach must be identified. This paper is based on the review of several EE regional programmes with the insight of the functional economic model in order to identify key success factors to the development of such economic models. Findings underlined the crucial importance of the consideration of specific local challenge - beyond energy aspects - when designing an EE scheme, for instance, the problems raised by an aging local population or by increasing fuel poverty. The ability to manage deep partnership with an approach focused on "functional sphere" instead of driven by a traditional sector-based vision is a key point. For instance a comprehensive intermediation activity (technical, financial and professional) is a key added value source to monetize and to convert into financial flow. It is also important to develop a long-term relevant assessment procedure beyond traditional measurable effects (energy savings) and which encompasses intangible effects. These findings should complete popular business-model tools so that this "functional sphere" based vision can be embodied in a more comprehensive, sustainability and territorial-based economic model canvas!
Keywords: Energy Efficiency programmes, assessment, economic development, functional economy, regional programme.
Jel Code: R11, Q49, O18

  1. Aste N., Buzzetti M., Caputo P., Manfren M. (2014). Local energy efficiency programs: a monitoring methodology for Heating systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13: 69-77.
  2. Blackhurst M., Azevedo I.L., Matthews H.S., Hendrickson C.T. (2011). Designing building energy efficiency programs for greenhouse gas reductions. Energy Policy, 39: 5269-5279.
  3. BPIE (2014), Renovation strategy of selected EU countries: a status report on compliance with article 4 of the energy efficiency directive, BPIE on-line publication --
  4. Broc J.-S. (2006). L’évaluation ex-post des opérations locales de maitrise de la demande en énergie. Etat de l’art, méthodes bottom-up, exemples appliqués et approche du développement d’une culture pratique de l’évaluation. PhD Thesis. MINES ParisTech.
  5. CPUC (California Public Utility Commission) (2001). California Standard Practice Manual: Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Programs and Projects. San Francisco: California Public Utilities Commission -- ( 07j_cpuc_standard_ practice_manual.pdf).
  6. Du Tertre C. (2011). Modèles économiques d’entreprise, dynamique macroéconomique et développement
  7. durable. In: Gaglio G., Lauriol J., du Tertre C. L’économie de la fonctionnalité : une voie nouvelle vers un développement durable? Octarès Publishing.
  8. EDF (2014). Sécurisation de l’alimentation électrique -- J., Tricoire (2016). Rénover plus vert: les obstacles à la « montée en compétences » des artisans du bâtiment. Formation Emploi: 93-114.
  9. Guennec J., Nösperger S. (2009). An evaluation based on Service Economy theory: the case of an EDF-supported refurbishment program in rural area. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee), 2009 Summer Study Proceedings.
  10. Grubb M., Hourcade J.-C., Neuhoff K. (2014). Planetary Economics, Energy, climate change and the three domains of the sustainable development. Earthcan from Routledge editions.
  11. I+C (2007). Evaluation d’impact du programme MDE 52-55. private EDF report.
  12. International Energy Agency (2014). Capturing the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency.
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Climate change 2014: fifth assessment synthesis report. Approved summary for policy makers. Geneva. Killip G., Janda K., Fawcett T., Beillan V., Nösperger S. (2013). Building Expertise: industry responses to the low-energy housing retrofit agenda in the UK and France. ECEEE Summer Study 2013 proceedings.
  14. Kotnarovsky G., Morel L., Le Bezvoet M., Nösperger S., Guidat C. (2013). Functional economy: pertinence of principles for an energy efficiency program. International Journal for Energy, Environment and Economics, 21(4).
  15. Kotnarovsky G., Lejeune C. (2016). Comment favoriser la transition énergétique dans la renovation des bâtiments via l’implication des parties prenantes? L’approche contractuelle du modèle économique de Savecom (EDF). RIODD 2016 proceedings.
  16. Noailly J. (2012). Improving the energy efficiency of buildings: The impact of environmental policy on technological innovation. Energy Economics, 34: 795-806.
  17. Nösperger S., Killip G., Janda K. (2011). Building Expertise: ASystem of Professions Approach to Low-Carbon Refurbishment in the UK and France. ECEEE Summer Study 2011 proceedings.
  18. Nösperger S., Mazoyer J.-L., Vitt E. (2015). Making non-energy benefits a real asset and changing professionals’ habits: renew the partnership approach through the DECADIESE method. ECEEE 2015 Proceedings. Osso D., Nösperger S., Raynaud M. (2016). Regional efficiency programme valuating energy and multiple benefits: a balance between bill and comfort and far beyond. IEPEC 2016 proceedings.
  19. Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  20. Pearce D., Atkinson G., Mourato S. (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Recent Developments. OECD, Paris.
  21. Schiller Associates (2000). M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects – Version 2.2, U.S. Department of Energy – Federal Energy Management Program.
  22. Stahel W. (1994). The Utilization-Focused Service Economy: Resource Efficiency and Product-Life Extension. National Academy Press Office (202-334-3313).
  23. Stahel W. (1997). The Functional Economy: Cultural and Organizational Change. In: Richards D.J. (Ed.). The Industrial Green Game: Implications for Environmental Design and Management (pp. 91-100). National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  24. Stahel W. (2006). The performance economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  25. Suerkemper F., Thomas S., Osso D., Baudry P. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programmes-evaluating the impacts of a regional programme in France. Energy Efficiency, 5: 121-135.
  26. Tirado Herrero S., Arena D., Ürge-Vorsatz D., Telegdy A. (2011). Co-benefits quantified: employment, energy, security and fuel poverty implications of the large-scale, deep retrofitting of the Hungarian building stock. ECEEE 2011 Proceedings.
  27. Ürge Vorstatz D. (2009). Counting good: quantifying the co-benefits of improved efficiency in buildings. ECEEE 2009 Proceedings.

Stanislas Nösperger, Christian du Tertre, Dominique Osso, Frédéric Marteau, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 3/2017, pp. 95-115, DOI:10.3280/EFE2017-003006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content