Click here to download

Zygmunt Bauman e la modernità dell’Olocausto: fra crucialità delle domande e debolezza delle risposte
Author/s: Vincenzo Romania 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  13 Pg. 75-87 FullText PDF:  190 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SISS2018-001008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The article discusses the public relevance, argumentations and relations with the broader social theory of what in our opinion is Zygmunt Bauman’s most important sociological text, Modernity and the Holocaust. The article is organised in three parts. First, it discusses the relationships between Bauman’s and Hannah Arendt’s social theory in particular with respect to Arendt’s ‘continuism’ hypothesis, as discussed in The Origins of Totalitarianism. Second, we suggest the relevance of Bauman’s text as an example of public sociology. Finally, the two main thematic directives of the book are discussed: the relationship between the Holocaust and racism and between the Holocaust and modernity, highlighting the particularly problematic as-pects of the re-reading of Max Weber’s theory. The conclusions discuss the epistemological and ontological assumptions of the text, arguing that in our opinion Modernity and the Holocaust is far more important for the questions it poses to social theory than for the answers it provides.
Keywords: Holocaust studies; social theory; cultural studies; Max Weber; Hannah Arendt.

  1. Alexander J.C., Smith P. (2005). (a cura di). The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Arendt H. (1967). Le origini del totalitarismo. Milano: Comunità.
  3. Arendt H. (1964). La banalità del male – Eichmann a Gerusalemme. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  4. Bauman Z. (1979). Cultura e Prassi. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  5. Bauman Z. (1992). Modernità e Olocausto. Bologna: il Mulino.
  6. Bauman Z. (2005). Modernità liquida. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  7. Berger P., Berger B., Kellner H. (1973). The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. London: Irvington.
  8. Connell R.W. (1997). Why is Classical Theory Classical?. In: «American Journal of Sociology» 6: 1511-1557.
  9. du Gay P. (1999). Is Bauman’s bureau Weber’s bureau? A comment. In: The British Journal of Sociology, 50 (4): 575-587.
  10. Elias N. (1988). Il processo di civilizzazione. Bologna: il Mulino.
  11. Fredrikson G. (2016). Breve storia del razzismo, Roma: Donzelli.
  12. Habermas J. (2002). Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  13. Hennis W. (1988). Max Weber: Essays in Reconstruction. London: Allen & Unwin.
  14. Horkheimer H. e Adorno T. (1966). Dialettica dell’Illuminismo. Torino: Einaudi.
  15. Messina A. (2017). American Sociology and Holocaust Studies: The Alleged Silence and the Creation of the Sociological Delay. Boston: Academic Studies Press.
  16. Mommsen H. (2003). La soluzione finale: come si e giunti allo sterminio degli ebrei. Bologna: il Mulino.
  17. Taguieff P. A. (1988). La force du préjugé: essai sur le racisme et ses doubles. Paris: La Découverte.
  18. Weber M. (1991). L’etica protestante e lo spirito del capitalismo. Milano: Rizzoli.
  19. Weber M. (2005). Economia e Società. Milano: Comunità.

Vincenzo Romania, in "SICUREZZA E SCIENZE SOCIALI" 1/2018, pp. 75-87, DOI:10.3280/SISS2018-001008


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content