Clicca qui per scaricare

Seoul, city of sharing and collaboration: the rise of an urban ecosystem of social innovation
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI 
Autori/Curatori: Monica Bernardi 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2018 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  23 P. 71-93 Dimensione file:  376 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SP2018-002004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


To face and solve growing urban challenges, calls for innovative and creative solutions have become more and more commonplace. Although the promotion of a single successful social innovation policy might be relatively easy, to set up an ecosystem of social innovation that enables long-term changes requires more effort. According to the scientific literature, a systematic approach, new types of leadership and an appropriate governance model that is both multilevel and collaborative, are required. Following this theoretical framework, the author looks to an Asian city that can be considered in the vanguard of social innovation: Seoul. The mayor, Park Won-Soon is currently progressing with plans to build an innovation-led sharing city. This paper illustrates the creation of the social innovation ecosystem, with a special focus on the "Sharing City, Seoul" project. It examines the role of local government, its ability to rely on new intermediary organisations, and its efforts to modify the culture of the administration and improve citizen engagement. A qualitative approach based on multiple sources of evidence has enabled the development of a conceptual model that describes the current shape and features of the Seoul social innovation ecosystem. The results highlight the importance of conscious and targeted public action for the promotion and spread of pervasive sharing and innovative practices in the city.


Keywords: Social Innovation; Sharing City; Governance; Seoul; Urban Ecosystem.

  1. Goldenberg, M., Kamoji, W., Orton, L. and Williamson, M. 2009. Social Innovation in Canada: an update, Ottawa: CPRN - Canadian Policy Research Networks, Research Report.
  2. Acquier, A. and Carbone, V. 2018. Sharing economy and social innovation. In N. Davidson, M. Finck and J. Unfranca Eds. The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of the Sharing Economy (forthcoming). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bauwens, M. 2012. Blueprint for P2P Society: The Partner State & Ethical Economy. Shareable. https://bit.ly/2IB5LA0.
  4. Bauwens, M. and Kostakis, V. 2014. Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. New York: Palgrave Pivot Macmillan.
  5. BEPA. 2011. Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in Europe, Bruxelles: European Commission.
  6. Bernardi, M. and Diamantini, D. 2016. I modelli di governance della sharing economy. Due casi a confronto: Milano Sharing City e Sharing City Seoul. In E. Polizzi and M. Bassoli Eds., Le Politiche della Condivisione, pp. 105-136. Milano: Giuffré.
  7. Bernardi, M. and Mura, G. 2018. Sharing economy e istituzioni pubbliche: l’innovazione sociale nei contesti urbani. Sociologia Italiana. Ais Journal of Sociology, 11, pp. 51-76.
  8. Bonneau, M. 2015. Setting the scene: the potential of social innovation for cities. Social Innovation in Cities, pp. 6-8. European Union, Urbact II Capitalisation.
  9. Brodie, E., Cowling, E. and Nissen, N. 2009. Understanding Participation: A Literature Review. London: IVR, NCVO and Involve.
  10. Bulkeley, H. 2010. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, pp. 229-253.
  11. Bryman, A. 2015. Social research methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Cheung, K. and Fung, Y.Y. 2017. Partnering for Impact. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 14-15. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  13. Cirilli, B. and Speroni, L. 2016. La sharing economy quale modalità di implementazione e diffusione della social innovation. In M.G. Caroli Ed. L’innovazione delle imprese leader per creare valore sociale. Terzo rapporto CERIIS sull’innovazione sociale, pp. 157-167. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  15. Davies, A. and Simon, J. 2013. The Value and Role of Citizen Engagement in Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project: ‘The theoretical, empirical and policy foundation for building social innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
  16. Davies, A., Simon, J., Patrick, R. and Norman, W. 2012. Mapping Citizen Engagement in the Process of Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project: ‘The theoretical, empirical and policy foundation for building social innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
  17. European Commission, DG Regional Policy 2011. Cities of tomorrow: Challenges, visions, ways forward. http://ec.europa.eu., 10.2776/41803.DOI: 10.2776/41803.
  18. Fontanella Khan, J. 2013. The Miracle of the Han River: South Korea eDossier. -- http://eastwest.eu/attachments/article/1590/East_49_The_miracle_of_theHan_River.pdf.
  19. Foster, S. and Iaione, C. 2016. The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34 (2), pp. 281-349.
  20. Fusch, P.I. and Ness, L.R. 2015. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), pp.1408–1416.
  21. Garoli, M.G. 2016. L’innovazione sociale: caratteristiche chiave, determinanti e principali manifestazioni empiriche. In M.G. Garoli Eds. Modelli ed esperienze di innovazione sociale in Italia, p. 41-79. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  22. Iaione, C. 2013. La città come bene comune. Aedon. Rivista di Arti e Diritto Online, 1. -- http://www.aedon.mulino.it/archivio/2013/1/iaione.htm.
  23. Iaione, C. and De Nictolis, E. 2016. La quintupla elica come approccio alla governance dell’innovazione sociale. In F. Montanari and L. Mizzau Eds. I luoghi dell’innovazione aperta. Modelli di sviluppo territoriale e inclusione sociale, pp. 75-89. Rome: Fondazione G. Brodolini, Studi e Ricerche, 55.
  24. Iaione, C. and De Nictolis, E. 2017. “Urban Pooling”. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 44, pp. 665-701.
  25. International Association for Public Participation. 2014. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. -- https://bit.ly/2jegJQZ.
  26. Ito, K. 2017. Creating Systemic Change. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 20-21. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  27. Kahane, A and Senge, P. 2007. Solving Tough Problems: An Open Way of Talking, Listening, and Creating New Realities. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  28. Kern, K. and Alber, G. 2009. Governing climate change in cities: modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. The International Conference on Competitive Cities and Climate Change, pp.171-196. Milan, Italy, 9-10 October, 2009.
  29. Kim, J., Rim, S., Han, S. and Park, A. 2015. Seoul City’s Social Innovation Strategy: New Models of Communication to Strengthen Citizen Engagement. In A. Nicholls et al. Eds. New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, pp.170-191. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  30. Jarvis, O. and Marvel, R. 2013. When Bees meet Trees. How large social sector organisations can help to scale social innovation. London: Clore Social Leadership Programme.
  31. Jessop, B. 2005. The Political Economy of Scale and European Governance. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG. 96(2), pp. 225-230.
  32. Jo, Y.N. and Walker, R. 2014. Social Isolation and Poverty in South Korea. A Manifestation of the Poverty-Shame Nexus. In E. Chase and G. Bantebya Kyomuhendo Eds., Poverty and Shame: Global Experiences. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
  33. Johansen, B. 2007. Get There Early: Sensing the Future to Compete in the Present. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  34. Johnson, C. 2014a. Sharing City Seoul: a Model for the World. Shareable. June 3, 2014. -- https://bit.ly/SqQwOH.
  35. ― 2014b. ShareHub: at the Heart of Seoul’s Sharing Movement. Shareable. October 29, 2014. https://bit.ly/2O67h32.
  36. ― 2015. Despite Slow Adoption, Seoul Doubles Down on Sharing City Project. Shareable. October 29, 2015. https://bit.ly/2ydIzTX.
  37. Lai, Z. and Zhou, H. 2017. Making Strides in Social Innovation. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 7-8. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  38. Lee, E.K. 2017. Engaging Citizens in Society. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 16-17. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  39. Lee, J. 2017. Fashioning New Values in Hong Kong. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 12-13. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  40. Lee, W. 2017. Innovating Local Government. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds., Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 18-19. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  41. Lee, Y. and Ko, Y.G. 2017. Feeling lonely when not socially isolated. Social isolation moderates the association between loneliness and daily social interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(10), pp. 1340-1355.
  42. Leydesdorff, L. and Etzkowitz, H. 1998. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), pp. 195-203.
  43. Maruca R. and Rabellino E. Eds. 2017. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  44. Mingione, T. and Vicari, S. 2015. Politiche urbane e innovazione sociale. In A.G. Calafati Eds., Città tra sviluppo e declino: un’agenda urbana per l’Italia, pp. 97-108. Roma: Donzelli.
  45. Morse, J.M. 1994. Emerging from the Data: The Cognitive Process of Analysis in Qualitative Inquiry. In J.M. Morse Ed. Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, pp. 23-41 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  46. Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., MacCallum, D. and Leubolt, B. 2017. Social Innovation as a Trigger for Transformations. The Role of Research. Brussels: European Commission.
  47. Mulgan, G., Ali, R., Halkett, R. and Sanders, B. 2007. In and out of sync. The challenge of growing social innovations, London: NESTA.
  48. Mulgan, G., Wilkie, N., Tucker, S., Ali, R., Davis, F. and Liptrot, T. 2006. Social Silicon Valleys - a manifesto for social innovation. London: The Young Foundation.
  49. Murray R., Caulier-Grice J. and Mulgan G. 2010. The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: The Young Foundation.
  50. Nelson, L.C. 2000. Measured Excess: Status, Gender, and Consumer Nationalism in South Korea. New York: Columbia University Press.
  51. O’Byrne, L. Miller, M., Douse, C., Venkatesh, R. and Kapucu, N. 2014. Social Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Seoul Metropolitan Government. Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 4(1), pp.51-69. doi.org/10.14706/jecoss11414
  52. OECD. 2015. Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing Paris. -- Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance2015-en.
  53. Park, W. S. 2013. Forging Ahead with Cross-Sector Innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Supplement to SSIR, pp. 15-17. https://bit.ly/2IESINW.
  54. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  55. Puttick, R., Baeck, P. and Colligan, P. 2014. The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. London: Nesta.
  56. Rose, C. 1986. The Comedy of the Commons: Commerce, Customs and Inherently Public Property. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship. Repository Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1828, pp. 711-781.
  57. Rosso, E. 2004. Torino. Il Piano strategico come strumento di governance urbana e promozione territoriale. In V. Fedeli and F. Gastaldi Eds. Pratiche strategiche di pianificazione. Riflessioni a partire da nuovi spazi urbani in costruzione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  58. Ryu, H. and Kwon, W. 2014. I don’t want to leave anything as the Seoul Mayor. Ohmynews. -- http://goo.gl/kaW5Lz.
  59. Saldaña, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  60. Sgaragli F. Ed. 2014. Enabling social innovation ecosystem for community-led territorial development, Roma: Fondazione G. Bradolini.
  61. ShareHub 2015a. Sharing Economy Startup School. -- ShareHub. http://sharehub.kr/sharestoryEn/news_view.do?storySeq=141.
  62. ― 2015b. Did you enjoy Sharing City Seoul Fair? -- ShareHub. https://bit.ly/2Qu5SAd.
  63. ― 2016. [Seoul] – Sharing Economy Startup School for Youth: Sowing the seed of sharing economy. -- ShareHub. https://bit.ly/2xZ9EKY.
  64. ― 2017a. [Seoul City] 2017 Sharing Economy Start School. ShareHub. -- https://bit.ly/2P8zRNL
  65. ― 2017b. [Sharing City Seoul] Seongbuk-gu Sharing Economy Academy Completion Ceremony. -- ShareHub. https://bit.ly/2yd8R8E.
  66. Shen D. and Li, F. 2017. East Asia’s Role in Global Social Innovation. In R. Maruca and E. Rabellino Eds. Social Innovation and Social Transition in East Asia, pp. 3-4. Standford Social Innovation Review, Beijing: Leping Social Entrepreneur Foundation.
  67. SMG 2014a. Sharing City, Seoul. Ebook. -- https://bit.ly/2OCPWhC.
  68. ― 2014b. Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on The Promotion of Sharing. English version No. 5619. -- https://bit.ly/29Pv2nJ.
  69. ― 2017. City Administration Plans. Press Release Seoul Metropolitan Government. -- https://bit.ly/2zR39eQ.
  70. Song, Y. and Lindquist, R. 2015. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on depression, anxiety, stress and mindfulness in Korean nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35, pp. 86-90.
  71. Stoker, G. 2004. Designing institutions for governance in complex environments: Normative rational choice and cultural institutional theories explored and contrasted. Economic and Social Research Council Fellowship Paper No. 1.
  72. The Hope Institute 2017. Social Innovation in Asia: Trends and Characteristics in China, Korea, India, Japan and Thailand. In T. Morris-Suzuki and E.J. Soh Eds. New Worlds from Below: Informal life politics and grassroots action in twenty-first-century Northeast Asia, pp. 249-274. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press, The Australian National University.
  73. The Young Foundation 2012. Social Innovation Overview: A Deliverable of the Project. The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme (Brussels: European Commission, DG Research, 2012). -- https://bit.ly/2mja0FI.
  74. Urama, K. C. and Acheampong, E. N. 2013. Social Innovation Creates Prosperous Societies. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Supplement to SSIR, pp. 9-11. https://bit.ly/2MR56fL.
  75. Westley, F. 2008. The Social Innovation Dynamic. Canada: Social Innovation Generation at the University of Waterloo. -- https://bit.ly/2ycHNq5.
  76. Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  77. Zanoni D., Pacchi C., Masetti-Zannini A. 2013. Social Innovation Workshops. Rapporto finale. Avanzi-Sostenibilità per azioni. -- https://bit.ly/2NiITGd.

Monica Bernardi, in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2018, pp. 71-93, DOI:10.3280/SP2018-002004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche