Brands and productive publics in the event economy: the case of Milano Design Week

Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori: Alberto Cossu
Anno di pubblicazione: 2018 Fascicolo: 152 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 62 P. 43-64 Dimensione file: 216 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SL2018-152003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The economy of the event designates a production method (Bologna and Banfi, 2011) based on short-term events open to the public (festivals, exhibitions, fairs, etc.) and characterised by structural instability. In this context, successful events are pivotal in the global competition for a city to be perceived as truly creative (Florida, 2002). Success is measured by attendance (e.g. the number of visitors) and, increasingly, by the social media activity an event is capable of triggering. My contribution focuses on the role of publics as producers (Arvidsson, 2013) during Milano Design Week. A digital methods analysis (Rogers, 2013) is under¬taken on a dataset of 10,000 Instagram photos along with a critical visual anal¬ysis (Rose, 2016). Through these methods I identify the communication patterns between the publics and the event’s main communication outlets, allowing me to assess the extent to which publics reproduce or resist the dominant aesthetics proposed by the Design Week brand.

  1. Arvidsson A. (2013). The potential of consumer publics. Ephemera, 13(2): 367 391.
  2. Arvidsson A. (2006). Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2012.669449.
  3. Balduini M., Della Valle E., Dell’Aglio D., Tsytsarau M., Palpanas T., Confalonieri C. (2013) Twindex Fuorisalone: Social Listening of Milano during Fuorisalone 2013. In: Cimiano P., Fernández M., Lopez V., Schlobach S., Völker J., eds., The Semantic Web: ESWC 2013 Satellite Events. ESWC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7955. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41242-4_59.
  4. Boccia Artieri G. (2012). Productive publics and transmedia participation. Participations, 9(2): 448-468.
  5. Bologna S., Banfi D. (2011). Vita da freelance. I lavoratori della conoscenza e il loro futuro. Milan: Feltrinelli.
  6. Bruns A., Burgess J. (2011). The use of twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In: 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Iceland (25-27 August). Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
  7. Caliandro A., Gandini A. (2017). Qualitative Research in Digital Environments: A Research Toolkit. London: Routledge. Cossetta A., Caliandro A. (2013). La maternità nelle narrazioni online. AIS Journal of Sociology, 1: 79-104.
  8. 316. Florida R.L. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  9. Gibbs M., Meese J., Arnold M., Carter M. (2014). #Funerals and Instagram: Death, Social Media and Platform Vernacular. Information Communication and Society, 18(3): 255-268. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152.
  10. Gillespie T. (2010). The politics of “platforms”. New Media Society, 12(3): 347 364.
  11. Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hine C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.
  12. Marwick A., Boyd D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1): 114 133. Business Review, Jul-Aug.
  13. Rogers R. (2013). Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Rosa H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
  15. Rose G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.
  16. Tarde G. (1969[1898]). The public and the crowd. In: Clark T., ed., Gabriel Tarde on Communication and Social Influence (pp. 277-296). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Van Dijck J. (2008). Digital Photography: Communication, Identity, Memory. Visual Communication, 7: 57-76. DOI: 10.1177/1470357207084865.
  18. Arvidsson A., Caliandro A. (2018). Brand Publics. -- Text available at the website www.academia.edu/19333276/Brand_Public [Last Access July 2018].
  19. Arvidsson A., Colleoni E. (2012). Value in Informational Capitalism on the Internet. The Information Society, 28(3): 135-150.
  20. Cova B. (1997). Community and Consumption: Towards a Theory of the Linking Value of Products and Services. European Journal of Marketing, 31(3/4): 297
  21. Gandini A. (2015). The Reputation Economy: Understanding Knowledge Work in Digital Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  22. Lury C. (2004) Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy. London: Routledge.
  23. Manovich L. (2018). Instagram and Contemporary Image. -- Text available at the website http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/148-instagram-andcontemporarimage/instagram_book_manovich.pdf [Last Access July 2018].

Alberto Cossu, Brands and productive publics in the event economy: the case of Milano Design Week in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 152/2018, pp 43-64, DOI: 10.3280/SL2018-152003