Click here to download

Dynamic and functional characteristics of the couple costitutive stage
Journal Title: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Author/s:  Marialuisa Gennari, Giancarlo Tamanza 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 615-638 FullText PDF:  232 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2018-004005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The research presented aims to analyze the characteristics of the couple rela-tionship considered in its constitutive phase, both as regards the quality of her functioning, and as regards some representational and attributive aspects at the base of the establishment of the couple relationship itself. The objectives con-cern, in particular, the exploration of the latent and structural forms of the couple bond and the evaluation of the interrelations between the forms of the couple bond and some dimensions of dyadic psychic functioning that appear relevant for relational functioning. For this purpose, 66 couples residing throughout Italy have been recruited. Each of them was given a multimethodological protocol which includes a joint clinical interview and some individual self-report question-naires. The data thus produced were examined through univariate and bivariate analyzes and, subsequently, considered jointly through a cluster analysis that al-lowed to identify three types of relationship profiles. The results obtained outline an articulated panorama and some differentiated positions, that is, forms of the relationship where the balance between aspects of force and problematic or un-certain aspects determines distinct prevalence. Three different clusters have been identified, distinguished by the relevance of properly relational variables with re-spect to personal variables. This would confirm the theoretical assumption pro-moted by the relational and systemic perspectives that consider the proprium of the couple relationship, independently of the construct considered, a surplus and a substantial specific otherness with respect to the personal contributions of the partners.
Keywords: Couple bond, couple constitution, couple identity, multimethod approach.

  1. Banse, R. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 273-282.
  2. Barbaranelli, C., & D’Olimpio, F. (2006). Analisi dei dati con SPSS (Vol. 2). Milano: Led.
  3. Bertoni, A., & Bodenmann, G. (2010). Satisfied and Dissatisfied Couples. European Psychologist, 15(3), 175-184.
  4. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. (1986). Between Give and Take. A Clinical Guide to Contextual Therapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  5. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G.M. (1973). Lealtà invisibili (trad. it. 1988). Roma: Astrolabio
  6. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
  7. Brennan, K.A., Clark, C.L., & Shaver, P.R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J.A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Brown, M., Larson, J., Harper, J., & Holman, T. (2016). Family-of-origin experience and emotional health as predictors of relationship self-regulation in marriage. Journal of Family Therapy, 38(3), 319-339.
  9. Bruch, M.A., Levo, L.C., & Arisohn, B.A. (1984). Conceptual complexity and skill in marital communication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 927-932.
  10. Campbell, L., Simpson, J.A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D.A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(3), 510.
  11. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484-494.
  12. Carli, L., Cavanna, D., & Zavattini, G.C. (2009). Psicologia delle relazioni di coppia. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Cigoli, V. (2003). La coppia tra scenari di origine e nuova nascita. In M. Andolfi e V. Cigoli (Eds.), La famiglia d’origine. L’incontro in psicoterapia e nellaformazione (pp. 125-146). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Cigoli, V. (2006). L’albero della discendenza. Clinica dei corpi familiari. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Cigoli, V., e Scabini, E. (2006). Family Identity. Ties, Symbols, and Transitions. New York, NY: Taylor.
  16. Cigoli, V., & Tamanza, G. (2009). L’Intervista Clinica Generazionale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  17. Cigoli, V., Margola, D., Gennari, M., & Snyder, D.K. (2014). Terapie di coppia. L’approccio integrativo e l’approccio relazionale-simbolico. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  18. Cigoli, V. (1999). Il patto Infranto. In M. Andolfi (ed.), La crisi della coppia: una prospettiva sistemico-relazionale (pp. 297-424). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  19. Cigoli, V., & Facchin, F. (2014). Narcisismo: dagli intrecci narrativi alla clinica del legame di coppia. Sociologia, 2, 47-53.
  20. Clulow, C. (2003). An attachment perspective on reunions in couple psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 5(3), 269-281.
  21. Colman, W. (2005). Marriage as a Psychological Container. In S. Ruszczynski (ed.) (1993), Psychotherapy with Couples: Theory and Practice at the Tavistock Institute of Marital Studies (pp. 70-96). London: Karnac Book.
  22. Conger, R., Cui, M., Bryant, C., & Elder, G. (2000). Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 224-237.
  23. Creasey, G. (2002). Associations between working models of attachment and conflict management behavior in romantic couples. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 365.
  24. Demir, M. (2010). Close relationships and happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 293-313.
  25. Di Nuovo, S., Lo Verso, G., Di Blasi, M., Giannone, F. (Eds.) (1998). Valutare le psicoterapie. La ricerca italiana. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  26. Dickinson, K.A., & Pincus, A.L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of personality disorders, 17(3), 188-207.
  27. Dicks H.V. (1992). Tensioni coniugali (ed. or. 1967). Roma: Borla.
  28. Donati, P. (2006). Manuale di sociologia della famiglia. Roma: Editore Laterza.
  29. Duemmler, S. L., & Kobak, R. (2001). The development of commitment and attachment in dating relationships: Attachment security as relationship construct. Journal of adolescence, 24(3), 401-415.
  30. Eisler, R.M., Hersen, M., Miller, P.M., & Blanchard, E.B. (1975). Situational determinants of assertive behaviors. Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 330.
  31. Erol, R.Y., & Orth, U. (2014). Development of self-esteem and relationship satisfaction in couples: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental psychology, 50(9), 2291.
  32. Fincham, F.D., Hall, J., & Beach, S.R. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415-427.
  33. Finkel, E.J., Hui, C.,M., Carswell, K.L., & Larson, G.M. (2014a). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1-41.
  34. Fisher, J. (2001). L’ospite inatteso. Dal narcisismo al rapporto di coppia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  35. Framo, J. (1992). Terapia intergenerazionale (trad. it. 1996). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  36. Gattis, K.S., Berns, S., Simpson, L.E., & Christensen, A. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 564.
  37. Gennari, M., Molgora, S., Pirovano, N., & Saita, E. (2015). La costruzione della domanda psicologica attraverso il colloquio clinico. I fondamenti, il metodo, i contesti. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  38. Gennari, M., & Tamanza, G. (2017). Parental alienation (PAS) and Child Custody Evaluation: Clinical suggestions from some cases’ analysis [Alienazione Genitoriale (PAS) e procedimenti di Consulenza Tecnica d’Ufficio: Evidenze cliniche dall’analisi di alcune valutazioni]. Maltrattamento e Abuso all’Infanzia, 1, 13-27., DOI: 10.3280/MAL2017-001002
  39. Gennari, M., Tamanza, G., & Molgora, S. (2018), Intimate partner violence and child custody evaluation: a model for preliminary clinical intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1471.
  40. Iafrate, R., & Scabini, E. (2003). Psicologia dei legami familiari. Bologna: il Mulino.
  41. ISTAT (2015). -- http://www.istat.it/it/files/2015/11/Matrimoni-separazioni-e-divorzi-2014.pdf.
  42. Josselson, R. (1996). Revising herself: The story of women’s identity from college to midlife. New York: Oxford University Press.
  43. Keller, P.S., Blincoe, S., Gilbert, L.R., DeWall, C.N., Haak, E.A., & Widiger, T. (2014). Narcissism in romantic relationships: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33, 25-50.
  44. Kernberg, O.F. (1995). Relazioni d’amore. Normalità e patologia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  45. Knapp, D.J., Norton, A.M., & Sandberg, J.G. (2015). Family-of-origin, relationship self-regulation, and attachment in marital relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37(2), 130-141.
  46. Lamkin, J., Campbell, K., W., vanDellen, M.R., & Miller, J.D. (2015). An exploration of the correlates of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in romantic relationships: Homophily, partner characteristics, and dyadic adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 166-171.
  47. Lavner, J.A., Lamkin, J., Miller, J.D., Campbell, W.K., & Karney, B.R. (2016). Narcissism and newlywed marriage: Partner characteristics and marital trajectories. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 169.
  48. Letzring, T.D., & Noftle, E.E. (2010). Predicting relationship quality from self-verification of broad personality traits among romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 353-362.
  49. Li, T., & Chan, D.K.S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 406-419.
  50. Locke, K.D. (2008). Attachment styles and interpersonal approach and avoidance goals in everyday couple interactions. Personal Relationships, 15(3), 359-374.
  51. MacDonald, G., Locke, K.D., Spielmann, S.S., & Joel, S. (2013). Insecure attachment predicts ambivalent social threat and reward perceptions in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(5), 647-661.
  52. Mackinnon, S.P., Sherry, S.B., Antony, M.M., Stewart, S.H., Sherry, D.L., & Hartling, N. (2012). Caught in a bad romance: Perfectionism, conflict, and depression in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(2), 215.
  53. MacLean, A.P. (1998). Assertiveness homework for couples. In L.L. Hecker & S. Deacon (Eds.), The therapist’s notebook: Homework, handouts, and activities. (pag.87-93). Binghampthon, New York: The Haworth Press.
  54. Malagoli Togliatti, M., Angrisani, P., & Barone, M. (2000). La psicoterapia con la coppia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  55. McWilliams, N., Schimmenti, A., & Caretti, V. (2012). La diagnosi psicoanalitica. Roma: Astrolabio.
  56. Miller, P.J.E., Niehuis S., & Huston, T.L. (2006). Positive illusions in marital relationships: a 13-year longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1579-1594.
  57. Minuchin, S. (1974). Famiglie e terapie della famiglia (tr. it. 1976). Roma: Astrolabio.
  58. Monguzzi, F. (2006). La coppia come paziente: Relazioni patologiche e consultazione clinica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  59. Naud, C., Lussier, Y., Sabourin, S., Normandin, L., Clarkin, J.F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2013). How attachment and excessive self-sacrificing depressive dynamics are related to couple relationship satisfaction over time. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2(1), 14.
  60. Neyer, F.J., & Voigt, D. (2004). Personality and social network effects on romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 279-299.
  61. Nicolò Corigliano, A. (Ed.) (2002). Curare la relazione. Saggi sulla psicoanalisi e la coppia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  62. Norsa, D., & Zavattini, G.C. (1997). Intimità e collusione. Teoria e tecnica della psicoterapia psicoanalitica di coppia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  63. Overall, N.C., Fletcher, G.J., & Simpson, J.A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1496-1513.
  64. Overall, N.C., Fletcher, G.J., Simpson, J.A., & Fillo, J. (2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners’ negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(5), 730.
  65. Paetzold, R.L., Rholes, W.S., & Kohn, J.L. (2015). Disorganized attachment in adulthood: Theory, measurement, and implications for romantic relationships. Review of General Psychology, 19(2), 146.
  66. Paleari, F.G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F.D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychological assessment, 21(2), 194.
  67. Parise, M. (2013). Molto più di due, costruzione dell’identità di coppia e relazioni familiari. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  68. Pelucchi, S., Paleari, F.G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F.D. (2013). Self-forgiveness in romantic relationships: It matters to both of us. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(4), 541-549.
  69. Picardi, A., Bitetti, D., Puddu, P., & Pasquini, P. (2000). La scala ‘Experiences In Close Relationships (ECL), un nuovo strumento per la valutazione dell’attaccamento negli adulti: traduzione, adattamento e validazione della versione italiana. Rivista di Psichiatria, 35(3), 114-120.
  70. Pincus, L., & Dare, C. (1978). Il contratto segreto del matrimonio (trad. it. 1983). In Cigoli V. (Ed.), Terapia familiare: l'orientamento psicoanalitico. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  71. Ranieri, S., Molgora, S., Tamanza, G., & Emery, R.E. (2016). Promoting Coparenting After Divorce: A Relational Perspective on Child Custody Evaluations in Italy. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 57(5), 361-373., DOI: 10.1080/10502556.2016.1185204
  72. Reis, H.T., Clark, M.S., & Holmes, J.G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D.J. Mashek, & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 415-428). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  73. Rohmann, E., Bierhoff, H.W., & Schmohr, M. (2010). Narcissism and perceived inequity in attractiveness in romantic relationships. European psychologist. 16(4), 295-302.
  74. Rohmann, E., Neumann, E., Herner, M.J., & Bierhoff, H-W. (2011). Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism; Self-Construal, Attachment, and Love in Romantic Relationship. European Psychologist, 17, 279–290. 
  75. Rusbult, C.E., Van Lange, P.A. M., Wildschut, T., Yovetich, N.A., & Verette, J. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationship: why it exits e persists, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 521-545.
  76. Rushkoff, D. (2013). Present shock: When everything happens now. New York: Penguin Press.
  77. Scabini, E., & Cigoli, V. (2012). Alla ricerca del famigliare. Il modello relazionale-simbolico. Milano: Cortina.
  78. Schoebi, D., Karney, B.R., & Bradbury, T.N. (2012). Stability and change in the first 10 years of marriage: Does commitment confer benefits beyond the effects of satisfaction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 729-742.
  79. Shaver, P.R., Belsky, J., & Brennan, K.A. (2000). The adult attachment interview and self‐reports of romantic attachment: Associations across domains and methods. Personal Relationships, 7(1), 25-43.
  80. Slatcher, R.B., & Vazire, S. (2009). Effects of global and contextualized personality on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 624-633.
  81. Togliatti, M.M., Angrisani, P., & Barone, M. (2004). La psicoterapia con la coppia. Il modello integrato dei contratti. Teoria e pratica (Vol. 9). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  82. Weigel, D.J., Bennett, K.K., & Ballard-Reisch, D.S. (2003). Family influences on commitment: Examining the family of origin correlates of relationship commitment attitudes. Personal Relationships, 10(4), 453-474.
  83. Whitaker, C. (1982). Le funzioni del matrimoni. In M. Andolfi (Ed.), La crisi di coppia. Una prospettiva sistemico-relazionale (pp. 3-11) (trad. it. 1999). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  84. Willi, J. (2015). La collusione di coppia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  85. Yoshida, K., & Busby, D.M. (2012). Intergenerational transmission effects on relationship satisfaction: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Family Issues, 33(2), 202-222.
  86. Zavattini, G.C., Pace, C.S., & Santona, A. (2010). Attaccamento adulto e matching di coppia. Infanzia e Adolescenza, 9(1), 39-52.

Marialuisa Gennari, Giancarlo Tamanza, Dynamic and functional characteristics of the couple costitutive stage in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 4/2018, pp. 615-638, DOI:10.3280/RIP2018-004005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content