Click here to download

Environmental taxes and green fiscal reform in Italy: An update
Journal Title: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Author/s: Andrea Zatti 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  37 Pg. 31-67 FullText PDF:  438 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2018-001003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The use of economic instruments in environmental policies has attracted a wide and increasing interest in the international and European debate in recent decades. Environmental taxes and subsidies, in particular, have been seen as useful policy instruments to enhance environmental protection, getting the price right and creating market based incentives for environmentally-friendly behaviors. Despite these premises, the actual implementation of EFRs has often lagged behind their full potential, leading to marginal changes in the fiscal system. In this paper we describe the main characteristics of, respectively, environmentally related taxes and environmentally related subsidies at present implemented in Italy, designing some possible evolutionary paths, both on the revenue and expenditure side. The Italian experience turns out to be, in this perspective, an interesting case study, for several reasons. Firstly, because both taxes and subsidies have, in the past, been largely exploited for the attainment of wider economic and social objectives, often without a full ex-ante and ex-post assessment of their level of environmental merit. Secondly, because the recent economic crises exacerbated the need for high-debt countries to find growth-friendly and less distortive ways to correct budget imbalances, reforming and optimizing both the revenue and the expenditure side of the public intervention. Thirdly, because many international organizations and scientific agencies have recommended that Italy develop its environmental fiscal reform, with the indispensable steps of introducing new green taxes, restructuring existing ones and removing environmentally-harmful subsidies. All in all, the analysis leads to the conclusion that the key objective should be that of selec-tivity: i.e. that of tackling environmental challenges in an effective way, aligning taxes to closer reflect environmental damage, benefits and priorities, and without having revenue-generating potential as the first driving force of future initiatives.
Keywords: Environmentally-related taxes, environmental-fiscal reforms, environmentally-harmful subsidies, public budgets, Italian experience.
Jel Code: H23, H60, Q58

  1. Camporeale C., Grassi L., Molocchi A. (2018). The diesel fuel excise duty gap as compared to gasoline: an environmental coherence assessment through the external costs approach, Working Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference of the Italian Association of Environmental and Resource Economist (IAERE) in Turin 15th – 16th February 2018.
  2. Carraro F., Zatti A. (2012). Decentralized Environmental Taxation: A Preliminary Assessment. In: Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation. Volume XI, Environmental Taxation and Climate Change. Edward Elgar.
  3. Carraro F., Zatti A. (2013). Environmental taxation and municipal fiscal federalism: remarks and perspectives on the Italian case study. Economics and policy of energy and the environment, 2: 61-92.
  4. Constanze A., Röhring K. (2016). Green taxes as a means of financing the EU Budget: Policy options, Green Budget Europe, July.
  5. EEA European Environment Agency (2000). Environmental taxation – recent developments in tools for integration. Environmental Issues Report, 18, Copenhagen.
  6. EEA-European Environment Agency (2006). Using the market for cost-effective environmental policy. EEA Report, 1, Copenhagen.
  7. EEA-European Environment Agency (2011a). Environmental fiscal reform: illustrative potential in Italy, prepared for the conference Environmentally-related taxation and fiscal reform, Rome.
  8. EEA-European Environment Agency (2011b). Environmental tax reform in Europe: implications for income redistribution, Technical Report, 16, Copenhagen.
  9. EEA-European Environment Agency (2014). Resource-efficient green economy and EU policies. EEA Report, 2, Copenhagen.
  10. EEA-European Environment Agency (2015). Monitoring CO2 emissions from new passenger cars and vans in 2014. Technical Report n. 16, Copenhagen.
  11. EEA-European Environment Agency (2016). Environmental taxation and EU environmental policies. EEA Report n° 17, Copenhagen.
  12. Ekins P. (1999). European environmental taxes and charges: recent experience, issues and trends. Ecological Economics, 31: 39-62.
  13. Eunomia et al. (2014). Study on Assessing the Environmental Fiscal Reform Potential in 12 EU Member States. Final report to DG Environment of the European Commission.
  14. Eunomia et al. (2016). Study on Assessing the Environmental Fiscal Reform Potential for the EU28. Final report for the European Commission.
  15. European Commission (1993a). Towards sustainability. A European Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development. Luxembourg.
  16. European Commission (1993b). Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century, White Paper, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 6/93, European Commission, Brussels.
  17. European Commission (1996). Tax provisions with a potential impact on environmental protection. September, Luxembourg.
  18. European Commission (2001). Environment 2010: Our future, Our choice – The Sixth Environment Action Programme. COM (2001) 31, Brussels.
  19. European Commission (2007a). GREEN PAPER on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes. COM (2007) 140, Brussels.
  20. European Commission (2007b). Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the GREEN PAPER on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes, SEC (2007)388, Brussels.
  21. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission. EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020, Brussels.
  22. Eurostat (2018). Taxation trends in the European Union. Luxembourg.
  23. Gruppo di Lavoro sull’Erosione Fiscale (2011). Rapporto finale. Roma.
  24. GSE-Gestore Servizi Energetici (2018). La spesa energetica delle famiglie e le risorse impegnate per la promozione delle fonti rinnovabili e dell’efficienza energetica. Scenari evolutivi a politiche correnti, Roma.
  25. Harding M. (2014). Personal Tax treatment of Company Cars and Commuting Expenses, «OECD Taxation Working Papers», 20, Paris, OECD Publishing.
  26. High Level Group on Own Resources (2016). Future financing of the EU. Final report and recommendations. December.
  27. Ieep-Institute for European environmental Policy (2014). Environmental Tax Reform in Europe: Opportunities for the future. Final report, Report for The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Brussels.
  28. Impact Assessment Office (2017a). Fiscal Expenditures. Incentives, deductions and exemptions: how many exist? Who benefits from them? Senate of the Italian Republic, Focus, September.
  29. Impact Assessment Office (2017b). Does the polluter pay? The social cost of pollution caused by economic activities and environmental taxes in Italy. Senate of the Italian Republic, Focus, December.
  30. Lapecorella F, Ravazzi Douvan A. (2014). A green tax reform in times of financial economic crisis. The Italian Attempts 2012 and 2014. GCET 2014, Copenhagen.
  31. Leicester A. (2006). The UK tax system and the environment. The Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.
  32. Miceli R. (2016). Tassazione ambientale e sistema tributario nazionale: nuove linee guida per le Regioni dalla sentenza della corte Costituzionale N. 58/2015. Rivista trimestrale di diritto tributario: 57-82.
  33. Ministere de l’Environnement, de l’Energie et de la Mer (2017). Fiscalité environnementale. Un état des lieux, Paris, Janvier.
  34. Ministry of the Environment, Land and Sea (2016). Italian catalogue of environmentally friendly subsidies and environmentally harmful subsidies 2016. Synthesis. December, Rome.
  35. OECD (1989). Economic instruments for environmental protection. Paris.
  36. OECD (1991). Environmental policy: how to apply economic instruments. Paris.
  37. OECD (1993). Taxation and the environment: complementary policy. Paris.
  38. OECD (1994). Managing the environment: the role of economic instruments. Paris.
  39. OECD (1995). Environmental fiscal reform for poverty reduction. Paris.
  40. OECD (1996). Implementation strategies for environmental taxes. Paris.
  41. OECD (1997). Environmental taxes and green tax reform. Paris.
  42. OECD (2001). Environmentally related taxes in OECD countries. Paris.
  43. OECD (2006). The political economy of environmentally related taxes. Paris.
  44. OECD (2013). Taxing energy use: a graphical analysis. Paris.
  45. OECD (2017a). Environmental fiscal reform. Progress, prospects and pitfall, OECD report for the G7 Environment Ministers, Paris.
  46. OECD (2018). OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2018. Paris.
  47. Verrigni C. (2013). Environmental taxation I Italian fiscal federalism. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 2: 43-59.
  48. Vollebergh H. (2014). Green tax reform: Energy tax challenges for the Netherlands, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  49. Zatti A. (2017). Verso una riallocazione verde dei bilanci pubblici. Pavia University Press, Pavia.

Andrea Zatti, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2018, pp. 31-67, DOI:10.3280/EFE2018-001003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content